Skip to content

Add test asserting that get_values works by itself #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add test asserting that get_values works by itself #1

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Codym48
Copy link

@Codym48 Codym48 commented Feb 16, 2023

As described in gitpython-developers#1534, this test will fail in main with a KeyError about a missing section name even though the named sections do exist within the config file.

This test will pass in the branch associated with gitpython-developers#1535. This test should keep the improved behavior healthy as the code evolves by preventing future developers from removing the eager loading of sections within get_values().

As described in gitpython-developers#1534, this test will fail in main with a KeyError
about a missing section name even though the named sections do exist
within the config file.

This test will pass in the branch associated with gitpython-developers#1535. This test
should keep the improved behavior healthy as the code evolves by
preventing future developers from removing the eager loading of
sections within get_values().
@Byron
Copy link

Byron commented Feb 16, 2023

@Codym48 Thanks a lot for your help! Are you able to post this PR against the respective PR in GitPython? If not, you can checkout the one this is going to be based on and create a new one in GitPython that contains both commits. That way we don't loose time waiting.

@Codym48
Copy link
Author

Codym48 commented Feb 16, 2023

You're welcome! Sorry, I thought this is what you meant. Did you mean gitpython-developers#1555?

@Byron
Copy link

Byron commented Feb 16, 2023

Yes, that definitely works! Thanks again.

@Codym48 Codym48 closed this by deleting the head repository Feb 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants