Skip to content

Returning correct FQN class when there is no explicit use in reflected class #36688

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor

Description (*)

Fixes an issue when no explicit use is defined. When doing so, Magento will return the current class name only without its full namespace which will lead to an error.

Related Pull Requests

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Fixes DataObjectProcessor reflection is not using FQN for return types #34903

Manual testing scenarios (*)

The manual testing scenario can be found in the issue and has been confirmed by the team.

Questions or comments

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • README.md files for modified modules are updated and included in the pull request if any README.md predefined sections require an update
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Dec 30, 2022

Hi @MeCapron. Thank you for your contribution
Here are some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento give me 2.4-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names. Allowed build names are:

  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE,
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests
  13. Semantic Version Checker

You can find more information about the builds here

ℹ️ Run only required test builds during development. Run all test builds before sending your pull request for review.

For more details, review the Magento Contributor Guide documentation.

⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all Pull Requests must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of Pull Requests happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot added Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: pending review labels Dec 30, 2022
@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run Static Tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run Static Tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

MeCapron commented Jan 1, 2023

@magento run Static Tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

MeCapron commented Jan 1, 2023

If someone from the team can tell me why does the static tests are failing ?

1) Magento\Test\Php\LiveCodeTest::testPhpStan
PHPStan detected violation(s):
 ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  Line   lib/internal/Magento/Framework/Reflection/Test/Unit/TypeProcessorTest  
         .php                                                                   
 ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  165    Class Magento\TestModule1\Service\V1\Entity\Item not found.            
         💡 Learn more at https://phpstan.org/user-guide/discovering-symbols    
 ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 

I have only updated the test, and the class seem to exist properly.

@MeCapron
Copy link
Contributor Author

@magento run all tests

@magento-automated-testing
Copy link

The requested builds are added to the queue. You should be able to see them here within a few minutes. Please re-request them if they don't show in a reasonable amount of time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DataObjectProcessor reflection is not using FQN for return types
1 participant