-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
feat(material-experimental): add test harness for radio-group #16609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
andrewseguin
merged 2 commits into
angular:master
from
devversion:feat/experimental-radio-group-harness
Aug 21, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It kind of feels like
id
andname
should just be things you can do with normal selectors and shouldn't need a special filter option, e.g.There is a problem with this currently though, which is that
getHarness
searches for the harness on an element under the root of the loader. So ifmy-id
is the id of your radio group, it won't check that element, just the ones under it. MaybegetHarness
should check the given element and anything under it? That would eliminate the need for these filters I thinkUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this case it is a bit more special though because the
name
orid
is not necessarily set on theradio-group
orradio-button
element, but rather on the underlying input.So if someone queries a radio-group by name, we check if it has a DOM attribute or find the right group by respecting the
name
attribute for child radio-buttons in groups.Another pain point here is that if someone sets the radio-group name through an input binding, the
name
attribute will not be set. There is no host-binding for that. That's why we need to respect the inputs of child radio-button's.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see that's a good point, I wonder if I should add similar ones for checkbox. It will probably have the same issue if people want to search by name...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I will double-check on that and make a note.