[lldb] Fix incorrect uses of logical operator in 'if' condition check (NFC) (#94779)

The condition checking for missing class name, interpreter dictionary,
and script object incorrectly used logical AND (&&), which could never
be true to enter the 'if' block.

This commit uses separate if conditions for each class name, interpreter
dictionary, and script object.

Cought by cppcheck -

lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/Interfaces/ScriptedPythonInterface.h:89:11:
warning: Identical inner 'if' condition is always true.
[identicalInnerCondition]

lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/Interfaces/ScriptedPythonInterface.h:91:16:
warning: Identical inner 'if' condition is always true.
[identicalInnerCondition]

Fix #89195

---------

Co-authored-by: Shivam Gupta <[email protected]>

Author: xgupta

lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/Interfaces/ScriptedPythonInterface.h

@@ -85,14 +85,15 @@ class ScriptedPythonInterface : virtual public ScriptedInterface {
     bool has_class_name = !class_name.empty();
     bool has_interpreter_dict =
         !(llvm::StringRef(m_interpreter.GetDictionaryName()).empty());
-    if (!has_class_name && !has_interpreter_dict && !script_obj) {
-      if (!has_class_name)
-        return create_error("Missing script class name.");
-      else if (!has_interpreter_dict)
-        return create_error("Invalid script interpreter dictionary.");
-      else
-        return create_error("Missing scripting object.");
-    }
+
+    if (!has_class_name)
+      return create_error("Missing script class name.");
+
+    if (!has_interpreter_dict)
+      return create_error("Invalid script interpreter dictionary.");
+
+    if (!script_obj)
+      return create_error("Missing scripting object.");
 
     Locker py_lock(&m_interpreter, Locker::AcquireLock | Locker::NoSTDIN,
                    Locker::FreeLock);