-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 347
Going forward defun should go to end of defun #1335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I wrote some tests and fixed some bugs. I refactored out this out to |
@gracjan Done. These should be squashed since they are fixup commits. |
Instead of hardcoded position I would prefer checks based on Can you also squash and force-push to this pr? Thanks. |
That's smart will do tomorrow |
I put you as the copyright holder for this code. Is this required for contribution or should I put myself down? |
Copyright: Haskell mode Contributors |
Fixed build error if |
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ | |||
;;; haskell-decl-scan-tests.el -*- lexical-binding t -*- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a colon between lexical-binding
and t
.
Did that. What does that do? |
Read it on Wikipedia nvm |
In other emacs modes,
C-M-e
will go just past the end of the current function rather than to the beginning of the next function. Here is a patch that makes this work correctly forhaskell-decl-scan-mode
.