Skip to content

Publication of meta-schema #165

Closed
Closed
@awwright

Description

@awwright

#164 adds a paragraph formalizing the meta-schema URI that identifies the semantics defined in the document.

However, it doesn't provide the meta-schema itself. If we want to normatively publish the schema, it would have to be included in the document text. This is exactly what's done for some XML/XSD schemas.

I'm thinking it's a better idea if we keep the meta-schema as an informative document - it's just a special value that validators recognize, and they can use the one provided informatively by us, or they can even write their own meta-schema, or hard-code the rules in logic... whichever option follows the behavior described in the respective documents.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions