docs(material/form-field): update documentation about the form-field appearances #22817
Conversation
mmalerba
added
merge safe
target: patch
google-cla
bot
added
the
cla: yes
| compared with both the label and input text. | ||
|
|
||
| The second important difference is that the `standard`, `fill`, and `outline` appearances do not | ||
| input. The `legacy` and `standard` appearances implement an older version of the spec where |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: The order seems off as someone learning about the appearances. It seems odd to start with the two appearances that don't match the spec. I'd expect these to be mentioned near the bottom in a section about accepted but not supported appearances.
Then again, we default to legacy so shrug. Would be cool to change the default (and probably transform the code into Google to keep supporting legacy as default)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah that makes sense, I just left it in the order I found it, but it would probably be good to switch it
mmalerba
force-pushed
the
ff-appearance-docs
branch
from
b98138b to
0703fda
Compare
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
fixes #20663