-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
Newsletter 357 german #2358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Newsletter 357 german #2358
Conversation
@@ -171,4 +171,4 @@ für weitere Informationen zu Payjoin v2. | |||
[multiprocess project]: https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/blob/pr/ipc/doc/design/multiprocess.md | |||
[news320 ipc]: /en/newsletters/2024/09/13/#bitcoin-core-30509 | |||
[news264 payjoin]: /en/newsletters/2023/08/16/#serverless-payjoin | |||
[news353 pr review]: /de/newsletters/2025/05/09/#bitcoin-core-pr-review-club |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should have worked, what problem did you see?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed out of band, the source of the issue was identified as this feature branch having branched off from master before the German newsletter 353 had been merged which is why the link 404'd in the preview.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, the build process failed because you are linking to a missing file. Our build pipeline is much more observant than I expected. 😁
I think the easiest fix would then be to merge upstream/master into this pull request.
Please let me know when you think this is ready for merge by changing the pull request from Draft to Ready for Review.
150cd4d
to
d9bcb1a
Compare
Irgendwie ist in diesem Force-push die Änderung von "Sicherheitserwägungen" zu "Sicherheitsabwägungen" zurückgenommen worden und es wird wieder auf den englischen Newsletter verlinkt. Was ich vorschlagen wollte ist:
Danach sollte der Link zum deutschen Newsletter funktionieren (da der Newsletter jetzt im gleichen Branch existiert). Die Änderung zu "Sicherheitsabwägungen" würde ich auch wieder einfügen. Wenn wir dann dieses Pull Request in den @Walpurga03: Magst du das machen oder soll ich es machen? |
No description provided.