Should we always show the library in search dropdown?

[Hixie]

If I search for [SizedBox] I get:

The first three make sense to me as presented.

The constructors (4-8) are a bit weird. They say "SizedBox.constructorName constructor (in SizedBox)", which is true, but seems redundant. We know that the SizedBox.constructorName constructor is in SizedBox, by virtue of its name. What we don't know, and might be useful, is which library it's from.

This is relevant for example when searching for [Element]:

There are two Elements, as shown in the list, one in dart:html and one in widgets. There's one constructor listed. Which is it? Is it a dart:html constructor that creates an element with the given width, or a widgets constructor that creates and element with the given widget?

If we changed the parenthetical here to be the library, it would be clearer.

If we do this, we should probably also changes properties and methods to be fully qualified names (e.g. SizedBox.width (in widgets) rather than width (in SizedBox) or width (in widgets)).

[Levi-Lesches]

👍 for always showing qualified names! Seeing SizedBox.width is so much more helpful than just widget property and then checking the parentheticals.