-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Add compatibility to Portenta H7 #44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Memory usage change @ f89b416
Click for full report table
Click for full report CSV
|
I don't know why the CI keeps failing but if I compile locally it's ok... 🤔 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add mbed_portenta
and mbed
to the architectures
field of library.properties
.
Are you referring to this failure @facchinm?
|
I apologize for the confusion @facchinm. This is the result of my poor design of the log output from the
So this failure was from when the action checked out the base ref of this PR ( You can see here that the compilation from when the head ref of this PR ( The compilations of the base ref are done solely for data collection purposes. Their result does not affect the status of the CI, but only the informational size deltas report comment. The only reason the Portenta H7 compilation job failed was the error that occurred during the "Flasher" example compilation. If that error was resolved or the CI workflow reconfigured to skip that example, the job would pass ✔️ |
Ahhhnn got it 😄 (you probably told me 1000 times but I still end up forgetting this information 😝 ) |
No description provided.