Skip to content

Vendor Update #14496

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jan 28, 2021
Merged

Vendor Update #14496

merged 15 commits into from
Jan 28, 2021

Conversation

6543
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 commented Jan 27, 2021

  • github.com/yuin/goldmark v1.2.1 -> v1.3.1
  • github.com/xanzy/go-gitlab v0.39.0 -> v0.42.0
  • github.com/pquerna/otp v1.2.0 -> v1.3.0
  • github.com/olivere/elastic/v7 v7.0.21 -> v7.0.22
  • github.com/niklasfasching/go-org v1.3.2 -> v1.4.0
  • github.com/minio/minio-go/v7 v7.0.6 -> v7.0.7
  • github.com/mgechev/revive 246eac737dc7 -> v1.0.3
  • github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 v1.14.4 -> v1.14.6
  • github.com/markbates/goth v1.65.0 -> v1.66.1
  • github.com/lib/pq 083382b7e6fc -> v1.9.0
  • github.com/klauspost/compress v1.11.3 -> v1.11.7
  • github.com/google/uuid v1.1.2 -> v1.2.0
  • github.com/go-swagger/go-swagger v0.25.0 -> v0.26.0
  • code.gitea.io/sdk/gitea v0.13.1 -> v0.13.2

@6543 6543 added this to the 1.14.0 milestone Jan 27, 2021
@6543 6543 added type/bug type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality backport/v1.13 labels Jan 27, 2021
@techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

I don't think we should backport all of these, I think only backporting the vendor libraries that fix the bug.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jan 27, 2021
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 27, 2021

@techknowlogick I know ... I'm already on it ... just give me some time

@6543 6543 added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Jan 27, 2021
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 27, 2021

@techknowlogick -> #14497

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jan 28, 2021
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jan 28, 2021
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 28, 2021

Did we need to back port all of the vendors if we even don't know it will fix or result in bugs?

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Jan 28, 2021

no we dont ... already done - was mainly the sdk ...

@6543 6543 merged commit d1353e1 into go-gitea:master Jan 28, 2021
@6543 6543 deleted the vendor-update branch January 28, 2021 16:56
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants