Skip to content

Add a missing field to the RLS config #46324

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add a missing field to the RLS config #46324

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

martinlindhe
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes bug introduced in #46011 and reported in #46244

Fixes bug introduced in #46011 and reported in #46244
@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 28, 2017
@@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ fn main() {
cmd.env("RUST_SAVE_ANALYSIS_CONFIG",
"{\"output_file\": null,\"full_docs\": false,\
\"pub_only\": true,\"reachable_only\": false,\
\"distro_crate\": true,\"signatures\": false,\"borrow_data\": false}");
\"distro_crate\": true,\"signatures\": false,\"borrow_data\": false,\
\"reachable_only\": false}");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reachable_only is declared twice.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My mistake. Started looking at an older git checkout which didn't have 794ada0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants