@raclim Please review my PR . I have updated the required changes.

@Harshit-7373 Maybe you Forget the mention Issue Number????????. It would be better to Provide issue number for the better tracking.

@Jatin24062005 Yes , I forgot to mention the issue number in the PR . I have now updated the PR description. The issue number is #3081

Thanks @Harshit-7373 for taking a look into this!

I think the general implementation here is correct! One other change that could've been helpful here is to have the text content align more with some of the suggestions within the attached issue.

Since this is a somewhat major outward facing change, I think we might need further discussion on how it's implemented, when it should be introduced to the community, and ensure it doesn't conflict with other changes that are happening within the p5.js library and p5.js editor. I think this comment mentions the discussion on the proposed guidelines around the describe() function that's happening within the p5.js library, which I think we might want to wait to see what's happening there before implementing here.

Since this might take more planning first and isn't ready to be implemented yet, I'm going to close this for now. However, please feel free to revisit this once the discussion on it has been settled!