Closed
Description
#164 adds a paragraph formalizing the meta-schema URI that identifies the semantics defined in the document.
However, it doesn't provide the meta-schema itself. If we want to normatively publish the schema, it would have to be included in the document text. This is exactly what's done for some XML/XSD schemas.
I'm thinking it's a better idea if we keep the meta-schema as an informative document - it's just a special value that validators recognize, and they can use the one provided informatively by us, or they can even write their own meta-schema, or hard-code the rules in logic... whichever option follows the behavior described in the respective documents.