Skip to content

refactor(tabs-demo): replace active link index #4729

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ambaumann
Copy link
Contributor

replace active link index with active router link isActive property

Motivation is to remove the current comment "can be removed if routerLink exposes if it is active". Current router link implementation does allow the itActive flag.

…k isActive property

Motivation is to remove the current comment "can be removed if routerLink exposes if it is active". Current router link implementation does allow the itActive flag.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label May 22, 2017
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels May 23, 2017
@tinayuangao tinayuangao merged commit ae46810 into angular:master May 23, 2017
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants