[compiler-rt] [fuzzer] Skip trying to set the thread name on MinGW (llvm#115167)

Since b4130be, we check for
_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_PTHREAD to decide between using
SetThreadDescription or pthread_setname_np for setting the thread name.

c6f3b7b changed how libcxx defines
their configuration macros - now they are always defined, but defined to
0 or 1, while they previously were either defined or undefined.

As these libcxx defines used to be defined to an empty string (rather
than expanding to 1) if enabled, we can't easily produce an expression
that works both with older and newer libcxx. Additionally, these defines
are libcxx internal config macros that aren't a detail that isn't
supported and isn't meant to be relied upon.

Simply skip trying to set thread name on MinGW as we can't easily know
which kind of thread native handle we have. Setting the thread name is
only a nice to have, quality of life improvement - things should work
the same even without it.

Additionally, libfuzzer isn't generally usable on MinGW targets yet
(Clang doesn't include it in the getSupportedSanitizers() method for the
MinGW target), so this shouldn't make any difference in practice anyway.

Author: mstorsjo

compiler-rt/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerUtilWindows.cpp

@@ -239,10 +239,11 @@ size_t PageSize() {
 }
 
 void SetThreadName(std::thread &thread, const std::string &name) {
-#if defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_PTHREAD) ||                                 \
-    defined(_GLIBCXX_GCC_GTHR_POSIX_H)
-  (void)pthread_setname_np(thread.native_handle(), name.c_str());
-#else
+#ifndef __MINGW32__
+  // Not setting the thread name in MinGW environments. MinGW C++ standard
+  // libraries can either use native Windows threads or pthreads, so we
+  // don't know with certainty what kind of thread handle we're getting
+  // from thread.native_handle() here.
   typedef HRESULT(WINAPI * proc)(HANDLE, PCWSTR);
   HMODULE kbase = GetModuleHandleA("KernelBase.dll");
   proc ThreadNameProc = reinterpret_cast<proc>(