Skip to content

Commit a6a6b48

Browse files
committed
Add tests to check the introduced behaviour
- The first test make sure that the OutboundV1Channel is not immediately removed when peers disconnect, but is removed after N timer ticks. - The second test makes sure that the SendOpenChannel is rebroadcasted for the OutboundV1Channel if peer reconnects within time.
1 parent ddf75af commit a6a6b48

File tree

1 file changed

+84
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+84
-0
lines changed

lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs

+84
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -10513,6 +10513,90 @@ fn test_remove_expired_inbound_unfunded_channels() {
1051310513
check_closed_event(&nodes[1], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, false, &[nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
1051410514
}
1051510515

10516+
#[test]
10517+
fn test_channel_close_when_not_timely_accepted() {
10518+
// Create network of two nodes
10519+
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
10520+
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
10521+
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
10522+
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
10523+
10524+
// Simulate peer-disconnects mid-handshake
10525+
// The channel is initiated from the node 0 side,
10526+
// but the nodes disconnect before node 1 could send accept channel
10527+
let create_chan_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
10528+
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10529+
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
10530+
10531+
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10532+
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10533+
10534+
// Make sure that we have not removed the OutboundV1Channel from node[0] immediately.
10535+
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
10536+
10537+
// Since channel was inbound from node[1] perspective, it should have been dropped immediately.
10538+
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
10539+
10540+
// In the meantime, some time passes.
10541+
for _ in 0..UNFUNDED_CHANNEL_AGE_LIMIT_TICKS {
10542+
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
10543+
}
10544+
10545+
// Since we disconnected from peer and did not connect back within time,
10546+
// we should have forced-closed the channel by now.
10547+
check_closed_event!(nodes[0], 1, ClosureReason::HolderForceClosed, [nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id()], 100000);
10548+
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
10549+
10550+
{
10551+
// Since accept channel message was never received
10552+
// The channel should be forced close by now from node 0 side
10553+
// and the peer removed from per_peer_state
10554+
let node_0_per_peer_state = nodes[0].node.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
10555+
assert_eq!(node_0_per_peer_state.len(), 0);
10556+
}
10557+
}
10558+
10559+
#[test]
10560+
fn test_rebroadcast_open_channel_when_reconnect_mid_handshake() {
10561+
// Create network of two nodes
10562+
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
10563+
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
10564+
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
10565+
let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
10566+
10567+
// Simulate peer-disconnects mid-handshake
10568+
// The channel is initiated from the node 0 side,
10569+
// but the nodes disconnect before node 1 could send accept channel
10570+
let create_chan_id = nodes[0].node.create_channel(nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), 100000, 10001, 42, None, None).unwrap();
10571+
let open_channel_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10572+
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
10573+
10574+
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
10575+
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
10576+
10577+
// Make sure that we have not removed the OutboundV1Channel from node[0] immediately.
10578+
assert_eq!(nodes[0].node.list_channels().len(), 1);
10579+
10580+
// Since channel was inbound from node[1] perspective, it should have been immediately dropped.
10581+
assert_eq!(nodes[1].node.list_channels().len(), 0);
10582+
10583+
// The peers now reconnect
10584+
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
10585+
features: nodes[1].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
10586+
}, true).unwrap();
10587+
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init {
10588+
features: nodes[0].node.init_features(), networks: None, remote_network_address: None
10589+
}, false).unwrap();
10590+
10591+
// Make sure the SendOpenChannel message is added to node_0 pending message events
10592+
let msg_events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events();
10593+
assert_eq!(msg_events.len(), 1);
10594+
match &msg_events[0] {
10595+
MessageSendEvent::SendOpenChannel { msg, .. } => assert_eq!(msg, &open_channel_msg),
10596+
_ => panic!("Unexpected message."),
10597+
}
10598+
}
10599+
1051610600
fn do_test_multi_post_event_actions(do_reload: bool) {
1051710601
// Tests handling multiple post-Event actions at once.
1051810602
// There is specific code in ChannelManager to handle channels where multiple post-Event

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)