Skip to content

feat(dynamo-run): Basic routing choice #524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

grahamking
Copy link
Contributor

As a first step towards KV routing:

  • introduce a --router-mode in dynamo-run that only does random and round-robin right now. Not that interesting yet.
  • Make the vllm engine publish the KV events received from our patched vllm.

Now we "just" need to connect the two. Easy right?

As a first step towards KV routing:
- introduce a `--router-mode` in dynamo-run that only does random and
round-robin right now. Not that interesting yet.
- Make the vllm engine publish the KV events received from our
patched vllm.

Now we "just" need to connect the two. Easy right?
Copy link
Contributor

@rmccorm4 rmccorm4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

random/round-robin router inclusion changes LGTM.

I'm curious to see how we can get to a consistent story across dynamo run and dynamo serve/deploy for KV Routing, as well as consistent naming/schemes for discovery for things like metrics/grafana/observability.

@grahamking grahamking merged commit 7b70262 into main Apr 7, 2025
12 checks passed
@grahamking grahamking deleted the gk-basic-routing branch April 7, 2025 22:25
kylehh pushed a commit to kylehh/dynamo that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
As a first step towards KV routing:
- introduce a `--router-mode` in dynamo-run that only does random and round-robin right now. Not that interesting yet.
- Make the vllm engine publish the KV events received from our patched vllm.

Now we "just" need to connect the two. Easy right?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants