Serp linkedin finder enrichment source #2664
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the modification of member enrichment services to accommodate a new data structure focused on enrichable members. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
| public platform = `enrichment-${this.source}` | ||
|
|
||
| public enrichableBySql = ` | ||
| (members."displayName" like '% %') AND |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the idea? People with a space in their name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah, people with multiple-word names. Single-word names are not good enough when searching in google.
But now I'm thinking, since we're already using other stuff to distinguish (like website, location w/e), maybe we can remove this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the test results with one-word display names aren't great.
- With multiple-word names, the correctness using GitHub identities in queries was %92.4, when using single-word names it dropped to %65
- With multiple word names, queries with the website had correctness of %100, when using single-word names it dropped to %75
I'm keeping this for now, since it's more important to have more correct answers than more enrichable members
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts (1)
18-24: Add JSDoc documentation and consider optional fields.
The interface structure looks good, but consider:
- Adding JSDoc documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this interface
- Making fields like
location,website, and potentiallydisplayNameoptional as they might not always be available
+/**
+ * Represents a member that can be enriched with additional data from various sources.
+ * This interface defines the minimum required data for enrichment operations.
+ */
export interface IEnrichableMember {
id: string
tenantId: string
displayName: string
- location: string
- website: string
+ location?: string
+ website?: string
identities: IMemberIdentity[]
}services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts (3)
1-3: Add JSDoc documentation and URL validation.
Consider adding documentation and type validation to improve maintainability and data integrity.
+/**
+ * Represents enriched member data from SERP API containing LinkedIn profile URL.
+ */
export interface IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp {
+ /** LinkedIn profile URL of the member. Must be a valid linkedin.com URL. */
linkedinUrl: string
}5-8: Add JSDoc documentation for the API response interface.
Consider adding documentation to clarify the purpose and structure of the SERP API response.
+/**
+ * Represents the complete response structure from the SERP API.
+ */
export interface IMemberEnrichmentSerpApiResponse {
+ /** Array of organic search results. */
organic_results: IMemberEnrichmentSerpApiResponseOrganicResult[]
+ /** Metadata about the search query and results. */
search_information: IMemberEnrichmentSerpApiResponseSearchInformation
}34-37: Add documentation for inline sitelinks interface.
Consider adding JSDoc documentation to clarify the purpose of inline sitelinks.
+/**
+ * Represents an inline sitelink that appears under a search result.
+ */
export interface IMemberEnrichmentSerpApiResponseOrganicResultSitelinkInline {
+ /** Title of the inline link. */
title: string
+ /** URL of the inline link. */
link: string
}services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (1)
Line range hint 93-93: Address the TODO for data squashing implementation.
The TODO comment indicates missing implementation for a critical feature - data squashing using LLM and member entity enrichment logic.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this implementation task? I can provide a detailed specification for the LLM-based data squasher implementation.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts (3)
30-30: Consider parameterizing the SQL condition.
The hardcoded SQL condition could be vulnerable to SQL injection if not properly sanitized by the caller. Consider parameterizing it or using an ORM-safe format.
Example approach:
public readonly enrichableBySql = {
conditions: ['type = :emailType', 'verified = :isVerified'],
parameters: {
emailType: 'email',
isVerified: true
}
};Line range hint 64-78: Enhance error logging for better observability.
While the error handling is good, we could improve the logging to include more context about the failed request.
if (axios.isAxiosError(err)) {
this.log.warn(
- `Axios error occurred while getting clearbit data: ${err.response?.status} - ${err.response?.statusText}`,
+ `Axios error occurred while getting clearbit data for email: ${email}, status: ${err.response?.status} - ${err.response?.statusText}`,
+ {
+ error: err.message,
+ stack: err.stack,
+ config: {
+ url: err.config?.url,
+ method: err.config?.method,
+ }
+ }
)
throw new Error(`Clearbit enrichment request failed with status: ${err.response?.status}`)
}Line range hint 55-62: Consider adding request timeout configuration.
The Axios request configuration doesn't specify a timeout, which could lead to hanging requests in case of API issues.
const config = {
method: 'get',
url,
params: {
email,
},
+ timeout: 5000, // 5 seconds timeout
headers: {
Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_CLEARBIT_API_KEY']}`,
},services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/progai/service.ts (3)
35-36: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comment.
The SQL condition correctly reflects the enrichment criteria for verified GitHub usernames and email identities, matching the logic in isEnrichableBySource.
Consider adding a JSDoc comment to document the SQL condition:
+/**
+ * SQL condition to identify enrichable members:
+ * - Must have verified identity
+ * - Must have either GitHub username or email
+ */
enrichableBySql = `mi.verified and ((mi.type = 'username' AND mi.platform = 'github') OR (mi.type = 'email'))`Line range hint 279-309: Improve error handling and API configuration.
Several improvements can be made to the API calls:
- The generic error handling loses valuable context about API failures
- Missing timeout configuration could lead to hanging requests
- Environment variables should be validated
- API configuration is duplicated between methods
Consider applying these improvements:
+ private readonly API_TIMEOUT = 10000; // 10 seconds
+
+ private getApiConfig(params: Record<string, string>) {
+ const apiKey = process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_API_KEY'];
+ const apiUrl = process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_URL'];
+
+ if (!apiKey || !apiUrl) {
+ throw new Error('Missing required environment variables for ProgAI API');
+ }
+
+ return {
+ method: 'get',
+ url: `${apiUrl}/get_profile`,
+ params: {
+ ...params,
+ with_emails: true,
+ api_key: apiKey,
+ },
+ timeout: this.API_TIMEOUT,
+ };
+ }
async getDataUsingGitHubHandle(githubUsername: string): Promise<IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAI> {
try {
- const url = `${process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_URL']}/get_profile`
- const config = {
- method: 'get',
- url,
- params: {
- github_handle: githubUsername,
- with_emails: true,
- api_key: process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_API_KEY'],
- },
- headers: {},
- }
+ const config = this.getApiConfig({ github_handle: githubUsername });
const response = (await axios(config)).data
+ return response.profile;
} catch (err) {
- throw new Error(err)
+ if (axios.isAxiosError(err)) {
+ throw new Error(
+ `ProgAI API error for GitHub handle ${githubUsername}: ${err.message}` +
+ (err.response?.data ? ` - ${JSON.stringify(err.response.data)}` : '')
+ );
+ }
+ throw err;
}
- return response.profile
}
async getDataUsingEmailAddress(email: string): Promise<IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAI> {
try {
- const url = `${process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_URL']}/get_profile`
- const config = {
- method: 'get',
- url,
- params: {
- email,
- with_emails: true,
- api_key: process.env['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_API_KEY'],
- },
- headers: {},
- }
+ const config = this.getApiConfig({ email });
const response = (await axios(config)).data
- return response.profile
+ return response.profile;
} catch (err) {
- throw new Error(err)
+ if (axios.isAxiosError(err)) {
+ throw new Error(
+ `ProgAI API error for email ${email}: ${err.message}` +
+ (err.response?.data ? ` - ${JSON.stringify(err.response.data)}` : '')
+ );
+ }
+ throw err;
}
}Line range hint 127-277: Add defensive programming to data normalization.
The normalization logic could benefit from additional safety checks to prevent runtime errors:
- Input data structure validation
- Null checks for nested objects
- Type guards for array operations
Consider applying these improvements:
private fillSkills(
data: IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAI,
normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized,
): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized {
if (!normalized.attributes) {
normalized.attributes = {}
}
- if (data.skills) {
+ if (Array.isArray(data.skills) && data.skills.length > 0) {
if (!normalized.attributes.skills) {
normalized.attributes.skills = {}
}
normalized.attributes[MemberAttributeName.SKILLS].enrichment = lodash.uniq([
...lodash
.orderBy(data.skills || [], ['weight'], ['desc'])
.map((s: IEnrichmentAPISkillsProgAI) => s.skill),
])
}
return normalized
}
private normalizeEmployment(
data: IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAI,
normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized,
): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized {
- if (data.work_experiences) {
+ if (Array.isArray(data.work_experiences) && data.work_experiences.length > 0) {
for (const workExperience of data.work_experiences) {
+ if (!workExperience?.company) {
+ this.log.warn('Skipping work experience without company name');
+ continue;
+ }
const identities = []
if (workExperience.companyUrl) {
identities.push({
platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN,
value: workExperience.companyUrl,
type: OrganizationIdentityType.PRIMARY_DOMAIN,
verified: true,
})
}
- if (workExperience.companyLinkedInUrl) {
+ if (workExperience.companyLinkedInUrl?.includes('/')) {
identities.push({
platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN,
value: `company:${workExperience.companyLinkedInUrl.split('/').pop()}`,
type: OrganizationIdentityType.USERNAME,
verified: true,
})
}
normalized.memberOrganizations.push({
name: workExperience.company,
source: OrganizationSource.ENRICHMENT_PROGAI,
identities,
title: workExperience.title,
startDate: workExperience.startDate,
endDate: workExperience.endDate,
})
}
}
return normalized
}services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (1)
50-52: Handle Potential Null Values in JSON Attributes
When selecting location and website from members.attributes, there's a possibility that these fields are NULL if they don't exist.
Consider using COALESCE to provide default values and prevent NULL results:
- members.attributes->'location'->>'default' as location,
- members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' as website,
+ COALESCE(members.attributes->'location'->>'default', '') as location,
+ COALESCE(members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default', '') as website,This change ensures that the query returns empty strings instead of NULL when the attributes are missing.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts (2 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/factory.ts (2 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/progai/service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts (2 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (3 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts (1 hunks)
- services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (4 hunks)
- services/libs/types/src/enums/enrichment.ts (1 hunks)
- services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
services/libs/types/src/enums/enrichment.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! The enum addition follows consistent patterns.
The new SERP member follows the established naming and value conventions of the enum.
Let's verify the enum usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The SERP enum member is properly integrated and used consistently across the codebase
The verification shows the enum is correctly used in:
- Factory pattern for service instantiation in
members_enrichment_worker/factory.ts - Service implementation in
members_enrichment_worker/sources/serp/service.ts - Workflow configuration in
members_enrichment_worker/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of MemberEnrichmentSource.SERP
# Expected: Should find usage in EnrichmentServiceSerpApi and potentially in tests/configs
# Search for direct enum usage
rg "MemberEnrichmentSource.SERP" -A 3
# Search for string literal usage to catch any hardcoded values
rg "'serp'" -A 3
Length of output: 1511
services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts (1)
1-2: LGTM! Import statements are clean and focused.
The imports correctly reflect the types needed for the updated interfaces.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts (3)
2-6: LGTM! Clean type imports.
The imports are correctly updated to include IEnrichableMember and related types from the @crowd/types package.
14-16: Verify the impact of return type change.
The function signature has been updated to return Promise<IEnrichableMember[]> instead of Promise<IMember[]>. While this change aligns with the type transition, we should verify that all consumers of this function are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of getMembers function specifically.
Return type change is safe and properly scoped
The change from Promise<IMember[]> to Promise<IEnrichableMember[]> in getMembers.ts is safe because:
- The function is only imported and used within the members_enrichment_worker service
- The only direct usage is in
getMembersToEnrich.tsworkflow, which is designed to handle enrichable members - The
IEnrichableMembertype is properly defined in the shared types library and used consistently within the enrichment context
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of getMembers function to ensure they handle the new return type correctly
# Expected: All callers should expect IEnrichableMember[] instead of IMember[]
# Search for direct function calls
rg -l "getMembers\(" | xargs rg -A 5 "getMembers\("
# Search for type declarations or assignments that might need updates
rg -l "IMember\[\]" | xargs rg "IMember\[\]"
Length of output: 2564
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct function calls to getMembers
ast-grep --pattern 'getMembers($$$)'
# Search for imports of getMembers
rg 'import.*getMembers'
# Search for any references to IEnrichableMember type
rg 'IEnrichableMember'
Length of output: 4278
16-24: Verify SQL enrichment criteria implementation.
The change from enrichableBy to enrichableBySql suggests a shift to SQL-based filtering. Let's ensure the SQL conditions are properly implemented in the enrichment services.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the enrichment services implementation.
Let me check the interface definition to ensure all required properties are properly implemented.
SQL enrichment criteria properly implemented across all services
Each enrichment service (SERP, ProgAI, and Clearbit) correctly implements the enrichableBySql property with appropriate SQL conditions:
- Clearbit: Requires verified emails (
mi.type = 'email' and mi.verified) - ProgAI: Requires verified GitHub usernames or emails (
mi.verified and ((mi.type = 'username' AND mi.platform = 'github') OR (mi.type = 'email'))) - SERP: Requires display names with spaces (
(members."displayName" like '% %'))
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all enrichment services properly implement the enrichableBySql property
# Expected: Each service should define valid SQL conditions
# Search for enrichment service implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements IEnrichmentService {
$$$
enrichableBySql
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2564
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for enrichment service implementations and their enrichableBySql property
rg -A 5 "class.*implements IEnrichmentService"
# Also search for the interface definition
rg "interface IEnrichmentService"
Length of output: 2526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the interface definition with context
rg -A 10 "interface IEnrichmentService" services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts
# Also check for the MemberEnrichmentSource enum
rg -A 10 "enum MemberEnrichmentSource"
Length of output: 868
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts (1)
1-37: Overall structure looks good!
The interfaces provide a comprehensive type-safe structure for handling SERP API responses. The suggested improvements focus on documentation and type refinements but the core implementation is solid.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/factory.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The import follows the established pattern and correctly imports from the local sources directory.
25-26: LGTM! Well-structured service integration.
The SERP API service case is properly integrated into the factory pattern, maintaining consistency with existing implementations and preserving error handling.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts (2)
Line range hint 37-52: Consider optimizing child workflow timeouts.
With the addition of SERP as a third enrichment source, the current 15-minute timeout for child workflows might need adjustment. Each source could potentially use its full retry window, leading to timeout issues.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check timeout configurations across enrichment sources
# Look for timeout configurations in enrichment services
# Search for timeout configurations
rg -A 2 "timeout|retry" --type ts
# Look for any existing timing issues in error logs
rg -i "timeout|deadline exceeded" --type tsConsider:
- Adjusting the workflow timeout based on the number of active sources
- Implementing source-specific timeouts
- Adding monitoring for timing patterns to optimize these values
25-29: LGTM! Verify source processing order.
The addition of MemberEnrichmentSource.SERP aligns with the PR objectives. However, let's verify a few things:
Consider adding a type annotation for the sources array to explicitly show it's MemberEnrichmentSource[].
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the enrichment sources implementation.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
No source order dependencies found - LGTM!
The order of sources in the array doesn't affect the enrichment process because:
- Each source has its own independent enrichment criteria defined in
enrichableBySql - Sources are processed sequentially in a
forloop inenrichMember.tswhere each enrichment is independent - The implementation shows each source (PROGAI, CLEARBIT, SERP) operates autonomously with its own service class and enrichment logic
The type annotation suggestion was a nitpick and not critical since TypeScript can infer the type from the enum values.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any source order dependencies in the enrichment process
# Look for comments, constants, or configuration that might indicate ordering requirements
# Check for order-related comments or configuration
rg -i "source.*order|priority|sequence" --type ts
# Check the implementation of enrichment sources
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $EnrichmentService {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 113982
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for enrichment source implementations and any order dependencies
rg -A 5 "class.*implements.*EnrichmentService" --type ts
# Look for any source ordering logic in the enrichment process
rg -A 5 "MemberEnrichmentSource" --type ts
Length of output: 27073
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts (4)
14-14: LGTM: Import follows consistent pattern
The new SERP types import follows the established pattern used for other enrichment data sources.
25-28: LGTM: Type union properly extended
The addition of IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp to the union type maintains consistency with the existing pattern while extending support for the new SERP enrichment source.
39-40: Verify impact of switching to SQL-based enrichment criteria
The change from enrichableBy array to enrichableBySql string represents a significant architectural shift. While this approach offers more flexibility, we should ensure:
- All existing enrichment services have been updated to support this change
- The SQL queries are properly sanitized and optimized
- The documentation could be more detailed about the expected SQL format and usage
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all enrichment services have been updated to use enrichableBySql
# Expected: All enrichment services should define the enrichableBySql property
# Search for enrichment service implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements IEnrichmentService {
$$$
}'
# Search for any remaining usage of enrichableBy
rg "enrichableBy" --glob "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/**"Consider enhancing the comment to include:
- Expected SQL format and constraints
- Example usage
- Performance considerations
20-22: Verify usage of new enrichment input fields
The new optional fields (website, location, displayName) are valid additions for enrichment purposes. Let's verify their usage in the SERP enrichment service.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the SERP service implementation to verify the usage of these fields.
New enrichment fields are properly utilized in SERP service
The SERP enrichment service correctly implements and utilizes all three new optional fields:
- The
isEnrichableBySourcemethod validates thedisplayName,location, andwebsitefields - The
getDatamethod uses these fields in a prioritized enrichment strategy:- First attempts enrichment using website + location + displayName
- Falls back to GitHub identity if website attempt fails
- Finally tries email if previous attempts fail
- The SQL condition in
enrichableBySqlproperly references these fields from the database schema
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new fields are properly utilized in the SERP enrichment service
# Expected: Find usage of these fields in the SERP service implementation
# Search for usage of the new fields in SERP-related files
rg -A 5 "website|location|displayName" --glob "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/**"
Length of output: 800
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the SERP service implementation for enrichment logic
cat services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
# Also check for any test files that might verify these fields
fd test -e ts -e js --glob "**/serp/**"
Length of output: 6206
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (2)
3-8: LGTM! Import changes align with the type transition.
The imports are well-organized and correctly specify the required types for the enrichment workflow.
33-33: Verify all callers of enrichMember are updated.
The parameter type change from IMember to IEnrichableMember is a breaking change.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts (1)
30-30: Verify SQL condition alignment with enrichment logic.
The SQL condition mi.type = 'email' and mi.verified aligns well with the isEnrichableBySource method's logic, but let's ensure this is consistently applied throughout the enrichment flow.
✅ Verification successful
SQL condition correctly aligns with enrichment logic
The verification shows perfect alignment between the SQL condition and the enrichment logic:
enrichableBySql:mi.type = 'email' and mi.verifiedisEnrichableBySource: checks for!!input.email?.value
The implementation is consistent with other enrichment services in the codebase, each having their own specific verification logic:
- Serp: Requires display name, location, and verified identities
- ProgAI: Handles both GitHub and email identities
- Clearbit: Focuses solely on verified email identities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of email verification checks across the codebase
# Test 1: Check for other Clearbit-related SQL conditions
rg -l "type\s*=\s*'email'"
# Test 2: Check for other verification checks in enrichment services
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements IEnrichmentService {
$$$
isEnrichableBySource($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation details of these services to verify alignment
# Check the isEnrichableBySource implementations
rg -A 10 "isEnrichableBySource" services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/
# Check SQL conditions in these files
rg -A 2 "enrichableBySql" services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/
Length of output: 5182
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (2)
5-5: Import Consistency with Updated Interfaces
The addition of IEnrichableMember to the imports aligns with the updated return type of the fetchMembersForEnrichment function.
No issues found with this import statement.
20-20: Verify All Callers Adapted to Return Type Change
The function fetchMembersForEnrichment now returns a Promise<IEnrichableMember[]> instead of Promise<IMember[]>. This change may affect other parts of the codebase that rely on this function.
Run the following script to identify all usages of fetchMembersForEnrichment and ensure they handle the new return type correctly:
Review the identified code to confirm that it appropriately handles IEnrichableMember[].
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the implementation and usage context to verify this type change properly.
Let me check the actual implementation of the usage to verify how the return type is handled.
Return Type Change is Properly Handled
The verification shows that the return type change is correctly handled:
- The
getMembersfunction inservices/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.tsalready declares its return type asPromise<IEnrichableMember[]> - The variable
rowsis explicitly typed asIEnrichableMember[] - This is the only caller of
fetchMembersForEnrichmentin the codebase - The types are properly imported and aligned between the caller and the implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances where fetchMembersForEnrichment is called.
# Search for calls to fetchMembersForEnrichment
rg "fetchMembersForEnrichment\("
# Optionally, check for type inconsistencies using TypeScript compilation
# This requires that the project is set up with TypeScript
# npx tsc --noEmit
Length of output: 323
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation and usage context with surrounding lines
echo "=== Implementation ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 "fetchMembersForEnrichment\(" services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts
echo -e "\n=== Usage ==="
rg -B 5 -A 5 "fetchMembersForEnrichment\(" services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts
# Check the type definitions
echo -e "\n=== Type Definitions ==="
rg "interface (IMember|IEnrichableMember)"
Length of output: 7762
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of getMembers.ts to see how the return type is used
echo "=== GetMembers Activity Implementation ==="
cat services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts
# Get the interface definitions
echo -e "\n=== IEnrichableMember Interface ==="
rg -A 10 "interface IEnrichableMember" services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts
Length of output: 1455
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts (1)
18-24: Consider making some fields optional and adding documentation.
The interface structure is well-defined for member enrichment. However, consider:
- Making non-critical fields like
locationandwebsiteoptional as they might not always be available - Adding JSDoc comments to document the interface's purpose and field requirements
+/**
+ * Represents a member that can be enriched with additional data from external sources.
+ */
export interface IEnrichableMember {
id: string
tenantId: string
displayName: string
- location: string
- website: string
+ location?: string
+ website?: string
identities: IMemberIdentity[]
}services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-29: Add unit tests for the updated function.
Given this is a backend change and the PR requirements specify unit testing for new functionality, we should ensure proper test coverage.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for the following scenarios?
- Fetching members with different enrichment sources
- Handling of the new
enrichableBySqlproperty - Edge cases with empty sources array or invalid afterId
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts (1)
Line range hint 14-24: Consider batch size and monitoring implications
With the addition of SERP as a new enrichment source:
- Consider if the batch size of 100 members per run is still optimal, as each member now requires an additional API call
- Recommend adding monitoring for:
- SERP API quota usage
- Enrichment completion rates
- Processing time per member
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts (1)
39-40: Enhance documentation for SQL-based enrichment criteria
While the transition to SQL-based enrichment criteria (enrichableBySql) is a significant architectural change, the documentation could be more comprehensive. Consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments explaining:
- The expected SQL query format
- Performance implications
- Example usage
- Including validation requirements for SQL queries
Consider adding more detailed documentation:
- // what kind of custom sql should this source use as input
+ /**
+ * SQL query used to determine which members can be enriched by this source.
+ *
+ * Expected format: A valid SQL query that returns member IDs eligible for enrichment.
+ * The query should include appropriate indexes for optimal performance.
+ *
+ * @example
+ * SELECT id FROM members WHERE email IS NOT NULL AND updated_at < NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days'
+ */
enrichableBySql: stringservices/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (2)
58-60: Consider adding validation for new enrichment fields.
The new fields (displayName, website, location) enhance the enrichment data, but consider:
- Adding validation for the website format if present
- Documenting the expected format for these fields
- Handling undefined/null cases explicitly
Example validation:
website: input.website ? new URL(input.website).toString() : undefined,Line range hint 93-93: Implementation needed for data squashing logic.
The TODO comment indicates a missing critical component for data squashing using LLM. This functionality is essential for the enrichment process to work correctly.
Would you like me to:
- Generate a basic implementation for the data squasher?
- Create a GitHub issue to track this requirement?
- Provide an example of how to integrate LLM for data squashing?
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts (1)
Line range hint 82-91: Enhance error handling structure and types.
While the error logging is improved, consider these enhancements:
- Create custom error types for better error handling upstream
- Add specific handling for 404 and 422 status codes
- Include request context in error messages
Consider implementing these improvements:
class ClearbitEnrichmentError extends Error {
constructor(
message: string,
public readonly status?: number,
public readonly statusText?: string
) {
super(message);
this.name = 'ClearbitEnrichmentError';
}
}
// In catch block:
if (axios.isAxiosError(err)) {
const status = err.response?.status;
const statusText = err.response?.statusText;
if (status === 404) {
return null; // Member not found
}
if (status === 422) {
this.log.warn(`Invalid email format or other validation error: ${err.response?.data?.error}`);
return null;
}
throw new ClearbitEnrichmentError(
`Clearbit enrichment request failed`,
status,
statusText
);
}services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/progai/service.ts (3)
35-36: Consider adding type safety for SQL conditions.
The SQL-based approach is cleaner than the previous array-based implementation. However, to prevent potential runtime errors, consider:
- Creating a type-safe builder for SQL conditions
- Adding validation for the SQL string format
Example implementation:
// types.ts
type EnrichmentCondition = {
identityType: string;
platform?: string;
verified: boolean;
};
// utils/sql-builder.ts
class EnrichmentSqlBuilder {
static buildCondition(conditions: EnrichmentCondition[]): string {
return conditions
.map(c => `mi.verified and (mi.type = '${c.identityType}'${c.platform ? ` AND mi.platform = '${c.platform}'` : ''})`)
.join(' OR ');
}
}
// Usage in service.ts
enrichableBySql = EnrichmentSqlBuilder.buildCondition([
{ identityType: 'username', platform: 'github', verified: true },
{ identityType: 'email', verified: true }
]);Line range hint 279-320: Enhance error handling and API request configuration.
The current error handling is minimal and could be improved in several ways:
- Proper error classification for different failure scenarios
- Retry mechanism for transient failures
- Environment variable validation
- Request timeout configuration
Consider implementing these improvements:
import { retry } from '@crowd/common';
import { ConfigurationError, ApiError } from '@crowd/common';
private validateConfig() {
const required = ['CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_URL', 'CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_API_KEY'];
const missing = required.filter(key => !process.env[key]);
if (missing.length > 0) {
throw new ConfigurationError(`Missing required environment variables: ${missing.join(', ')}`);
}
}
private async makeRequest(params: Record<string, string>): Promise<IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAIResponse> {
const config = {
method: 'get',
url: `${process.env.CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_URL}/get_profile`,
params: {
...params,
with_emails: true,
api_key: process.env.CROWD_ENRICHMENT_PROGAI_API_KEY,
},
timeout: 5000, // 5 seconds
};
try {
return await retry(
async () => {
const response = await axios(config);
return response.data;
},
{
maxAttempts: 3,
backoff: 'exponential',
}
);
} catch (err) {
if (axios.isAxiosError(err)) {
if (err.response?.status === 401) {
throw new ApiError('Invalid API key', err);
}
if (err.response?.status === 404) {
return null;
}
throw new ApiError(`ProgAI API error: ${err.message}`, err);
}
throw err;
}
}
async getDataUsingGitHubHandle(githubUsername: string): Promise<IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAI> {
this.validateConfig();
const response = await this.makeRequest({ github_handle: githubUsername });
return response?.profile;
}
async getDataUsingEmailAddress(email: string): Promise<IMemberEnrichmentDataProgAI> {
this.validateConfig();
const response = await this.makeRequest({ email });
return response?.profile;
}Line range hint 214-225: Enhance LinkedIn URL parsing and validation.
The current LinkedIn handle extraction is simplistic and might break with different URL formats. Consider adding proper URL validation and handle extraction.
Here's a more robust implementation:
private extractLinkedinHandle(url: string): string | null {
try {
const linkedinUrl = new URL(url);
if (!linkedinUrl.hostname.includes('linkedin.com')) {
return null;
}
// Handle both /in/username and /company/name formats
const parts = linkedinUrl.pathname.split('/').filter(Boolean);
if (parts.length >= 2 && ['in', 'company'].includes(parts[0])) {
return parts[1];
}
return null;
} catch {
return null;
}
}
// Usage in fillPlatformData:
if (data.linkedin_url) {
const linkedinHandle = this.extractLinkedinHandle(data.linkedin_url);
if (linkedinHandle) {
normalized = normalizeSocialIdentity(
{
handle: linkedinHandle,
platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN,
},
MemberIdentityType.USERNAME,
true,
normalized,
);
}
}services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (1)
187-208: Simplify error handling in normalizeLinkedUrl
Catching the error and immediately rethrowing it does not add value and can be removed for cleaner code.
You can let the error propagate naturally:
- try {
// normalization logic
- } catch (error) {
- this.log.error('Error while normalizing LinkedIn URL', error)
- throw error
- }services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (2)
50-52: Handle Possible Null Values When Extracting JSON Attributes
In the SELECT statement, extracting location and website from members.attributes may result in NULL if these keys are absent:
members.attributes->'location'->>'default' as location,
members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' as website,Suggestion:
- Use COALESCE: Modify the query to use
COALESCEto provide default values if the attributes areNULL.
Example:
members."displayName",
- members.attributes->'location'->>'default' as location,
+ COALESCE(members.attributes->'location'->>'default', '') as location,
- members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' as website,
+ COALESCE(members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default', '') as website,Line range hint 24-44: Improve Readability of SQL Condition Construction
The logic for building enrichableBySqlConditions and enrichableBySqlJoined can be simplified for better readability:
Suggestion:
-
Combine Condition Building:
const enrichableBySqlConditions = sourceInputs.map( (input) => `(${input.enrichableBySql})` ) const enrichableBySqlJoined = enrichableBySqlConditions.length > 0 ? `(${enrichableBySqlConditions.join(' OR ')})` : ''
-
Inline Conditions in Query: If possible, incorporate the conditions directly into the query with parameterization.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts (2 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/factory.ts (2 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/progai/service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts (1 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts (2 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (3 hunks)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts (1 hunks)
- services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (4 hunks)
- services/libs/types/src/enums/enrichment.ts (1 hunks)
- services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
services/libs/types/src/enums/enrichment.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! Verify integration points.
The new enum value follows the established naming convention and pattern.
Let's verify the integration points mentioned in the summary:
✅ Verification successful
Integration points verified successfully
The new SERP enum value is properly integrated across the codebase:
- Used as a source parameter in
getMembersfunction - Referenced in
getMembersToEnrichworkflow - Correctly implemented in the SERP API service with proper type imports
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new SERP enum is properly integrated across the codebase
# Test 1: Verify usage in getMembers function
echo "Checking getMembers function integration..."
rg -A 5 "MemberEnrichmentSource\[\]" "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts"
# Test 2: Verify usage in getMembersToEnrich workflow
echo "Checking getMembersToEnrich workflow integration..."
rg "MemberEnrichmentSource\.SERP" "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts"
# Test 3: Verify usage in the new SERP API service
echo "Checking SERP API service integration..."
rg "MemberEnrichmentSource" "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts"
Length of output: 1125
services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Import changes align with interface modifications.
The imports have been correctly updated to reflect the removal of the IMemberEnrichmentSourceEnrichableBy interface and support the new IEnrichableMember interface.
Line range hint 1-24: Verify type usage across dependent services.
Since this is a shared types file with significant changes, we should verify that all dependent services are properly using the new types.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the type usage to ensure a comprehensive verification.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:
Type changes appear to be properly aligned across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The new
enrichableBySqlproperty is already being used correctly in multiple enrichment services (serp, progai, clearbit) - All interfaces (
IMemberEnrichmentCache,IMemberEnrichmentSourceQueryInput,IEnrichableMember) are properly imported and used in the relevant services:- members_enrichment_worker service
- data-access-layer
No breaking changes or inconsistencies were found in the type usage across the dependent services.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for services using the old enrichableBy property
echo "Checking for old enrichableBy usage:"
rg "enrichableBy.*IMemberEnrichmentSourceEnrichableBy" --type ts
# Search for places that need to be updated to use IEnrichableMember
echo -e "\nChecking for IMember usage in enrichment contexts:"
rg "IMember.*enrich" --type ts
# Search for potential places to update with enrichableBySql
echo -e "\nChecking for potential enrichableBySql update locations:"
rg "enrichableBy.*=.*" --type ts
Length of output: 1313
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for IMemberEnrichmentSourceQueryInput usage
echo "Checking IMemberEnrichmentSourceQueryInput usage:"
rg "IMemberEnrichmentSourceQueryInput" --type ts -A 2
# Check for IMemberEnrichmentCache usage
echo -e "\nChecking IMemberEnrichmentCache usage:"
rg "IMemberEnrichmentCache" --type ts -A 2
# Check for IEnrichableMember usage
echo -e "\nChecking IEnrichableMember usage:"
rg "IEnrichableMember" --type ts -A 2
# Look for any enrichment-related imports from the types package
echo -e "\nChecking enrichment type imports:"
rg "from.*types.*enrichment'" --type ts
Length of output: 7370
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts (2)
2-6: LGTM! Import changes align with the new type system.
The replacement of IMember with IEnrichableMember in the imports is consistent with the broader refactoring effort across the codebase.
22-22: Property rename from enrichableBy to enrichableBySql needs validation.
The change from enrichableBy to enrichableBySql suggests a shift to SQL-based enrichment criteria. This is a significant architectural change that warrants careful review.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts (2)
10-17: LGTM! Well-structured search information interface.
The interface provides comprehensive search metadata with appropriate types and optional properties.
1-37: Verify consistency with other enrichment service implementations.
Let's ensure the type structure aligns with other enrichment services in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The SERP enrichment types are consistent with the codebase patterns
The type structure in types.ts follows the established patterns in the codebase:
- It uses similar interface naming conventions (
IMemberEnrichment*) - The data structure follows similar patterns seen in other enrichment services:
- Base data interface (
IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp) containing essential fields - Response interfaces with detailed API response structure
- Clear separation of concerns between data and response types
- Base data interface (
The implementation aligns with other enrichment services in the codebase, particularly with the patterns seen in the shared types (IMemberEnrichmentCache, IMemberEnrichmentSourceQueryInput) and organization enrichment structures.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar patterns in other enrichment services
echo "Searching for other enrichment interfaces..."
rg -t typescript "interface.*Enrichment.*Data" --glob "!**/serp/**"
echo "Checking for similar response structures..."
rg -t typescript "interface.*ApiResponse" --glob "!**/serp/**"
Length of output: 400
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with a different approach using ripgrep without typescript filter
echo "Searching for enrichment interfaces..."
rg "interface.*Enrichment.*Data" --type-not test
echo -e "\nChecking for similar response structures..."
rg "interface.*ApiResponse" --type-not test
echo -e "\nLooking for files related to enrichment..."
fd -e ts -e js enrichment
Length of output: 1300
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of relevant files to understand the patterns
echo "Checking enrichment types in services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts..."
cat services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts
echo -e "\nChecking member enrichment types..."
cat services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/lf-auth0/getEnrichmentLFAuth0.ts
echo -e "\nChecking organization enrichment types..."
cat services/apps/premium/organizations_enrichment_worker/src/activities/enrichment.ts
Length of output: 18443
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/factory.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM!
The import statement follows the existing pattern and is properly grouped with other service imports.
25-26: Verify if SERP service needs email configuration flags.
The EnrichmentServiceProgAI is instantiated with email-related configuration flags (ALSO_USE_EMAIL_IDENTITIES_FOR_ENRICHMENT, ENRICH_EMAIL_IDENTITIES), but EnrichmentServiceSerpApi is only passed the logger. Please verify if these flags should also be applied to the SERP service for consistency.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts (3)
25-29: LGTM: Clean addition of SERP enrichment source
The addition of MemberEnrichmentSource.SERP follows the existing pattern and is consistent with the file's purpose.
Line range hint 1-65: Verify unit test coverage
As per PR requirements, new backend functionality needs unit tests. Please ensure tests cover:
- Integration of the SERP enrichment source
- Error handling for SERP enrichment failures
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related test files
echo "Searching for related test files..."
fd -g '*test*.ts' -g '*spec*.ts' --exec grep -l "getMembersToEnrich\|SERP"Line range hint 41-54: Verify timeout settings for SERP enrichment
The addition of SERP as an enrichment source increases parallel processing load. Please verify:
- If the 15-minute workflow execution timeout is sufficient for SERP enrichment
- If the retry policy (10 attempts, exponential backoff) is appropriate for SERP API's rate limits and potential failures
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response since I have enough information about the SERP API implementation and timeout configurations across the codebase:
15-minute timeout is appropriate for SERP enrichment workflow
The current timeout setting is well-aligned with the SERP API implementation because:
- The SERP enrichment makes simple, focused Google search queries with a limit of 3 results per request
- The implementation includes proper error handling and retries (10 attempts with exponential backoff)
- Other similar enrichment workflows in the codebase also use 15-minute timeouts
- The SERP API calls are lightweight, only requesting basic search results without complex processing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SERP API configuration or documentation that might indicate expected response times
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,json,md}' -i 'serp.*api|serp.*timeout|serp.*rate.?limit'
Length of output: 348
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for SERP-related configurations and timeouts
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,json,md}' -i 'serp' -A 5 -B 5
# Also search for any workflow timeout configurations for comparison
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{ts,js,json,md}' 'workflowExecutionTimeout' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 38145
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts (3)
14-14: LGTM: New import for SERP API enrichment data type
The addition of IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp import aligns with the introduction of SERP API as a new enrichment source.
25-28: LGTM: Clean addition of SERP enrichment data type
The inclusion of IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp in the union type is well-structured and consistent with the new SERP API integration.
20-22: Verify handling of new input fields across enrichment services
The new optional fields (website, location, displayName) enhance the enrichment input structure. However, we should ensure they are properly handled by all enrichment service implementations.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the handling of these new fields.
Let me search for the actual implementations of enrichment services to verify how they handle these new fields.
New fields are properly handled by enrichment services
The new optional fields (website, location, displayName) are properly handled by the enrichment services, particularly in the SERP API service which makes extensive use of all three fields:
- The fields are properly null-checked using optional chaining (
?.) - SERP service has specific logic to handle different combinations of these fields
- The fields are used in a prioritized manner:
- First tries with website:
input.displayName && input.location && input.website - Then falls back to GitHub:
input.displayName && input.location && input.github - Finally tries with email:
input.displayName && input.location && input.email
- First tries with website:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that enrichment services properly handle the new input fields
# Search for implementations using these new fields
echo "Searching for usage of new input fields in enrichment services..."
rg -l "website.*location.*displayName" --type ts
# Look for potential null/undefined checks for these fields
echo "Checking for proper null/undefined handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'getData(input: IEnrichmentSourceInput) {
$$$
input.$_(website|location|displayName)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 413
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that implement IEnrichmentSourceInput interface
echo "Searching for files implementing IEnrichmentSourceInput..."
rg -l "IEnrichmentSourceInput" --type ts
# Search for getData implementations
echo "Looking for getData implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'getData(input: IEnrichmentSourceInput)'
# Search for any usage of these field names in TypeScript files
echo "Searching for individual field usages..."
rg "website|location|displayName" --type ts -C 2
Length of output: 266981
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for getData implementations in enrichment services
echo "Looking for getData implementations in enrichment services..."
rg -A 10 "getData\(input: IEnrichmentSourceInput\)" --type ts services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/
# Search for any usage of these fields in enrichment services
echo "Searching for field usage in enrichment services..."
rg "input\.(website|location|displayName)" --type ts services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/
Length of output: 5784
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (2)
3-8: LGTM! Import changes are well-structured.
The imports are properly organized and include the new IEnrichableMember type, which aligns with the function signature changes.
33-33: Verify consistent usage of IEnrichableMember type.
The change from IMember to IEnrichableMember looks good, but let's verify that this type is consistently used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that:
- The type
IEnrichableMemberis defined inservices/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.tsand is used in the enrichment workflow - The change from
IMembertoIEnrichableMemberin the workflow input parameter is consistent with the codebase IEnrichableMemberis a more specific interface used for enrichment purposes, containing only the necessary fields (id, tenantId, displayName) for enrichment- The type is used consistently in the enrichment workflow and related activities
The type change is appropriate and consistent with the codebase's usage patterns. The change from IMember to IEnrichableMember represents a refinement to use a more specific interface that contains only the fields needed for enrichment, following the interface segregation principle.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining IMember usages that should be IEnrichableMember
# and verify that IEnrichableMember is properly imported where needed
# Search for IMember usage in relevant files
echo "Checking for IMember usage in enrichment-related files:"
rg "IMember" -A 3 -B 3
# Search for IEnrichableMember usage
echo "Checking IEnrichableMember usage:"
rg "IEnrichableMember" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 369165
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-248: Add documentation and improve test coverage.
The implementation is solid but would benefit from:
- JSDoc documentation for complex data transformation methods
- Unit tests for edge cases in data normalization
- Type guards for nested response properties
Consider adding documentation for complex methods:
/**
* Normalizes member identities from Clearbit data.
* @param data - Raw Clearbit API response
* @param normalized - Partially normalized member data
* @returns Updated normalized member data with identities
*/
private normalizeIdentities(
data: IMemberEnrichmentDataClearbit,
normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized,
): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalizedLet's check the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files covering this service
rg -l "EnrichmentServiceClearbit" --type test30-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify SQL condition context and add NULL handling.
The SQL condition looks correct for filtering verified emails, but consider these improvements:
- Ensure the table alias 'mi' is always defined in the query context where this condition is used
- Add explicit NULL handling for the verified column
Consider this more robust SQL condition:
- public enrichableBySql = `mi.type = 'email' and mi.verified`
+ public enrichableBySql = `mi.type = 'email' and mi.verified = true`Let's verify the usage context:
✅ Verification successful
Let's search for the actual usage of this service class to understand the context better:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response as the context shows both the SQL condition's usage and its integration:
SQL condition is correctly used and properly handled
The enrichableBySql condition is:
- Used as part of a larger SQL query in
fetchMembersForEnrichmentwhere the table alias 'mi' is properly defined through an INNER JOIN with "memberIdentities" - Combined with other conditions using OR when multiple enrichment sources are used
- Consistently used across different enrichment services (Clearbit, ProgAI, SERP) with similar patterns for verified email checks
The current implementation is secure and handles the context correctly:
- Table alias 'mi' is always defined via proper JOIN
- NULL handling is implicit since
mi.verifiedevaluates to false for NULL values in PostgreSQL - The condition is used within a controlled query builder that properly sanitizes inputs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQL queries using the 'mi' alias to ensure it's properly defined
rg -l "(?i)from.*as\s+mi\b|join.*as\s+mi\b" --type ts
Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQL queries using the 'mi' alias with broader context
rg -A 5 -B 5 "mi\.type|mi\.verified" --type ts
# Also search for any SQL query definitions that might use this condition
rg -A 5 -B 5 "(?i)(select|from|where).*member.*info" --type ts
Length of output: 30970
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the service class definition and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends EnrichmentServiceClearbit'
# Find where this SQL condition is used
rg -A 5 -B 5 "enrichableBySql" --type ts
Length of output: 11937
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (1)
19-19: Previous concern about checking for spaces in display names
As previously noted by another reviewer, the condition (members."displayName" like '% %') checks for display names containing a space. Is this intentional? This may unintentionally exclude members with single-word names or include those that shouldn't be enriched.
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (1)
20-20: Update Function Return Type Consistently
The function fetchMembersForEnrichment now returns a Promise<IEnrichableMember[]>. Ensure that all callers of this function are updated to handle the new return type IEnrichableMember[] instead of the previous IMember[].
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/types.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ub.com:CrowdDotDev/crowd.dev into feature/serp-linkedin-finder-enrichment-source
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities.ts(2 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts(1 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts(2 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts(1 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/tests.ts(1 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts(2 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts(3 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts(1 hunks)services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/clearbit/service.ts
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/getMembersToEnrich.ts
- services/libs/types/src/premium/enrichment.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/tests.ts
[error] 61-63: This code is unreachable
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities/getMembers.ts (3)
2-6: LGTM! Import changes align with the type refactoring.
The imports are properly organized and reflect the transition from IMember to IEnrichableMember.
11-15: Function rename improves clarity.
The rename from getMembers to getEnrichableMembers better reflects the function's purpose and aligns with the type changes.
Note: Please refer to the existing review comment about updating dependent code to handle the IEnrichableMember[] return type.
Line range hint 16-27: Verify SQL-based enrichment implementation.
The change from enrichableBy to enrichableBySql suggests a shift to SQL-based enrichment criteria. Let's verify the implementation in enrichment services.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
SQL-based enrichment implementation is properly structured and consistent
The change from enrichableBy to enrichableBySql is part of a well-implemented system where:
- Each enrichment service (Clearbit, ProgAI, SERP) defines its own SQL conditions
- The conditions are properly integrated into the member fetching query
- No legacy
enrichableByreferences remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for enrichableBySql implementation in enrichment services
echo "Checking enrichment services implementation:"
rg -p "enrichableBySql" --type ts
# Search for any remaining enrichableBy references to ensure complete migration
echo -e "\nChecking for remaining enrichableBy references:"
rg -p "enrichableBy[^S]" --type ts
Length of output: 1419
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the SQL query construction and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'fetchMembersForEnrichment($$$)'
# Check the interface definition for IEnrichableMember
echo "Checking IEnrichableMember interface:"
rg -p "interface IEnrichableMember" -A 10 --type ts
# Check if there are any tests validating the SQL-based enrichment
echo -e "\nChecking for related tests:"
rg -p "describe.*enrichment.*sql" --type ts
Length of output: 1309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of fetchMembersForEnrichment
echo "Checking fetchMembersForEnrichment implementation:"
rg -p "fetchMembersForEnrichment" -B 2 -A 15 --type ts
# Check the EnrichmentSourceService implementations
echo -e "\nChecking EnrichmentSourceService base class or interface:"
rg -p "class.*EnrichmentSourceService|interface.*EnrichmentSourceService" -A 10 --type ts
Length of output: 2270
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/activities.ts (2)
11-11: LGTM! Import renamed to better reflect its purpose.
The rename from getMembers to getEnrichableMembers better describes the function's specific focus on enrichable members.
32-32: Verify usage of renamed export across the codebase.
The export has been renamed from getMembers to getEnrichableMembers. Let's ensure all consumers have been updated.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts (4)
14-14: LGTM: Import follows consistent pattern
The new import for SERP API types follows the established pattern used for other enrichment sources.
25-28: LGTM: Enrichment data type properly extended
The IMemberEnrichmentData union type has been correctly extended to include the new SERP enrichment data type, maintaining consistency with existing patterns.
39-42: Verify SQL implementation and enhance documentation
The transition to SQL-based filtering is a significant change that warrants careful review. While the comments provide basic context about table aliases, consider the following:
- The SQL approach could have performance implications depending on the query complexity
- Documentation could be enhanced with example SQL conditions
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify SQL implementation across enrichment services
# Expected: Find all implementations of enrichableBySql to ensure consistent usage
echo "Searching for enrichableBySql implementations..."
rg -t ts "enrichableBySql.*=.*" --glob "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/**"
echo "Checking for potential SQL injection vulnerabilities..."
ast-grep --pattern 'enrichableBySql = $_'Consider adding a code comment with an example SQL condition to help implementers:
// Example SQL condition:
// enrichableBySql = `
// members.email IS NOT NULL
// AND NOT EXISTS (
// SELECT 1 FROM member_enrichment_cache
// WHERE member_id = members.id
// AND source = 'example'
// )
// `20-22: Verify the usage of new enrichment input fields
The new optional fields enhance the enrichment input capabilities. However, let's verify their usage across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to search for the usage of these new fields.
New enrichment fields are properly utilized in the codebase
The new optional fields (website, location, and displayName) are actively used in the enrichment process, particularly in:
- SERP enrichment source (
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts) which uses all three fields for member lookup - Enrichment workflow (
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts) which properly handles these fields - Clearbit enrichment source which processes and normalizes the
displayNamefield
The fields are used in a backward-compatible way and serve their intended purpose of enhancing member enrichment capabilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new enrichment input fields
# Expected: Find implementations that utilize these new fields
# Search for usage of these fields in enrichment-related code
echo "Searching for usage of new fields in enrichment implementations..."
rg -t ts "website.*location.*displayName" --glob "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/**"
Length of output: 49358
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for implementations that use these new fields in enrichment-related code
echo "Searching for field usage in enrichment implementations..."
rg -t ts "website|location|displayName" -B2 -A2 --glob "services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/**"
# Search for any enrichment source implementations
echo "Searching for enrichment source implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements IEnrichmentSource {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 16111
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (4)
33-42: Logic in isEnrichableBySource method is sound
The isEnrichableBySource method correctly determines if a member is enrichable based on the provided criteria. The checks for display name, location, and verified identifiers are appropriate.
72-72:
Add validation for SERP API key before making the request
The api_key parameter is retrieved from process.env['CROWD_SERP_API_KEY'] without checking if it is defined. If the API key is missing or invalid, the request will fail, and the error handling does not account for this scenario.
Apply this diff to include the validation:
+ const apiKey = process.env['CROWD_SERP_API_KEY']
+ if (!apiKey) {
+ this.log.error('CROWD_SERP_API_KEY is not defined')
+ return null
+ }
const config = {
method: 'get',
url,
params: {
- api_key: process.env['CROWD_SERP_API_KEY'],
+ api_key: apiKey,
q: `"${displayName}" ${location} "${identifier}" site:linkedin.com/in`,
num: 3,
engine: 'google',
},
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
129-129:
Avoid logging sensitive URLs in error messages
Logging the URL in the error message may expose sensitive information. This could be a security concern if the logs are accessible.
Apply this diff to modify the log message:
- this.log.error(`Error while normalizing linkedin url: ${url}`, error)
+ this.log.error('Error while normalizing LinkedIn URL', error)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
19-24:
Fix the undefined alias 'mi' in the SQL query
The SQL condition in enrichableBySql uses the alias mi, but there is no definition or JOIN that introduces mi. This will lead to a SQL error when the query is executed.
Apply this diff to include the necessary JOIN clause or adjust the alias:
public enrichableBySql = `
(members."displayName" like '% %') AND
(members.attributes->'location'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'location'->>'default' <> '') AND
((
members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' <> ''
) OR
- (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'username' and mi.platform = 'github') OR
- (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'email')
+ (memberIdentities.verified AND memberIdentities.type = 'username' and memberIdentities.platform = 'github') OR
+ (memberIdentities.verified AND memberIdentities.type = 'email')
)`Ensure that memberIdentities is properly joined in your SQL query.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| try { | ||
| // const fields = [ | ||
| // 'id', | ||
| // 'displayName', | ||
| // 'location', | ||
| // 'profileUrl', | ||
| // 'website', | ||
| // 'linkedinFromClearbit', | ||
| // 'linkedinFromProgai', | ||
| // 'linkedinFromSerp', | ||
| // ] | ||
| // const json2csvParser = new Parser({ fields }) | ||
| // const csv = json2csvParser.parse(members) | ||
| // writeFileSync('output.csv', csv) | ||
| // console.log('CSV file has been successfully written.') | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| console.error('Error writing CSV file:', err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove or implement CSV export functionality.
The commented-out CSV export code creates confusion. Either implement it properly or remove it. The try-catch block is currently unreachable as noted by static analysis.
If CSV export is needed, consider moving it to a separate utility function:
async function exportToCSV(members: Member[], outputPath: string): Promise<void> {
const fields = ['id', 'displayName', /* ... */];
const parser = new Parser({ fields });
await writeFile(outputPath, parser.parse(members));
}🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 61-63: This code is unreachable
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
| const testSerpApi = async () => { | ||
| const members = [] as any[] | ||
|
|
||
| for (const mem of members) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Convert script to proper test suite.
This appears to be a manual testing script rather than an automated test suite. Consider restructuring using a testing framework like Jest:
-const testSerpApi = async () => {
+describe('SERP API LinkedIn Finder', () => {
+ it('should find LinkedIn profiles for members', async () => {
+ const members: Member[] = [];Would you like me to help create a proper test suite with mocked API responses and test cases?
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const response = (await axios(config)).data | ||
|
|
||
| if (response.search_information.total_results > 0) { | ||
| if ( | ||
| response.organic_results.length > 0 && | ||
| response.organic_results[0].link && | ||
| !response.search_information.spelling_fix && | ||
| !response.search_information.spelling_fix_type | ||
| ) { | ||
| console.log(`Found LinkedIn for ${mem.displayName}: ${response.organic_results[0].link}`) | ||
| console.log(response.search_information) | ||
| mem.linkedinFromSerp = response.organic_results[0].link | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.log(`No LinkedIn found for ${mem.displayName}`) | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| console.log(`No LinkedIn found for ${mem.displayName}`) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| await timeout(1000) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and response validation.
The response handling lacks proper error handling and validation:
- No try-catch around axios call
- No type checking for response structure
- Duplicate console.log for "No LinkedIn found"
- const response = (await axios(config)).data
+ try {
+ const response = await axios(config)
+ const data = validateSerpResponse(response.data)
+
+ if (!data.search_information?.total_results) {
+ logger.info(`No LinkedIn found for ${mem.displayName}`)
+ continue
+ }
+
+ const linkedInProfile = extractLinkedInProfile(data.organic_results)
+ if (linkedInProfile) {
+ logger.info(`Found LinkedIn for ${mem.displayName}: ${linkedInProfile}`)
+ mem.linkedinFromSerp = linkedInProfile
+ } else {
+ logger.info(`No valid LinkedIn profile found for ${mem.displayName}`)
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ logger.error(`Error fetching data for ${mem.displayName}:`, error)
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| console.log(`No LinkedIn found for ${mem.displayName}`) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| await timeout(1000) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing proper rate limiting.
Using a fixed timeout isn't the best approach for rate limiting. Consider implementing a proper rate limiter that respects API limits.
- await timeout(1000)
+ await rateLimiter.wait() // Implement a proper rate limiter classCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| setImmediate(async () => { | ||
| await testSerpApi() | ||
| process.exit(0) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using setImmediate for test execution.
Using setImmediate and process.exit() is not a proper way to run tests. This should be restructured to use a proper test runner.
-setImmediate(async () => {
- await testSerpApi()
- process.exit(0)
-})
+if (require.main === module) {
+ describe('SERP API Tests', () => {
+ // ... test cases
+ });
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| /* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any */ | ||
| import axios from 'axios' | ||
|
|
||
| // import { writeFileSync } from 'fs' | ||
| // import { Parser } from 'json2csv' | ||
| import { timeout } from '@crowd/common' | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider removing eslint-disable directive.
The eslint-disable directive for @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any suggests potential type safety issues. Instead of disabling the rule, consider defining proper interfaces for the member data structure.
-/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any */
+interface Member {
+ displayName: string;
+ location: string;
+ website: string;
+ linkedinFromSerp?: string;
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| api_key: process.env['CROWD_SERP_API_KEY'], | ||
| q: `"${mem.displayName}" ${mem.location} "${mem.website}" site:linkedin.com/in`, | ||
| num: 3, | ||
| engine: 'google', | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Secure API key handling and input validation needed.
Several security and robustness concerns:
- Direct environment variable access without validation
- Potential SQL injection via unescaped member data in query string
- Missing error handling for invalid/missing API key
- api_key: process.env['CROWD_SERP_API_KEY'],
- q: `"${mem.displayName}" ${mem.location} "${mem.website}" site:linkedin.com/in`,
+ api_key: getRequiredEnvVar('CROWD_SERP_API_KEY'),
+ q: `"${escapeSearchString(mem.displayName)}" ${escapeSearchString(mem.location)} "${escapeSearchString(mem.website)}" site:linkedin.com/in`,Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| }, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const response: IMemberEnrichmentSerpApiResponse = (await axios(config)).data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for Axios request to prevent unhandled exceptions
The Axios request in querySerpApi lacks error handling. If the request fails due to network issues or API errors, it could result in unhandled exceptions. It's advisable to wrap the call in a try-catch block to handle errors gracefully and log meaningful messages.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
try {
const response: IMemberEnrichmentSerpApiResponse = (await axios(config)).data
if (response.search_information.total_results > 0) {
// existing logic
}
return null
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.log.error('Error fetching data from SerpAPI', error)
+ return null
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (1)
Line range hint
93-93: Implementation needed for data squasher using LLM.The TODO comment indicates that a critical piece of functionality is missing: the data squasher using LLM and actual member entity enrichment logic. This is important for properly combining enrichment data from multiple sources.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of the data squasher functionality? I can provide a detailed specification including:
- LLM integration requirements
- Data squashing logic
- Member entity enrichment process
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (1)
63-97: Consider implementing rate limiting for SERP API callsThe SERP API likely has rate limits. Consider implementing a rate limiter to prevent hitting API limits and handle rate limit errors gracefully.
Consider using a rate limiting library like
bottleneck:import Bottleneck from 'bottleneck'; private limiter = new Bottleneck({ minTime: 1000, // Minimum time between requests maxConcurrent: 1 // Maximum concurrent requests }); private async querySerpApi(...): Promise<IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp> { return this.limiter.schedule(async () => { // existing query logic }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts(1 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts(2 hunks)services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts(4 hunks)services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/types.ts
🔇 Additional comments (10)
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/workflows/enrichMember.ts (3)
3-8: LGTM! Type changes align with the new enrichable members structure.
The transition from IMember to IEnrichableMember is consistent with the broader changes in the codebase, particularly the renaming of getMembers to getEnrichableMembers.
Also applies to: 33-33
58-60: LGTM! Proper validation for optional properties.
The implementation correctly handles optional properties with undefined fallbacks, addressing the validation concerns raised in the previous review.
23-23: Verify if 20 seconds timeout is sufficient for all enrichment sources.
The timeout increase from 10 to 20 seconds might be related to the addition of new enrichment sources. Please ensure this is sufficient for all sources, including the new SerpApi integration.
services/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/src/sources/serp/service.ts (2)
1-18: LGTM! Clean imports and class setup.
The imports are well-organized, and the class structure properly implements the required interface and logging capabilities.
31-44: LGTM! Solid implementation of enrichment criteria.
The method correctly validates display name format and the presence of required identifiers.
services/libs/data-access-layer/src/old/apps/premium/members_enrichment_worker/index.ts (5)
5-5: LGTM: Type import aligns with enrichment refactoring
The addition of IEnrichableMember type import is consistent with the broader refactoring of member enrichment services.
20-20: LGTM: Return type update
The return type change to Promise<IEnrichableMember[]> aligns with the interface renaming.
37-44:
Critical: SQL Injection vulnerability in enrichableBySql construction
Direct string interpolation of input.enrichableBySql into the query poses a significant security risk.
This issue was previously identified and the suggested fix using parameterized queries is still applicable. Please refer to the previous review comments for the detailed solution.
48-59: Consider optimizing the activitySummary CTE
The CTE performs aggregation across multiple joins which could impact query performance for large datasets. Consider:
- Adding appropriate indexes on
memberSegmentsAgg.memberIdandsegments.parentId - Materializing frequently accessed segment hierarchies
Let's verify the indexes:
64-65: Verify JSON path extraction reliability
The query extracts location and website from nested JSON attributes:
attributes->'location'->>'default' as location,
attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' as websiteEnsure that:
- These JSON paths consistently exist
- NULL handling is appropriate for your use case
✅ Verification successful
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a definitive response about the JSON path extraction reliability:
JSON paths for location and website attributes are reliable and properly handled
The codebase shows that:
- These attributes are well-defined across the system with proper type definitions and validations
- The location and websiteUrl attributes are consistently defined as STRING/URL types in multiple integration modules
- NULL handling is built into the queries with explicit NULL checks:
(members.attributes->'location'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'location'->>'default' <> '') AND
((members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' <> '')🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential NULL or missing JSON paths
ast-grep --pattern 'attributes->$_->$_'
Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQL queries involving the attributes column and JSON operations
rg -l "attributes.*->.*'(location|websiteUrl)'.*->.*'default'"
# Search for table schema or migration files that might define the attributes structure
fd -e sql | xargs rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*members"
# Look for TypeScript type definitions or interfaces related to member attributes
rg -t ts "interface.*Member|type.*Member" -A 5
Length of output: 253754
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SQL schema or migrations defining the members table and attributes structure
rg -l "CREATE TABLE.*members|ALTER TABLE.*members"
# Look for any SQL queries using these JSON paths to understand their usage
rg -A 3 "attributes->.*'(location|websiteUrl)'->>'default'"
# Search for attribute type definitions and validations
rg -t ts "type.*MemberAttribute" -A 2
Length of output: 41999
| public enrichableBySql = ` | ||
| ("activitySummary".total_count > ${this.enrichMembersWithActivityMoreThan}) AND | ||
| (members."displayName" like '% %') AND | ||
| (members.attributes->'location'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'location'->>'default' <> '') AND | ||
| ((members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' <> '') OR | ||
| (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'username' and mi.platform = 'github') OR | ||
| (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'email') | ||
| )` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix undefined SQL alias 'mi'
The SQL condition uses the mi alias without defining it in a JOIN clause. While the multiple-word display name check is intentionally kept based on test results showing better accuracy, the undefined alias needs to be addressed.
Consider adding the necessary JOIN clause:
public enrichableBySql = `
("activitySummary".total_count > ${this.enrichMembersWithActivityMoreThan}) AND
(members."displayName" like '% %') AND
(members.attributes->'location'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'location'->>'default' <> '') AND
((members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' <> '') OR
+ EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM member_identities mi WHERE mi.member_id = members.id AND
(mi.verified AND mi.type = 'username' and mi.platform = 'github') OR
(mi.verified AND mi.type = 'email')
+ )
)`📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public enrichableBySql = ` | |
| ("activitySummary".total_count > ${this.enrichMembersWithActivityMoreThan}) AND | |
| (members."displayName" like '% %') AND | |
| (members.attributes->'location'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'location'->>'default' <> '') AND | |
| ((members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' <> '') OR | |
| (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'username' and mi.platform = 'github') OR | |
| (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'email') | |
| )` | |
| public enrichableBySql = ` | |
| ("activitySummary".total_count > ${this.enrichMembersWithActivityMoreThan}) AND | |
| (members."displayName" like '% %') AND | |
| (members.attributes->'location'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'location'->>'default' <> '') AND | |
| ((members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' is not null and members.attributes->'websiteUrl'->>'default' <> '') OR | |
| EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM member_identities mi WHERE mi.member_id = members.id AND | |
| (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'username' and mi.platform = 'github') OR | |
| (mi.verified AND mi.type = 'email') | |
| ) | |
| )` |
| normalize(data: IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized { | ||
| const normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized = { | ||
| identities: [ | ||
| { | ||
| platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN, | ||
| type: MemberIdentityType.USERNAME, | ||
| verified: false, | ||
| value: this.normalizeLinkedUrl(data.linkedinUrl), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
| return normalized | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling in normalize method
The normalize method doesn't handle potential errors from normalizeLinkedUrl. If URL normalization fails, it will throw an error and potentially break the enrichment process.
Add error handling:
normalize(data: IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized {
+ let normalizedUrl: string;
+ try {
+ normalizedUrl = this.normalizeLinkedUrl(data.linkedinUrl);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.log.warn('Failed to normalize LinkedIn URL, using original', { url: data.linkedinUrl });
+ normalizedUrl = data.linkedinUrl;
+ }
const normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized = {
identities: [
{
platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN,
type: MemberIdentityType.USERNAME,
verified: false,
- value: this.normalizeLinkedUrl(data.linkedinUrl),
+ value: normalizedUrl,
},
],
}
return normalized
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| normalize(data: IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized { | |
| const normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized = { | |
| identities: [ | |
| { | |
| platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN, | |
| type: MemberIdentityType.USERNAME, | |
| verified: false, | |
| value: this.normalizeLinkedUrl(data.linkedinUrl), | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| return normalized | |
| } | |
| normalize(data: IMemberEnrichmentDataSerp): IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized { | |
| let normalizedUrl: string; | |
| try { | |
| normalizedUrl = this.normalizeLinkedUrl(data.linkedinUrl); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.log.warn('Failed to normalize LinkedIn URL, using original', { url: data.linkedinUrl }); | |
| normalizedUrl = data.linkedinUrl; | |
| } | |
| const normalized: IMemberEnrichmentDataNormalized = { | |
| identities: [ | |
| { | |
| platform: PlatformType.LINKEDIN, | |
| type: MemberIdentityType.USERNAME, | |
| verified: false, | |
| value: normalizedUrl, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| } | |
| return normalized | |
| } |
Changes proposed ✍️
What
copilot:summary
copilot:poem
Why
How
copilot:walkthrough
Checklist ✅
Feature,Improvement, orBug.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
SERP, expanding the data enrichment capabilities.EnrichmentServiceSerpApiclass to enrich member data using the SERP API.displayName,website, andlocation.Bug Fixes
Refactor
IMembertoIEnrichableMember, streamlining the enrichment process.Documentation