-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
add file.codeData to extract user code #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -15,4 +15,6 @@ ${comment.line} Testcase Example: ${testcase} | |
${comment.line} | ||
{{ desc.forEach(function(x) { }}${comment.line} ${x} | ||
{{ }) }}${comment.end} | ||
${comment.singleLine} @lc code=start | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm thinking that adding a single empty line between the block comments and the single line comments. Because in some of the languages the comments styles are different. Besides they belongs to different section. What do you think? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, adding a single empty line is better. |
||
${code} | ||
${comment.singleLine} @lc code=end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use
os.EOL
instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done