-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
ci: Optimize CI processes #2451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Could you don't remove the |
But I can not trigger it on that place. I wanna simply test it here with multi manually runs to check the behavior (the PRs behavior, the branch) before we merge it. e.g. |
You need to fork and test in your own repo, add a push event, remove the Please test in your own repo since testing that will initiate an invalid PR. |
I see the
I think raise an invalid PR is fine to me since we won't merge it. |
Hi @sy-records , Plz take a look on https://github.com/docsifyjs/docsify/actions/runs/9447704932/job/26020091254 . (It's not in a fork) |
good catch, The default token does not have |
On the test here https://github.com/docsifyjs/docsify/actions/runs/9448830558/job/26023692530
If we could have a change to always review/deal with the latest changes PR on the review day, it would be better. |
There is no need for multiple branches and multiple PRs. |
I thought the behavior same to you mentioned that the opened PR should up to date, but the action is failed tho. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
close #2452
close #2453