You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rollup merge of #72540 - davidtwco:issue-67552-mono-collector-comparison, r=varkor
mir: adjust conditional in recursion limit check
Fixes#67552.
This PR adjusts the condition used in the recursion limit check of
the monomorphization collector, from `>` to `>=`.
In #67552, the test case had infinite indirect recursion, repeating a
handful of functions (from the perspective of the monomorphization
collector): `rec` -> `identity` -> `Iterator::count` -> `Iterator::fold`
-> `Iterator::next` -> `rec`.
During this process, `resolve_associated_item` was invoked for
`Iterator::fold` (during the construction of an `Instance`), and
ICE'd due to substitutions needing inference. However, previous
iterations of this recursion would have called this function for
`Iterator::fold` - and did! - and succeeded in doing so (trivially
checkable from debug logging, `()` is present where `_` is in the substs
of the failing execution).
The expected outcome of this test case would be a recursion limit error
(which is present when the `identity` fn indirection is removed), and
the recursion depth of `rec` is increasing (other functions finish
collecting their neighbours and thus have their recursion depths reset).
When the ICE occurs, the recursion depth of `rec` is 256 (which matches
the recursion limit), which suggests perhaps that a different part of
the compiler is using a `>=` comparison and returning a different result
on this recursion rather than what it returned in every previous
recursion, thus stopping the monomorphization collector from reporting
an error on the next recursion, where `recursion_depth_of_rec > 256`
would have been true.
With grep and some educated guesses, we can determine that
the recursion limit check at line 818 in
`src/librustc_trait_selection/traits/project.rs` is the other check that
is using a different comparison. Modifying either comparison to be `>` or
`>=` respectively will fix the error, but changing the monomorphization
collector produces the nicer error.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: src/test/ui/dropck/dropck_no_diverge_on_nonregular_1.stderr
+2-2
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@ error[E0320]: overflow while adding drop-check rules for FingerTree<i32>
4
4
LL | let ft =
5
5
| ^^
6
6
|
7
-
= note: overflowed on FingerTree<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<i32>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
7
+
= note: overflowed on FingerTree<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<i32>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
8
8
9
9
error[E0320]: overflow while adding drop-check rules for FingerTree<i32>
= note: overflowed on FingerTree<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<i32>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
15
+
= note: overflowed on FingerTree<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<Node<i32>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
0 commit comments