Skip to content

Refactor variancetk #5926

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prajjwalbajpai
Copy link
Contributor

@prajjwalbajpai prajjwalbajpai commented Mar 9, 2025

Resolves #5690.

Description

This pull request:

  • Refactors and adds protocol support to stats/base/variancetk as described in the issue.

  • Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines


@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Mar 9, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

  1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

  2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

    - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

  • The developer's certificate of origin
  • Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

Copy link
Contributor

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 Hi there! 👋

And thank you for opening your first pull request! We will review it shortly. 🏃 💨

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Mar 9, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/variancetk $\color{red}271/275$
$\color{green}+98.55\%$
$\color{red}19/21$
$\color{green}+90.48\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{red}271/275$
$\color{green}+98.55\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@prajjwalbajpai prajjwalbajpai marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2025 14:16
Added accessor tests for refactoring variancetk

Fixes: stdlib-js#5690
Co-authored-by: Prajjwal Bajpai <[email protected]>

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@prajjwalbajpai
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aayush0325 please review

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. label Mar 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: refactor and add protocol support to stats/base/variancetk
2 participants