Skip to content

Michaelrfairhurst/compatible types performance fix alt #891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 10 additions & 2 deletions c/cert/src/rules/DCL40-C/IncompatibleFunctionDeclarations.ql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ import codingstandards.c.cert
import codingstandards.cpp.types.Compatible
import ExternalIdentifiers

predicate interestedInFunctions(FunctionDeclarationEntry f1, FunctionDeclarationEntry f2) {
not f1 = f2 and
f1.getDeclaration() = f2.getDeclaration() and
f1.getName() = f2.getName()
}

from ExternalIdentifiers d, FunctionDeclarationEntry f1, FunctionDeclarationEntry f2
where
not isExcluded(f1, Declarations2Package::incompatibleFunctionDeclarationsQuery()) and
Expand All @@ -29,10 +35,12 @@ where
f1.getName() = f2.getName() and
(
//return type check
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig>::equalReturnTypes(f1, f2)
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, interestedInFunctions/2>::equalReturnTypes(f1,
f2)
or
//parameter type check
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig>::equalParameterTypes(f1, f2)
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, interestedInFunctions/2>::equalParameterTypes(f1,
f2)
) and
// Apply ordering on start line, trying to avoid the optimiser applying this join too early
// in the pipeline
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,18 +20,14 @@ import codingstandards.cpp.types.LvalueConversion
import codingstandards.cpp.types.SimpleAssignment

predicate typesCompatible(Type t1, Type t2) {
TypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, TypeFromGeneric>::equalTypes(t1, t2)
TypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, relevantTypes/2>::equalTypes(t1, t2)
}

class TypeFromGeneric extends Type {
TypeFromGeneric() {
exists(C11GenericExpr g |
(
this = g.getAssociationType(_) or
this = g.getControllingExpr().getFullyConverted().getType()
)
)
}
predicate relevantTypes(Type a, Type b) {
exists(C11GenericExpr g |
a = g.getAnAssociationType() and
b = getLvalueConverted(g.getControllingExpr().getFullyConverted().getType())
)
}

predicate missesOnPointerConversion(Type provided, Type expected) {
Expand All @@ -40,11 +36,11 @@ predicate missesOnPointerConversion(Type provided, Type expected) {
// But 6.5.16.1 simple assignment constraints would have been satisfied:
(
// Check as if the controlling expr is assigned to the expected type:
SimpleAssignment<TypeFromGeneric>::satisfiesSimplePointerAssignment(expected, provided)
SimpleAssignment<relevantTypes/2>::satisfiesSimplePointerAssignment(expected, provided)
or
// Since developers typically rely on the compiler to catch const/non-const assignment
// errors, don't assume a const-to-non-const generic selection miss was intentional.
SimpleAssignment<TypeFromGeneric>::satisfiesSimplePointerAssignment(provided, expected)
SimpleAssignment<relevantTypes/2>::satisfiesSimplePointerAssignment(provided, expected)
)
}

Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ import cpp
import codingstandards.c.misra
import codingstandards.cpp.types.Compatible

predicate interestedInFunctions(FunctionDeclarationEntry f1, FunctionDeclarationEntry f2) {
f1.getDeclaration() = f2.getDeclaration() and
not f1 = f2 and
f1.getDeclaration() = f2.getDeclaration()
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Redundant condition.

}

from FunctionDeclarationEntry f1, FunctionDeclarationEntry f2, string case, string pluralDo
where
not isExcluded(f1, Declarations4Package::declarationsOfAFunctionSameNameAndTypeQuery()) and
Expand All @@ -24,12 +30,12 @@ where
f1.getDeclaration() = f2.getDeclaration() and
//return type check
(
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypeNamesMatchConfig>::equalReturnTypes(f1, f2) and
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypeNamesMatchConfig, interestedInFunctions/2>::equalReturnTypes(f1, f2) and
case = "return type" and
pluralDo = "does"
or
//parameter type check
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypeNamesMatchConfig>::equalParameterTypes(f1, f2) and
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypeNamesMatchConfig, interestedInFunctions/2>::equalParameterTypes(f1, f2) and
case = "parameter types" and
pluralDo = "do"
or
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -16,15 +16,6 @@ import cpp
import codingstandards.c.misra
import codingstandards.cpp.types.Compatible

class RelevantType extends Type {
RelevantType() {
exists(VariableDeclarationEntry decl |
(relevantPair(decl, _) or relevantPair(_, decl)) and
decl.getType() = this
)
}
}

predicate relevantPair(VariableDeclarationEntry decl1, VariableDeclarationEntry decl2) {
not decl1 = decl2 and
not decl1.getVariable().getDeclaringType().isAnonymous() and
Expand All @@ -43,12 +34,20 @@ predicate relevantPair(VariableDeclarationEntry decl1, VariableDeclarationEntry
)
}

predicate relevantTypes(Type a, Type b) {
exists(VariableDeclarationEntry varA, VariableDeclarationEntry varB |
a = varA.getType() and
b = varB.getType() and
relevantPair(varA, varB)
)
}

from VariableDeclarationEntry decl1, VariableDeclarationEntry decl2
where
not isExcluded(decl1, Declarations4Package::declarationsOfAnObjectSameNameAndTypeQuery()) and
not isExcluded(decl2, Declarations4Package::declarationsOfAnObjectSameNameAndTypeQuery()) and
relevantPair(decl1, decl2) and
not TypeEquivalence<TypeNamesMatchConfig, RelevantType>::equalTypes(decl1.getType(),
not TypeEquivalence<TypeNamesMatchConfig, relevantTypes/2>::equalTypes(decl1.getType(),
decl2.getType())
select decl1,
"The object $@ of type " + decl1.getType().toString() +
Expand Down
16 changes: 14 additions & 2 deletions c/misra/src/rules/RULE-8-4/CompatibleDeclarationFunctionDefined.ql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,6 +19,16 @@ import codingstandards.c.misra
import codingstandards.cpp.Identifiers
import codingstandards.cpp.types.Compatible

predicate interestedInFunctions(FunctionDeclarationEntry f1, FunctionDeclarationEntry f2) {
f1.getDeclaration() instanceof ExternalIdentifiers and
f1.isDefinition() and
f1.getName() = f2.getName() and
f1.getDeclaration() = f2.getDeclaration() and
not f2.isDefinition() and
not f1.isFromTemplateInstantiation(_) and
not f2.isFromTemplateInstantiation(_)
}

from FunctionDeclarationEntry f1
where
not isExcluded(f1, Declarations4Package::compatibleDeclarationFunctionDefinedQuery()) and
Expand All @@ -38,10 +48,12 @@ where
f2.getDeclaration() = f1.getDeclaration() and
(
//return types differ
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig>::equalReturnTypes(f1, f2)
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, interestedInFunctions/2>::equalReturnTypes(f1,
f2)
or
//parameter types differ
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig>::equalParameterTypes(f1, f2)
not FunctionDeclarationTypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, interestedInFunctions/2>::equalParameterTypes(f1,
f2)
or
//parameter names differ
parameterNamesUnmatched(f1, f2)
Expand Down
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions c/misra/src/rules/RULE-8-4/CompatibleDeclarationObjectDefined.ql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ import codingstandards.c.misra
import codingstandards.cpp.Identifiers
import codingstandards.cpp.types.Compatible

class RelevantType extends Type {
RelevantType() {
exists(VariableDeclarationEntry decl |
count(VariableDeclarationEntry others | others.getDeclaration() = decl.getDeclaration()) > 1 and
decl.getType() = this
)
}
predicate relevantTypes(Type a, Type b) {
exists(VariableDeclarationEntry varA, VariableDeclarationEntry varB |
not varA = varB and
varA.getDeclaration() = varB.getDeclaration() and
a = varA.getType() and
b = varB.getType()
)
}

from VariableDeclarationEntry decl1
Expand All @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ where
not exists(VariableDeclarationEntry decl2 |
not decl2.isDefinition() and
decl1.getDeclaration() = decl2.getDeclaration() and
TypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, RelevantType>::equalTypes(decl1.getType(),
TypeEquivalence<TypesCompatibleConfig, relevantTypes/2>::equalTypes(decl1.getType(),
decl2.getType())
)
select decl1, "No separate compatible declaration found for this definition."
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
- `RULE-8-3`, `RULE-8-4`, `DCL40-C`, `RULE-23-5`: `DeclarationsOfAFunctionSameNameAndType.ql`, `DeclarationsOfAnObjectSameNameAndType.ql`, `CompatibleDeclarationOfFunctionDefined.ql`, `CompatibleDeclarationObjectDefined.ql`, `IncompatibleFunctionDeclarations.ql`, `DangerousDefaultSelectionForPointerInGeneric.ql`:
- Added pragmas to alter join order on function parameter equivalence (names and types).
- Refactored expression which the optimizer was confused by, and compiled into a cartesian product.
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Apr 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider rewording this line for clarity. For instance, specify that the expression was refactored to prevent the optimizer from generating an unintended cartesian product.

Suggested change
- Refactored expression which the optimizer was confused by, and compiled into a cartesian product.
- Refactored an expression to prevent the optimizer from generating an unintended cartesian product, which could lead to performance issues. The refactoring ensures that the join order is explicitly defined, avoiding ambiguity in the optimizer's behavior.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

- Altered the module `Compatible.qll` to only perform expensive equality checks on types that are compared to a non identical other type, and those reachable from those types in the type graph. Types that are identical will trivially be considered equivalent.
- `RULE-23-5`: `DangerousDefaultSelectionForPointerInGeneric.ql`:
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Apr 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The RULE-23-5 changes are mentioned both in the consolidated bullet and separately. It would improve clarity to consolidate or better distinguish the separate concerns if intentional.

Suggested change
- `RULE-23-5`: `DangerousDefaultSelectionForPointerInGeneric.ql`:

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

- Altered the module `SimpleAssignment.qll` in accordance with the changes to `Compatible.qll`.
Loading
Loading