Skip to content

Remove obsolete workaround for ESP8266 in compilation test CI workflow #38

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2020

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented May 28, 2020

The ESP8266 platform has a tool dependency on python3, but assumes that tool is already installed in a particular location on Linux. At the time this workaround was added, the Docker container used by the arduino/actions/libraries/compile-examples action did not provide this tool, so a workaround was needed to install it in the container.

Since that time, the action has developed a dependency on Python, making this workaround unnecessary. The switch from the action being a Bash script to a Python script caused the now-unnecessary workaround to break the workflow.

The ESP8266 platform has a tool dependency on python3, but assumes that tool is already installed in a particular location on Linux. At the time this workaround was added, the Docker container used by the arduino/actions/libraries/compile-examples action did not provide this tool, so a workaround was needed to install it in the container. Since that time, the action has developed a dependency on Python, making this workaround unnecessary. The switch from the action being a Bash script to a Python script caused the now-unnecessary workaround to break the workflow.
Copy link
Contributor

@aentinger aentinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @per1234 👋

@aentinger aentinger merged commit 6f4b6f0 into arduino-libraries:master May 29, 2020
@per1234 per1234 deleted the fix-ci branch May 29, 2020 04:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants