Skip to content

Commit 806244f

Browse files
jhprattAmanieu
authored andcommitted
Remove use of #[rustc_deprecated]
1 parent 1080254 commit 806244f

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-8
lines changed

1 file changed

+8
-8
lines changed

crates/core_arch/src/x86/eflags.rs

+8-8
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ use crate::arch::asm;
88
#[cfg(target_arch = "x86")]
99
#[inline(always)]
1010
#[stable(feature = "simd_x86", since = "1.27.0")]
11-
#[rustc_deprecated(
11+
#[deprecated(
1212
since = "1.29.0",
13-
reason = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
13+
note = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
1414
)]
1515
#[doc(hidden)]
1616
pub unsafe fn __readeflags() -> u32 {
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ pub unsafe fn __readeflags() -> u32 {
2525
#[cfg(target_arch = "x86_64")]
2626
#[inline(always)]
2727
#[stable(feature = "simd_x86", since = "1.27.0")]
28-
#[rustc_deprecated(
28+
#[deprecated(
2929
since = "1.29.0",
30-
reason = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
30+
note = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
3131
)]
3232
#[doc(hidden)]
3333
pub unsafe fn __readeflags() -> u64 {
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@ pub unsafe fn __readeflags() -> u64 {
4242
#[cfg(target_arch = "x86")]
4343
#[inline(always)]
4444
#[stable(feature = "simd_x86", since = "1.27.0")]
45-
#[rustc_deprecated(
45+
#[deprecated(
4646
since = "1.29.0",
47-
reason = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
47+
note = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
4848
)]
4949
#[doc(hidden)]
5050
pub unsafe fn __writeeflags(eflags: u32) {
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ pub unsafe fn __writeeflags(eflags: u32) {
5757
#[cfg(target_arch = "x86_64")]
5858
#[inline(always)]
5959
#[stable(feature = "simd_x86", since = "1.27.0")]
60-
#[rustc_deprecated(
60+
#[deprecated(
6161
since = "1.29.0",
62-
reason = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
62+
note = "See issue #51810 - use inline assembly instead"
6363
)]
6464
#[doc(hidden)]
6565
pub unsafe fn __writeeflags(eflags: u64) {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)