Closed
Description
Description
Lint rules complain about this:
outer:
for (const row of rows) {
for (const elt of row) {
if (elt === 0)
break outer;
// compute on elt
}
}which is the most succinct way to stop processing the current row and all following rows, once a zero is encountered anywhere.
They complain in two ways, first no-restricted-syntax complains about any label of any kind. Then no-labels complains twice, first about the label again, and second about the break statement with a label.
Expected behavior
No complaints. I'd probably be ok with a complaint about this:
label: {
var a = f();
if (something())
break label;
//etc
}as that's weird (but apparently legal). However labels are needed on looping constructs for exactly the purpose outlined here.
Actual behavior
Three lint complaints.