-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
JS: Refactor the XSS / Client-side-url queries #8304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d9d383
remove unused import
erik-krogh 559f03e
remove unnecessary module qualifier
erik-krogh fc79242
add tests
erik-krogh 67e6a4c
add a `isXSSSink` predicate to the client-side-url-redirection sinks
erik-krogh 2576e1f
add utility predicate to get client-side remote-flow-sources that con…
erik-krogh b471fec
split `interpretsArgumentsAsURL` out of `interpretsArgumentsAsHTML`, …
erik-krogh 87842bb
add client-side-url sinks that may execute JavaScript as XSS sinks
erik-krogh f083e87
refactor the `js/xss` query to use three flowlabels and one configura…
erik-krogh 562dce5
rename `isXSSSink` to `isXssSink`
erik-krogh b3de5d9
move `PrefixStringSanitizer` to the Query.qll file, and have it exten…
erik-krogh d8a5947
simplify TaintedUrlSuffix::source() to only consider window.location …
erik-krogh 6cdc387
update expected output
erik-krogh aa8b7c8
update reference to deprecated class name
erik-krogh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
join
calls are also modelled as string concatenations. Is the above case not enough?Ideally
[taint, "constant"].join()
would remain prefix-tainted.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes join calls are modeled as string concats, but only when
join
is called with the empty string.So e.g.
[taint, "constant"].join("/")
is not modeled as a string concatenation.So no, the above case is not enough.