Don't merge sample build artifacts #6851

andrewlock · 2025-04-14T13:22:44Z

Summary of changes

Don't bother to "merge" the samples into a single artifact to reduce download size

Reason for change

When we moved the sample build to a separate stage (to avoid re-work and to run the build in parallel) we added a job that would aggregate all the different TFMs into a single artifact. This was for simplicity on the consuming side.

However, the size of this merged sample artifact was huge, such that it takes ~6 minutes to download again in some cases (the arm64 agents are much slower to do the download). In general, only a single TFM is ever used anyway (because we parallelize our tests by TFM too), so this is mostly unnecessarily wasted time.

Implementation details

Remove the merge job in the build_samples stage
Add a "helper" download-samples.yml script to make sure you download the different samples to the correct folder (standalone goes in bin, multi-version goes in publish currently)
Update usages

Test coverage

Ran an "all areas" test here
Ran an "all TFMs" test here

Other details

Removing the merge job also speeds up the build_samples stage which is sometimes a blocker for testing stages, so that's an extra bonus

andrewlock · 2025-04-14T13:57:40Z

.azure-pipelines/ultimate-pipeline.yml

-        artifact: samples
-        path: $(outputDir)
-      retryCountOnTaskFailure: 5
+    - template: steps/download-samples.yml


we don't currently run multi-version tests on windows, so don't need to specify the framework here

andrewlock · 2025-04-14T14:02:16Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6851) - mean (70ms)  : 66, 74
     .   : milestone, 70,
    master - mean (70ms)  : 66, 73
     .   : milestone, 70,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6851) - mean (1,014ms)  : 993, 1034
     .   : milestone, 1014,
    master - mean (1,013ms)  : 984, 1041
     .   : milestone, 1013,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6851) - mean (104ms)  : 102, 106
     .   : milestone, 104,
    master - mean (103ms)  : 101, 105
     .   : milestone, 103,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6851) - mean (702ms)  : 685, 718
     .   : milestone, 702,
    master - mean (695ms)  : 675, 714
     .   : milestone, 695,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6851) - mean (91ms)  : 88, 93
     .   : milestone, 91,
    master - mean (90ms)  : 88, 92
     .   : milestone, 90,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6851) - mean (656ms)  : 632, 679
     .   : milestone, 656,
    master - mean (656ms)  : 633, 678
     .   : milestone, 656,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6851) - mean (190ms)  : 185, 196
     .   : milestone, 190,
    master - mean (189ms)  : 185, 193
     .   : milestone, 189,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6851) - mean (1,110ms)  : 1080, 1140
     .   : milestone, 1110,
    master - mean (1,105ms)  : 1084, 1126
     .   : milestone, 1105,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6851) - mean (268ms)  : 265, 272
     .   : milestone, 268,
    master - mean (268ms)  : 264, 273
     .   : milestone, 268,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6851) - mean (879ms)  : 847, 910
     .   : milestone, 879,
    master - mean (881ms)  : 855, 908
     .   : milestone, 881,

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6851) - mean (261ms)  : 257, 266
     .   : milestone, 261,
    master - mean (261ms)  : 258, 264
     .   : milestone, 261,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6851) - mean (870ms)  : 832, 907
     .   : milestone, 870,
    master - mean (867ms)  : 829, 905
     .   : milestone, 867,

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 · 2025-04-14T14:19:25Z

Datadog Report

All test runs c0802f0 🔗

✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed
❄️ 1 with New Flaky

Test Services

Service Name	Failed	Known Flaky	New Flaky	Passed	Skipped	Total Time	Test Service View
`dd-trace-dotnet`	0	0	4	590146	6227	91h 24m 47.11s	Link
`exploration_tests`	0	0	0	22085	3	14m 45.33s	Link

andrewlock · 2025-04-14T14:27:23Z

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6851 compared to master:

3 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.171
2 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.162
All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	8μs	45.4ns	337ns	0.0153	0.00767	0	5.56 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10.4μs	55.6ns	289ns	0.0248	0.00994	0	5.75 KB
master	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	15.8μs	37.3ns	140ns	1.02	0.297	0.102	6.15 KB
#6851	`StartStopWithChild`	net6.0	7.96μs	85.7ns	853ns	0	0	0	5.57 KB
#6851	`StartStopWithChild`	netcoreapp3.1	10.1μs	126ns	1.26μs	0	0	0	5.74 KB
#6851	`StartStopWithChild`	net472	15.6μs	73.1ns	301ns	1.05	0.3	0.075	6.14 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	481μs	165ns	619ns	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	658μs	267ns	999ns	0	2.7 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	857μs	774ns	3μs	0.428	3.3 KB
#6851	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	495μs	397ns	1.49μs	0	2.7 KB
#6851	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	674μs	782ns	2.82μs	0	2.7 KB
#6851	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	862μs	575ns	2.23μs	0	3.31 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendRequest`	net6.0	130μs	383ns	1.48μs	0.139	14.48 KB
master	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	147μs	336ns	1.3μs	0.222	17.28 KB
master	`SendRequest`	net472	0ns	0ns	0ns	0	0 b
#6851	`SendRequest`	net6.0	130μs	721ns	4.62μs	0	14.48 KB
#6851	`SendRequest`	netcoreapp3.1	150μs	479ns	1.85μs	0	17.28 KB
#6851	`SendRequest`	net472	0.00115ns	0.000577ns	0.00216ns	0	0 b

Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	579μs	2.97μs	14.2μs	0.556	0	0	41.65 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	678μs	3.81μs	25μs	0.345	0	0	41.91 KB
master	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	869μs	4.01μs	15.5μs	8.25	2.6	0.434	53.3 KB
#6851	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net6.0	548μs	2.08μs	8.05μs	0	0	0	41.57 KB
#6851	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	netcoreapp3.1	666μs	3.17μs	15.2μs	0	0	0	41.82 KB
#6851	`WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces`	net472	848μs	4.93μs	44.3μs	7.81	3.91	0	53.47 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.36μs	0.966ns	3.74ns	0.0143	0	1.03 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.82μs	1.39ns	5.4ns	0.0136	0	1.02 KB
master	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.04μs	2.21ns	8.54ns	0.158	0.00102	995 B
#6851	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net6.0	1.37μs	1.36ns	5.1ns	0.0134	0	1.03 KB
#6851	`ExecuteNonQuery`	netcoreapp3.1	1.83μs	1.64ns	5.9ns	0.00915	0	1.02 KB
#6851	`ExecuteNonQuery`	net472	2.04μs	3.74ns	14ns	0.149	0.00993	995 B

Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6851

Benchmark	base/diff	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch‑net6.0	1.143	1,285.93	1,125.07

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.29μs	0.478ns	1.66ns	0.0142	984 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.62μs	0.919ns	3.44ns	0.0131	984 B
master	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.57μs	1.04ns	3.89ns	0.159	1 KB
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.27μs	0.695ns	2.69ns	0.0134	960 B
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.58μs	0.661ns	2.47ns	0.0135	1.03 KB
master	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.63μs	1.58ns	6.11ns	0.168	1.06 KB
#6851	`CallElasticsearch`	net6.0	1.13μs	0.977ns	3.66ns	0.0113	984 B
#6851	`CallElasticsearch`	netcoreapp3.1	1.6μs	1.22ns	4.73ns	0.00806	984 B
#6851	`CallElasticsearch`	net472	2.52μs	1.49ns	5.56ns	0.151	1 KB
#6851	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net6.0	1.35μs	1.14ns	4.43ns	0.0134	960 B
#6851	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.59μs	2ns	7.21ns	0.00804	1.03 KB
#6851	`CallElasticsearchAsync`	net472	2.74μs	2.41ns	9.01ns	0.166	1.06 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.27μs	0.623ns	2.33ns	0.0135	960 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.68μs	0.782ns	2.82ns	0.0125	960 B
master	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.89μs	0.715ns	2.77ns	0.147	923 B
#6851	`ExecuteAsync`	net6.0	1.31μs	0.854ns	3.31ns	0.0133	960 B
#6851	`ExecuteAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	1.72μs	5.91ns	22.9ns	0.00848	960 B
#6851	`ExecuteAsync`	net472	1.84μs	0.576ns	2.23ns	0.138	923 B

Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.43μs	0.878ns	3.16ns	0.0325	0	2.32 KB
master	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.35μs	2.14ns	8.03ns	0.0373	0	2.86 KB
master	`SendAsync`	net472	7.43μs	2.06ns	7.72ns	0.495	0.00372	3.13 KB
#6851	`SendAsync`	net6.0	4.42μs	3.1ns	12ns	0.0224	0	2.32 KB
#6851	`SendAsync`	netcoreapp3.1	5.34μs	8.17ns	31.6ns	0.0266	0	2.86 KB
#6851	`SendAsync`	net472	7.47μs	4.61ns	17.9ns	0.485	0	3.13 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.52μs	1.07ns	4.15ns	0.0241	1.71 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.13μs	0.724ns	2.71ns	0.0228	1.71 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.66μs	1.25ns	4.85ns	0.26	1.64 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	1.55μs	2.28ns	8.53ns	0.0232	1.71 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	2.34μs	4.82ns	18ns	0.0229	1.71 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net472	2.72μs	1.68ns	6.51ns	0.258	1.64 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Gen 1	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	112μs	141ns	546ns	0.0564	0	4.32 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	116μs	245ns	951ns	0.0575	0	4.32 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	150μs	176ns	682ns	0.673	0.224	4.51 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	111μs	148ns	555ns	0	0	4.32 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	118μs	309ns	1.16μs	0	0	4.32 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net472	152μs	367ns	1.42μs	0	0	4.51 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	3μs	1.07ns	4.13ns	0.0315	2.26 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.17μs	1.67ns	6.25ns	0.0292	2.26 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	5.05μs	1.73ns	6.69ns	0.331	2.09 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.86μs	2.39ns	8.93ns	0.0287	2.26 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4.14μs	2.64ns	9.52ns	0.0206	2.26 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.95μs	1.81ns	6.77ns	0.322	2.09 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.42μs	0.803ns	3.11ns	0.0162	1.15 KB
master	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.74μs	1.18ns	4.57ns	0.0157	1.15 KB
master	`SendReceive`	net472	2.09μs	0.841ns	3.26ns	0.184	1.16 KB
#6851	`SendReceive`	net6.0	1.39μs	0.956ns	3.7ns	0.0138	1.15 KB
#6851	`SendReceive`	netcoreapp3.1	1.85μs	1.75ns	6.56ns	0.00921	1.15 KB
#6851	`SendReceive`	net472	2.13μs	1.19ns	4.6ns	0.181	1.16 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.8μs	1.23ns	4.78ns	0.0238	1.64 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	4μs	1.99ns	7.72ns	0.022	1.69 KB
master	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.51μs	2.02ns	7.81ns	0.33	2.08 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net6.0	2.78μs	2.04ns	7.9ns	0.0138	1.64 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	netcoreapp3.1	3.73μs	1.71ns	6.17ns	0.0188	1.69 KB
#6851	`EnrichedLog`	net472	4.47μs	4.64ns	18ns	0.314	2.08 KB

Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6851

Benchmark	diff/base	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑netcoreapp3.1	1.186	678.16	804.24

Faster 🎉 in #6851

Benchmark	base/diff	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1	1.205	671.97	557.77

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	399ns	0.141ns	0.544ns	0.00819	584 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	671ns	0.347ns	1.34ns	0.00777	584 B
master	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	629ns	0.252ns	0.976ns	0.0929	586 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	489ns	0.175ns	0.679ns	0.00998	704 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	678ns	0.224ns	0.869ns	0.00949	704 B
master	`StartFinishScope`	net472	907ns	0.155ns	0.579ns	0.106	666 B
#6851	`StartFinishSpan`	net6.0	402ns	0.226ns	0.847ns	0.00823	584 B
#6851	`StartFinishSpan`	netcoreapp3.1	558ns	0.539ns	2.09ns	0.00559	584 B
#6851	`StartFinishSpan`	net472	648ns	0.114ns	0.41ns	0.0909	586 B
#6851	`StartFinishScope`	net6.0	488ns	0.42ns	1.63ns	0.00969	704 B
#6851	`StartFinishScope`	netcoreapp3.1	804ns	0.793ns	2.97ns	0.00807	704 B
#6851	`StartFinishScope`	net472	863ns	0.309ns	1.07ns	0.104	666 B

Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6851

Benchmark	diff/base	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑netcoreapp3.1	1.138	898.11	1,022.49

Faster 🎉 in #6851

Benchmark	base/diff	Base Median (ns)	Diff Median (ns)	Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0	1.165	763.95	655.54

Raw results

Branch	Method	Toolchain	Mean	StdError	StdDev	Gen 0	Allocated
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	764ns	0.329ns	1.27ns	0.00993	704 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	898ns	0.456ns	1.64ns	0.00951	704 B
master	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.08μs	0.359ns	1.39ns	0.106	666 B
#6851	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net6.0	656ns	0.426ns	1.65ns	0.00986	704 B
#6851	`RunOnMethodBegin`	netcoreapp3.1	1.02μs	1.25ns	4.84ns	0.00507	704 B
#6851	`RunOnMethodBegin`	net472	1.09μs	1.05ns	4.06ns	0.104	666 B

datadog-ddstaging · 2025-04-14T18:57:18Z

Datadog Report

Branch report: andrew/split-sample-upload
Commit report: c0802f0
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 8 Passed, 0 Skipped, 0s Total Time

NachoEchevarria

Nice! Thanks!

andrewlock added 3 commits April 14, 2025 11:41

Try splitting the sample upload/download

637a68a

Remove merge

c7a4c87

Extract a template for it

c0802f0

andrewlock added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Apr 14, 2025

andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner April 14, 2025 13:22

andrewlock changed the title ~~Split sample upload~~ Don't merge sample build artifacts Apr 14, 2025

andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2025

View reviewed changes

NachoEchevarria approved these changes Apr 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

bouwkast approved these changes Apr 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

andrewlock merged commit 5129dc8 into master Apr 15, 2025
133 of 136 checks passed

andrewlock deleted the andrew/split-sample-upload branch April 15, 2025 13:21

github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Apr 15, 2025

Don't merge sample build artifacts #6851

Don't merge sample build artifacts #6851

Uh oh!

Conversation

andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2025

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Uh oh!

andrewlock Apr 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2025

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Apr 14, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Datadog Report

Uh oh!

andrewlock commented Apr 14, 2025

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmark details

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Faster 🎉 in #6851

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6851

Faster 🎉 in #6851

Raw results

Slower ⚠️ in #6851

Faster 🎉 in #6851

Raw results

Uh oh!

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Apr 14, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Datadog Report

Uh oh!

NachoEchevarria left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Apr 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Apr 14, 2025 •

edited

Loading