Skip to content

refactor(material/list): fix action list CSS styles conflict with MDC-based list #20477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

devversion
Copy link
Member

@devversion devversion commented Sep 2, 2020

The Angular Material action list has been styled using an element selector,
instead of using the corresponding CSS class. This meant that the MDC-based
list seemed to have a working action list, but in reality it was just working due
to the leaked styles from the non-MDC list.

This fixes the selector in the Angular Material list, and adds the necessary styles
for the action list to the MDC list styles.

Note: I used the refactor type as I wasn't sure whether we want this to show up for the non-MDC list in the changelog.

@devversion devversion added P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Sep 2, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Sep 2, 2020
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crisbeto crisbeto added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Sep 2, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@mmalerba mmalerba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@devversion devversion added P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround and removed P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent labels Apr 28, 2021
…-based list

The Angular Material action list has been styled using an element selector,
instead of using the corresponding CSS class. This meant that the MDC-based
list seemed to have a working action list, but in reality it was just working due
to the leaked styles from the non-MDC list.

This fixes the selector in the Angular Material list, and adds the necessary styles
for the action list to the MDC list styles.
@devversion devversion force-pushed the fix/mdc-list-button-reset-action-list branch from 7297fde to 6fd5034 Compare July 6, 2021 13:27
@andrewseguin andrewseguin removed the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Dec 28, 2021
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Dec 29, 2021
@devversion
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #24186 which is more recent and likely to be merged 😄

@devversion devversion closed this Jan 11, 2022
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 11, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants