Skip to content

Comment usb_serial_jtag_ll_txfifo_flush() #9406

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Jason2866
Copy link
Collaborator

@Jason2866 Jason2866 commented Mar 22, 2024

Patch PR #9401 with the change from #9378 (comment)

@SuGlider

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "Comment usb_serial_jtag_ll_txfifo_flush() -> https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/issues/9378#issuecomment-2013740414":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 20 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

⚠️
	The **target branch** for this Pull Request **must be the default branch** of the project (`master`).

	If you would like to add this feature to a different branch, please state this in the PR description and we will consider it.

👋 Hello Jason2866, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bada92b

@SuGlider SuGlider self-requested a review March 22, 2024 19:54
@SuGlider SuGlider self-assigned this Mar 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@SuGlider SuGlider left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It fails with the test case that I have provided in the PR.
S3 and C3 are hanging after about 50 transmissions.

@Jason2866
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing since does introduce new issues.

@Jason2866 Jason2866 closed this Mar 23, 2024
@Jason2866 Jason2866 deleted the patch-4 branch April 20, 2024 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants