Auto merge of #27378 - GuillaumeGomez:patch-2, r=brson

Part of #24407.
r? @Manishearth

Author: bors

src/librustc_resolve/diagnostics.rs

@@ -397,6 +397,114 @@ impl Bar {
 ```
 "##,
 
+E0412: r##"
+An undeclared type name was used. Example of erroneous codes:
+
+```
+impl Something {} // error: use of undeclared type name `Something`
+// or:
+trait Foo {
+    fn bar(N); // error: use of undeclared type name `N`
+}
+// or:
+fn foo(x: T) {} // error: use of undeclared type name `T`
+```
+
+To fix this error, please verify you didn't misspell the type name,
+you did declare it or imported it into the scope. Examples:
+
+```
+struct Something;
+
+impl Something {} // ok!
+// or:
+trait Foo {
+    type N;
+
+    fn bar(Self::N); // ok!
+}
+//or:
+fn foo<T>(x: T) {} // ok!
+```
+"##,
+
+E0413: r##"
+A declaration shadows an enum variant or unit-like struct in scope.
+Example of erroneous code:
+
+```
+struct Foo;
+
+let Foo = 12i32; // error: declaration of `Foo` shadows an enum variant or
+                 //        unit-like struct in scope
+```
+
+
+To fix this error, rename the variable such that it doesn't shadow any enum
+variable or structure in scope. Example:
+
+```
+struct Foo;
+
+let foo = 12i32; // ok!
+```
+
+Or:
+
+```
+struct FooStruct;
+
+let Foo = 12i32; // ok!
+```
+
+The goal here is to avoid a conflict of names.
+"##,
+
+E0415: r##"
+More than one function parameter have the same name. Example of erroneous
+code:
+
+```
+fn foo(f: i32, f: i32) {} // error: identifier `f` is bound more than
+                          //        once in this parameter list
+```
+
+Please verify you didn't misspell parameters' name. Example:
+
+```
+fn foo(f: i32, g: i32) {} // ok!
+```
+"##,
+
+E0416: r##"
+An identifier is bound more than once in a pattern. Example of erroneous
+code:
+
+```
+match (1, 2) {
+    (x, x) => {} // error: identifier `x` is bound more than once in the
+                 //        same pattern
+}
+```
+
+Please verify you didn't misspell identifiers' name. Example:
+
+```
+match (1, 2) {
+    (x, y) => {} // ok!
+}
+```
+
+Or maybe did you mean to unify? Consider using a guard:
+
+```
+match (A, B, C) {
+    (x, x2, see) if x == x2 => { /* A and B are equal, do one thing */ }
+    (y, z, see) => { /* A and B unequal; do another thing */ }
+}
+```
+"##,
+
 E0417: r##"
 A static variable was referenced in a pattern. Example of erroneous code:
 
@@ -425,6 +533,55 @@ match 0 {
 ```
 "##,
 
+E0419: r##"
+An unknown enum variant, struct or const was used. Example of
+erroneous code:
+
+```
+match 0 {
+    Something::Foo => {} // error: unresolved enum variant, struct
+                         //        or const `Foo`
+}
+```
+
+Please verify you didn't misspell it and the enum variant, struct or const has
+been declared and imported into scope. Example:
+
+```
+enum Something {
+    Foo,
+    NotFoo,
+}
+
+match Something::NotFoo {
+    Something::Foo => {} // ok!
+    _ => {}
+}
+```
+"##,
+
+E0423: r##"
+A `struct` variant name was used like a function name. Example of
+erroneous code:
+
+```
+struct Foo { a: bool};
+
+let f = Foo();
+// error: `Foo` is a struct variant name, but this expression uses
+//        it like a function name
+```
+
+Please verify you didn't misspell the name of what you actually wanted
+to use here. Example:
+
+```
+fn Foo() -> u32 { 0 }
+
+let f = Foo(); // ok!
+```
+"##,
+
 E0424: r##"
 The `self` keyword was used in a static method. Example of erroneous code:
 
@@ -582,6 +739,27 @@ use something_which_doesnt_exist;
 Please verify you didn't misspell the import's name.
 "##,
 
+E0435: r##"
+A non-constant value was used to initialise a constant. Example of erroneous
+code:
+
+```
+let foo = 42u32;
+const FOO : u32 = foo; // error: attempt to use a non-constant value in a
+                       //        constant
+```
+
+To fix this error, please replace the value with a constant. Example:
+
+```
+const FOO : u32 = 42u32; // ok!
+
+// or:
+const OTHER_FOO : u32 = 42u32;
+const FOO : u32 = OTHER_FOO; // ok!
+```
+"##,
+
 E0437: r##"
 Trait implementations can only implement associated types that are members of
 the trait in question. This error indicates that you attempted to implement
@@ -650,21 +828,12 @@ register_diagnostics! {
            // pattern #1
     E0410, // variable from pattern is not bound in pattern 1
     E0411, // use of `Self` outside of an impl or trait
-    E0412, // use of undeclared
-    E0413, // declaration of shadows an enum variant or unit-like struct in
-           // scope
     E0414, // only irrefutable patterns allowed here
-    E0415, // identifier is bound more than once in this parameter list
-    E0416, // identifier is bound more than once in the same pattern
     E0418, // is not an enum variant, struct or const
-    E0419, // unresolved enum variant, struct or const
     E0420, // is not an associated const
     E0421, // unresolved associated const
     E0422, // does not name a structure
-    E0423, // is a struct variant name, but this expression uses it like a
-           // function name
     E0427, // cannot use `ref` binding mode with ...
     E0429, // `self` imports are only allowed within a { } list
     E0434, // can't capture dynamic environment in a fn item
-    E0435, // attempt to use a non-constant value in a constant
 }

src/librustc_typeck/diagnostics.rs

@@ -1233,6 +1233,48 @@ fn main() {
 ```
 "##,
 
+E0102: r##"
+You hit this error because the compiler lacks information to
+determine a type for this variable. Erroneous code example:
+
+```
+fn demo(devil: fn () -> !) {
+    let x: &_ = devil();
+    // error: cannot determine a type for this local variable
+}
+
+fn oh_no() -> ! { panic!("the devil is in the details") }
+
+fn main() {
+    demo(oh_no);
+}
+```
+
+To solve this situation, constrain the type of the variable.
+Examples:
+
+```
+fn some_func(x: &u32) {
+    // some code
+}
+
+fn demo(devil: fn () -> !) {
+    let x: &u32 = devil();
+    // Here we defined the type at the variable creation
+
+    let x: &_ = devil();
+    some_func(x);
+    // Here, the type is determined by the function argument type
+}
+
+fn oh_no() -> ! { panic!("the devil is in the details") }
+
+fn main() {
+    demo(oh_no);
+}
+```
+"##,
+
 E0106: r##"
 This error indicates that a lifetime is missing from a type. If it is an error
 inside a function signature, the problem may be with failing to adhere to the
@@ -2496,7 +2538,6 @@ register_diagnostics! {
     E0085,
     E0086,
     E0090,
-    E0102,
     E0103,
     E0104,
     E0118,