-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 347
Improve MSRV check and fix aria-label
in MSRV badge
#2003
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6cbc916
Idea for expanded and clarified `ci-check-msrv` recipe doc
EliahKagan af70bfa
Rewrite expanded `ci-check-msrv` doc so `just --list` works
EliahKagan 510847b
Ensure the Windows `check-msrv` job uses the intended toolchain
EliahKagan 4af6ef9
Make the `check-msrv` jobs more robust and documented
EliahKagan f10f18d
Use `--locked` instead of checking `Cargo.lock` afterwards
EliahKagan eaecc9b
Further split `check-msrv` steps; let Windows use `pwsh` again
EliahKagan dc1d271
doc: Fix accessibility bug in MSRV badge
EliahKagan 3a63c68
Actually build `gix` to check MSRV
EliahKagan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know why we have a
check-msrv-on-ci
rule in theMakefile
, equivalent to theci-check-msrv
recipe in thejustfile
that themsrv.yml
workflow uses. I've expanded the comment only in thejustfile
. But I've updated the command in theMakefile
, rather than only in thejustfile
, so that their behavior can remain equivalent as long as we keep duplicating functionality across both.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for bringing this up. It also seems like this target isn't used at all, so I think it's better to remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I'll remove it from
Makefile
in a subsequent PR.More broadly, I'm not clear on what is supposed to go in the
Makefile
and what is supposed to go in thejustfile
. Is theMakefile
just left over from before thejustfile
was introduced, such that everything there is there is for historical reasons only? Should its contents be migtated to thejustfile
? Or are there reason to prefer that some things be in theMakefile
instead of thejustfile
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a left-over, and the port to
justfile
was never completed.make stress
is still called, and it could be that it leverages the natural parallelism ofmake
which is harder to do in ajustfile
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I see. I'll remember to consider the effect on parallelism if and when moving things, especially if they are not already duplicated, from the
Makefile
to thejustfile
. Thecheck-msrv-on-ci
rule/target probably doesn't benefit from that, though.