[class.conv.general] p4 seems redundant

[cor3ntin]

[class.conv.general] p4 says

At most one user-defined conversion (constructor or conversion function) is implicitly applied to a single value.

However this does not explain anything, the actually specification leading to this restriction is described in
[over.best.ics.general]

We can leave the sentence but we should probably make it a note

Proposed resolution

Make [class.conv.general] p4 a note

[Note: At most one user-defined conversion (constructor or conversion function) is implicitly applied to a single value. — end note]

[JohelEGP]

Looks like this could be an editorial issue (https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/wiki/How-to-submit-an-editorial-issue).