Clarify the docs for partitioned(by:)
#228
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci please test |
mdznr
reviewed
Apr 25, 2024
mdznr
reviewed
Apr 25, 2024
|
@swift-ci please test |
mdznr
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2024
LucianoPAlmeida
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2024
natecook1000
reviewed
May 7, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One quick note (that applies to both changes), then we should be good to merge! Thanks, @j-f1!
|
@swift-ci please test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As currently written, the summary for
partitioned(by:)heavily implies the return value is(trueValues, falseValues). In fact, it’s the opposite. I rephrased this summary to clarify that (1) the order is(falseValues, trueValues)and (2) the elements of the two returned arrays are in the order they were in the original sequence/collection.Checklist