Drop the stale final_expiry_too_soon error code

This replaces `final_expiry_too_soon` with
`incorrect_or_unknown_payment` as was done in
lightning/bolts#608. Note that the
rationale for this (that it may expose whether you are the final
recipient for the payment or not) does not currently apply to us -
we don't apply different final CLTV values to different payments.
However, we might in the future, and this will make us slightly
more consistent with other nodes.

Author: TheBlueMatt

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

@@ -2042,10 +2042,13 @@ impl<M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelManager<M, T, K, F
 		// Also, ensure that, in the case of an unknown preimage for the received payment hash, our
 		// payment logic has enough time to fail the HTLC backward before our onchain logic triggers a
 		// channel closure (see HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER rationale).
-		if (hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value as u64) <= self.best_block.read().unwrap().height() as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1	{
+		let current_height: u32 = self.best_block.read().unwrap().height();
+		if (hop_data.outgoing_cltv_value as u64) <= current_height as u64 + HTLC_FAIL_BACK_BUFFER as u64 + 1 {
+			let mut err_data = Vec::with_capacity(12);
+			err_data.extend_from_slice(&amt_msat.to_be_bytes());
+			err_data.extend_from_slice(&current_height.to_be_bytes());
 			return Err(ReceiveError {
-				err_code: 17,
-				err_data: Vec::new(),
+				err_code: 0x4000 | 15, err_data,
 				msg: "The final CLTV expiry is too soon to handle",
 			});
 		}

lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs

@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ fn test_onion_failure() {
 		connect_blocks(&nodes[0], height - nodes[0].best_block_info().1);
 		connect_blocks(&nodes[1], height - nodes[1].best_block_info().1);
 		connect_blocks(&nodes[2], height - nodes[2].best_block_info().1);
-	}, || {}, true, Some(17), None, None);
+	}, || {}, false, Some(0x4000 | 15), None, None);
 
 	run_onion_failure_test("final_incorrect_cltv_expiry", 1, &nodes, &route, &payment_hash, &payment_secret, |_| {}, || {
 		for (_, pending_forwards) in nodes[1].node.forward_htlcs.lock().unwrap().iter_mut() {
@@ -1099,11 +1099,14 @@ fn test_phantom_failure_too_low_cltv() {
 	commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[0], nodes[1], update_1.commitment_signed, false);
 
 	// Ensure the payment fails with the expected error.
-	let error_data = Vec::new();
+	let mut error_data = recv_value_msat.to_be_bytes().to_vec();
+	error_data.extend_from_slice(
+		&nodes[0].node.best_block.read().unwrap().height().to_be_bytes(),
+	);
 	let mut fail_conditions = PaymentFailedConditions::new()
 		.blamed_scid(phantom_scid)
-		.expected_htlc_error_data(17, &error_data);
-	expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, false, fail_conditions);
+		.expected_htlc_error_data(0x4000 | 15, &error_data);
+	expect_payment_failed_conditions(&nodes[0], payment_hash, true, fail_conditions);
 }
 
 #[test]