Orc removal changes required to make postgres mostly work #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
They triggered warning: moving a local object in a return statement prevents copy elision [-Wpessimizing-move]
|
Hi Andres, The methods for adding MaterializationUnits should take either a JITDylib or a ResourceTracker but not both, since the ResourceTracker implies the JITDylib. Would you like to make the changes? Otherwise I'm happy to do so. |
Are you thinking of exposing this on the the C API level, or only below? Should there be two functions? Or should usage of ResourceTracker be forced?
Whatever is most convenient for you. |
I was thinking I'd mirror the C++ API and provide two versions: One adding to the JITDylib on the default tracker, one taking a custom tracker.
Ok -- I'll update it tomorrow morning. |
|
No luck updating this yet, sorry. Hopefully over the weekend or early next week. |
|
This has been incorporated into the branch manually. |
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2021
This reverts commit 9be8f8b. This breaks tsan on Ubuntu 16.04: $ cat tiny_race.c #include <pthread.h> int Global; void *Thread1(void *x) { Global = 42; return x; } int main() { pthread_t t; pthread_create(&t, NULL, Thread1, NULL); Global = 43; pthread_join(t, NULL); return Global; } $ out/gn/bin/clang -fsanitize=thread -g -O1 tiny_race.c --sysroot ~/src/chrome/src/build/linux/debian_sid_amd64-sysroot/ $ docker run -v $PWD:/foo ubuntu:xenial /foo/a.out FATAL: ThreadSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_platform_linux.cpp:447 "((thr_beg)) >= ((tls_addr))" (0x7fddd76beb80, 0xfffffffffffff980) #0 <null> <null> (a.out+0x4960b6) #1 <null> <null> (a.out+0x4b677f) #2 <null> <null> (a.out+0x49cf94) #3 <null> <null> (a.out+0x499bd2) #4 <null> <null> (a.out+0x42aaf1) swiftlang#5 <null> <null> (libpthread.so.0+0x76b9) swiftlang#6 <null> <null> (libc.so.6+0x1074dc) (Get the sysroot from here: https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chrome-linux-sysroot/toolchain/500976182686961e34974ea7bdc0a21fca32be06/debian_sid_amd64_sysroot.tar.xz) Also reverts follow-on commits: This reverts commit 58c62fd. This reverts commit 31e541e.
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2024
…vm#75394) Calling one of pthread join/detach interceptor on an already joined/detached thread causes asserts such as: AddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56 "((t)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=1236094) #0 0x555555634f8b in __asan::CheckUnwind() compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:69:3 #1 0x55555564e06e in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_termination.cpp:86:24 #2 0x5555556491df in __sanitizer::ThreadArgRetval::BeforeJoin(unsigned long) const compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.cpp:56:3 #3 0x5555556198ed in Join<___interceptor_pthread_tryjoin_np(void*, void**)::<lambda()> > compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_thread_arg_retval.h:74:26 #4 0x5555556198ed in pthread_tryjoin_np compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:311:29 The assert are replaced by error codes.
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
…ext is not fully initialized (llvm#110481) As this comment around target initialization implies: ``` // This can be NULL if we don't know anything about the architecture or if // the target for an architecture isn't enabled in the llvm/clang that we // built ``` There are cases where we might fail to call `InitBuiltinTypes` when creating the backing `ASTContext` for a `TypeSystemClang`. If that happens, the builtins `QualType`s, e.g., `VoidPtrTy`/`IntTy`/etc., are not initialized and dereferencing them as we do in `GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize` (and other places) will lead to nullptr-dereferences. Example backtrace: ``` (lldb) run Assertion failed: (!isNull() && "Cannot retrieve a NULL type pointer"), function getCommonPtr, file Type.h, line 958. Process 2680 stopped * thread swiftlang#15, name = '<lldb.process.internal-state(pid=2712)>', stop reason = hit program assert frame #4: 0x000000010cdf3cdc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ExtractIntFromFormValue(lldb_private::CompilerType const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFFormValue const&) const (.cold.1) + liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ParseObjCMethod(lldb_private::ObjCLanguage::MethodName const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFDIE const&, lldb_private::CompilerType, ParsedDWARFTypeAttributes , bool) (.cold.1): -> 0x10cdf3cdc <+0>: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-0x10]! 0x10cdf3ce0 <+4>: mov x29, sp 0x10cdf3ce4 <+8>: adrp x0, 545 0x10cdf3ce8 <+12>: add x0, x0, #0xa25 ; "ParseObjCMethod" Target 0: (lldb) stopped. (lldb) bt * thread swiftlang#15, name = '<lldb.process.internal-state(pid=2712)>', stop reason = hit program assert frame #0: 0x0000000180d08600 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__pthread_kill + 8 frame #1: 0x0000000180d40f50 libsystem_pthread.dylib`pthread_kill + 288 frame #2: 0x0000000180c4d908 libsystem_c.dylib`abort + 128 frame #3: 0x0000000180c4cc1c libsystem_c.dylib`__assert_rtn + 284 * frame #4: 0x000000010cdf3cdc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DWARFASTParserClang::ExtractIntFromFormValue(lldb_private::CompilerType const&, lldb_private::plugin::dwarf::DWARFFormValue const&) const (.cold.1) + frame swiftlang#5: 0x0000000109d30acc liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`lldb_private::TypeSystemClang::GetBuiltinTypeForEncodingAndBitSize(lldb::Encoding, unsigned long) + 1188 frame swiftlang#6: 0x0000000109aaaed4 liblldb.20.0.0git.dylib`DynamicLoaderMacOS::NotifyBreakpointHit(void*, lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) + 384 ``` This patch adds a one-time user-visible warning for when we fail to initialize the AST to indicate that initialization went wrong for the given target. Additionally, we add checks for whether one of the `ASTContext` `QualType`s is invalid before dereferencing any builtin types. The warning would look as follows: ``` (lldb) target create "a.out" Current executable set to 'a.out' (arm64). (lldb) b main warning: Failed to initialize builtin ASTContext types for target 'some-unknown-triple'. Printing variables may behave unexpectedly. Breakpoint 1: where = a.out`main + 8 at stepping.cpp:5:14, address = 0x0000000100003f90 ``` rdar://134869779
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
Fixes llvm#102703. https://godbolt.org/z/nfj8xsb1Y The following pattern: ``` %2 = and i32 %0, 254 %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 ``` is optimised by instcombine into: ```%3 = icmp ult i32 %0, 2``` However, post instcombine leads to worse aarch64 than the unoptimised version. Pre instcombine: ``` tst w0, #0xfe cset w0, eq ret ``` Post instcombine: ``` and w8, w0, #0xff cmp w8, #2 cset w0, lo ret ``` In the unoptimised version, SelectionDAG converts `SETCC (AND X 254) 0 EQ` into `CSEL 0 1 1 (ANDS X 254)`, which gets emitted as a `tst`. In the optimised version, SelectionDAG converts `SETCC (AND X 255) 2 ULT` into `CSEL 0 1 2 (SUBS (AND X 255) 2)`, which gets emitted as an `and`/`cmp`. This PR adds an optimisation to `AArch64ISelLowering`, converting `SETCC (AND X Y) Z ULT` into `SETCC (AND X (Y & ~(Z - 1))) 0 EQ` when `Z` is a power of two. This makes SelectionDAG/Codegen produce the same optimised code for both examples.
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
…1409)" This reverts commit a89e016. This is being reverted because it broke the test: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test:21:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input CHECK: frame #2: {{.*}}`main
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
…ates explicitly specialized for an implicitly instantiated class template specialization (llvm#113464) Consider the following: ``` template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> struct B { static constexpr int x = 0; // #1 }; template<typename U> struct B<U*> { static constexpr int x = 1; // #2 }; }; template<> template<typename U> struct A<long>::B { static constexpr int x = 2; // #3 }; static_assert(A<short>::B<int>::y == 0); // uses #1 static_assert(A<short>::B<int*>::y == 1); // uses #2 static_assert(A<long>::B<int>::y == 2); // uses #3 static_assert(A<long>::B<int*>::y == 2); // uses #3 ``` According to [temp.spec.partial.member] p2: > If the primary member template is explicitly specialized for a given (implicit) specialization of the enclosing class template, the partial specializations of the member template are ignored for this specialization of the enclosing class template. If a partial specialization of the member template is explicitly specialized for a given (implicit) specialization of the enclosing class template, the primary member template and its other partial specializations are still considered for this specialization of the enclosing class template. The example above fails to compile because we currently don't implement [temp.spec.partial.member] p2. This patch implements the wording, fixing llvm#51051.
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
## Description This PR fixes a segmentation fault that occurs when passing options requiring arguments via `-Xopenmp-target=<triple>`. The issue was that the function `Driver::getOffloadArchs` did not properly parse the extracted option, but instead assumed it was valid, leading to a crash when incomplete arguments were provided. ## Backtrace ```sh llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o 1. Compilation construction 2. Building compilation actions #0 0x0000562fb21c363b llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x392f63b) #1 0x0000562fb21c0e3c SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0 #2 0x00007fcbf6c81420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420) #3 0x0000562fb1fa5d70 llvm::opt::Option::matches(llvm::opt::OptSpecifier) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x3711d70) #4 0x0000562fb2a78e7d clang::driver::Driver::getOffloadArchs(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList const&, clang::driver::Action::OffloadKind, clang::driver::ToolChain const*, bool) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e4e7d) swiftlang#5 0x0000562fb2a7a9aa clang::driver::Driver::BuildOffloadingActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*> const&, clang::driver::Action*) const (.part.1164) Driver.cpp:0:0 swiftlang#6 0x0000562fb2a7c093 clang::driver::Driver::BuildActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*>, 16u> const&, llvm::SmallVector<clang::driver::Action*, 3u>&) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e8093) swiftlang#7 0x0000562fb2a8395d clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41ef95d) swiftlang#8 0x0000562faf92684c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x109284c) swiftlang#9 0x0000562faf826cc6 main (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0xf92cc6) swiftlang#10 0x00007fcbf6699083 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-LcI20x/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:342:3 swiftlang#11 0x0000562faf923a5e _start (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x108fa5e) [1] 2628042 segmentation fault (core dumped) main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o ```
lhames
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
llvm#118923) …d reentry. These utilities provide new, more generic and easier to use support for lazy compilation in ORC. LazyReexportsManager is an alternative to LazyCallThroughManager. It takes requests for lazy re-entry points in the form of an alias map: lazy-reexports = { ( <entry point symbol #1>, <implementation symbol #1> ), ( <entry point symbol #2>, <implementation symbol #2> ), ... ( <entry point symbol #n>, <implementation symbol #n> ) } LazyReexportsManager then: 1. binds the entry points to the implementation names in an internal table. 2. creates a JIT re-entry trampoline for each entry point. 3. creates a redirectable symbol for each of the entry point name and binds redirectable symbol to the corresponding reentry trampoline. When an entry point symbol is first called at runtime (which may be on any thread of the JIT'd program) it will re-enter the JIT via the trampoline and trigger a lookup for the implementation symbol stored in LazyReexportsManager's internal table. When the lookup completes the entry point symbol will be updated (via the RedirectableSymbolManager) to point at the implementation symbol, and execution will proceed to the implementation symbol. Actual construction of the re-entry trampolines and redirectable symbols is delegated to an EmitTrampolines functor and the RedirectableSymbolsManager respectively. JITLinkReentryTrampolines.h provides a JITLink-based implementation of the EmitTrampolines functor. (AArch64 only in this patch, but other architectures will be added in the near future). Register state save and reentry functionality is added to the ORC runtime in the __orc_rt_sysv_resolve and __orc_rt_resolve_implementation functions (the latter is generic, the former will need custom implementations for each ABI and architecture to be supported, however this should be much less effort than the existing OrcABISupport approach, since the ORC runtime allows this code to be written as native assembly). The resulting system: 1. Works equally well for in-process and out-of-process JIT'd code. 2. Requires less boilerplate to set up. Given an ObjectLinkingLayer and PlatformJD (JITDylib containing the ORC runtime), setup is just: ```c++ auto RSMgr = JITLinkRedirectableSymbolManager::Create(OLL); if (!RSMgr) return RSMgr.takeError(); auto LRMgr = createJITLinkLazyReexportsManager(OLL, **RSMgr, PlatformJD); if (!LRMgr) return LRMgr.takeError(); ``` after which lazy reexports can be introduced with: ```c++ JD.define(lazyReexports(LRMgr, <alias map>)); ``` LazyObectLinkingLayer is updated to use this new method, but the LLVM-IR level CompileOnDemandLayer will continue to use LazyCallThroughManager and OrcABISupport until the new system supports a wider range of architectures and ABIs. The llvm-jitlink utility's -lazy option now uses the new scheme. Since it depends on the ORC runtime, the lazy-link.ll testcase and associated helpers are moved to the ORC runtime.
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
The Clang binary (and any binary linking Clang as a library), when built
using PIE, ends up with a pretty shocking number of dynamic relocations
to apply to the executable image: roughly 400k.
Each of these takes up binary space in the executable, and perhaps most
interestingly takes start-up time to apply the relocations.
The largest pattern I identified were the strings used to describe
target builtins. The addresses of these string literals were stored into
huge arrays, each one requiring a dynamic relocation. The way to avoid
this is to design the target builtins to use a single large table of
strings and offsets within the table for the individual strings. This
switches the builtin management to such a scheme.
This saves over 100k dynamic relocations by my measurement, an over 25%
reduction. Just looking at byte size improvements, using the `bloaty`
tool to compare a newly built `clang` binary to an old one:
```
FILE SIZE VM SIZE
-------------- --------------
+1.4% +653Ki +1.4% +653Ki .rodata
+0.0% +960 +0.0% +960 .text
+0.0% +197 +0.0% +197 .dynstr
+0.0% +184 +0.0% +184 .eh_frame
+0.0% +96 +0.0% +96 .dynsym
+0.0% +40 +0.0% +40 .eh_frame_hdr
+114% +32 [ = ] 0 [Unmapped]
+0.0% +20 +0.0% +20 .gnu.hash
+0.0% +8 +0.0% +8 .gnu.version
+0.9% +7 +0.9% +7 [LOAD #2 [R]]
[ = ] 0 -75.4% -3.00Ki .relro_padding
-16.1% -802Ki -16.1% -802Ki .data.rel.ro
-27.3% -2.52Mi -27.3% -2.52Mi .rela.dyn
-1.6% -2.66Mi -1.6% -2.66Mi TOTAL
```
We get a 16% reduction in the `.data.rel.ro` section, and nearly 30%
reduction in `.rela.dyn` where those reloctaions are stored.
This is also visible in my benchmarking of binary start-up overhead at
least:
```
Benchmark 1: ./old_clang --version
Time (mean ± σ): 17.6 ms ± 1.5 ms [User: 4.1 ms, System: 13.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 14.2 ms … 22.8 ms 162 runs
Benchmark 2: ./new_clang --version
Time (mean ± σ): 15.5 ms ± 1.4 ms [User: 3.6 ms, System: 11.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 12.4 ms … 20.3 ms 216 runs
Summary
'./new_clang --version' ran
1.13 ± 0.14 times faster than './old_clang --version'
```
We get about 2ms faster `--version` runs. While there is a lot of noise
in binary execution time, this delta is pretty consistent, and
represents over 10% improvement. This is particularly interesting to me
because for very short source files, repeatedly starting the `clang`
binary is actually the dominant cost. For example, `configure` scripts
running against the `clang` compiler are slow in large part because of
binary start up time, not the time to process the actual inputs to the
compiler.
----
This PR implements the string tables using `constexpr` code and the
existing macro system. I understand that the builtins are moving towards
a TableGen model, and if complete that would provide more options for
modeling this. Unfortunately, that migration isn't complete, and even
the parts that are migrated still rely on the ability to break out of
the TableGen model and directly expand an X-macro style `BUILTIN(...)`
textually. I looked at trying to complete the move to TableGen, but it
would both require the difficult migration of the remaining targets, and
solving some tricky problems with how to move away from any macro-based
expansion.
I was also able to find a reasonably clean and effective way of doing
this with the existing macros and some `constexpr` code that I think is
clean enough to be a pretty good intermediate state, and maybe give a
good target for the eventual TableGen solution. I was also able to
factor the macros into set of consistent patterns that avoids a
significant regression in overall boilerplate.
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
llvm#123877) Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g., https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio ASan output from local re-run: ``` ==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8 READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0 #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344 #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9 #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42 #3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40 #4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3 swiftlang#5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15 swiftlang#6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3 swiftlang#7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15 swiftlang#8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12 swiftlang#9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15 swiftlang#10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12 swiftlang#11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12 swiftlang#12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3 swiftlang#13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14 swiftlang#14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14 swiftlang#15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10 swiftlang#16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16 swiftlang#17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3 swiftlang#18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60) ```
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2025
We can't guaranty that underlying string is 0-terminated and [String.size()] is even in the same allocation. https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/4152/steps/17/logs/stdio ``` ==c-index-test==1846256==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:96:36 #1 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:521:39 #2 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7 #3 in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7 #4 in DumpCXComment llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:685:3 swiftlang#5 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:768:7 Memory was marked as uninitialized #0 in __msan_allocated_memory llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1023:5 #1 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:172:7 #2 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:216:12 #3 in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:53:43 #4 in Allocate<char> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:76:29 swiftlang#5 in convertCodePointToUTF8 llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:42:30 swiftlang#6 in clang::comments::Lexer::resolveHTMLDecimalCharacterReference(llvm::StringRef) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:76:10 swiftlang#7 in clang::comments::Lexer::lexHTMLCharacterReference(clang::comments::Token&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:615:16 swiftlang#8 in consumeToken llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/CommentParser.h:62:9 swiftlang#9 in clang::comments::Parser::parseParagraphOrBlockCommand() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp swiftlang#10 in clang::comments::Parser::parseFullComment() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp:925:22 swiftlang#11 in clang::RawComment::parse(clang::ASTContext const&, clang::Preprocessor const*, clang::Decl const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RawCommentList.cpp:221:12 swiftlang#12 in clang::ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(clang::Decl const*, clang::Preprocessor const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:714:35 swiftlang#13 in clang_Cursor_getParsedComment llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXComment.cpp:36:35 swiftlang#14 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:756:25 ```
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2025
Reverts llvm#125020 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/5252/steps/12/logs/stdio ``` ==c-index-test==2512295==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0xe19338c27992 at pc 0xc66be4784830 bp 0xe0e33660df00 sp 0xe0e33660d6e8 READ of size 23 at 0xe19338c27992 thread T1 #0 0xc66be478482c in printf_common(void*, char const*, std::__va_list) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:563:9 #1 0xc66be478643c in vprintf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1699:1 #2 0xc66be478643c in printf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1757:1 #3 0xc66be4839384 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1359:5 #4 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11 swiftlang#5 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp 0xe19338c27992 is located 82 bytes inside of 105-byte region [0xe19338c27940,0xe19338c279a9) freed by thread T1 here: #0 0xc66be480040c in free /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:51:3 #1 0xc66be4839728 in GetCursorSource c-index-test.c #2 0xc66be4839368 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1360:12 #3 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11 #4 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp previously allocated by thread T1 here: #0 0xc66be4800680 in malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67:3 #1 0xe4e3456379b0 in safe_malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MemAlloc.h:26:18 #2 0xe4e3456379b0 in createDup /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:95:40 #3 0xe4e3456379b0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:90:10 ```
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2025
…127087) Fixes the following crash in clang-repl ```c++ clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '(' 1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } | ^ | ( clang-repl: /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1757: void clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*): Assertion `D->getLexicalDeclContext() == this && "Decl inserted into wrong lexical context"' failed. #0 0x000059b28459e6da llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:22 #1 0x000059b28459eaed PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:880:1 #2 0x000059b28459bf7f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20 #3 0x000059b28459df8e SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:418:13 #4 0x000077cdf444ea50 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42a50) swiftlang#5 0x000077cdf44aee3b pthread_kill (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0xa2e3b) swiftlang#6 0x000077cdf444e928 raise (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42928) swiftlang#7 0x000077cdf443156c abort (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2556c) swiftlang#8 0x000077cdf44314d2 __assert_perror_fail (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x254d2) swiftlang#9 0x000077cdf4444c56 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x38c56) swiftlang#10 0x000059b28495bfc4 clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1759:3 swiftlang#11 0x000059b28495c0f5 clang::DeclContext::addDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1785:37 swiftlang#12 0x000059b28773cc2a clang::Sema::ActOnStartTopLevelStmtDecl(clang::Scope*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:20302:18 swiftlang#13 0x000059b286f1efdf clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelStmtDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:6024:62 swiftlang#14 0x000059b286ef18ee clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1065:35 swiftlang#15 0x000059b286ef0702 clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, clang::Sema::ModuleImportState&) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:758:36 swiftlang#16 0x000059b28562dff2 clang::IncrementalParser::ParseOrWrapTopLevelDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:66:36 swiftlang#17 0x000059b28562e5b7 clang::IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:132:8 swiftlang#18 0x000059b28561832b clang::Interpreter::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:570:8 swiftlang#19 0x000059b285618cbd clang::Interpreter::ParseAndExecute(llvm::StringRef, clang::Value*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:649:8 swiftlang#20 0x000059b2836f9343 main /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/tools/clang-repl/ClangRepl.cpp:255:59 swiftlang#21 0x000077cdf443388e (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2788e) swiftlang#22 0x000077cdf443394a __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2794a) swiftlang#23 0x000059b2836f7965 _start (./bin/clang-repl+0x73b8965) fish: Job 1, './bin/clang-repl' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort) ``` With this change: ```c++ clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '(' 1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; } | ^ | ( error: Parsing failed. clang-repl> 1; clang-repl> %quit ```
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2025
For function declarations (i.e. func op has no entry block), the FunctionOpInterface method `insertArgument` and `eraseArgument` will cause segfault. This PR guards against manipulation of empty entry block by checking whether func op is external. An example can be seen in google/heir#1324 The segfault trace ``` #1 0x0000560f1289d9db PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:874:1 #2 0x0000560f1289b116 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:5 #3 0x0000560f1289e145 SignalHandler(int) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:415:1 #4 0x00007f829a3d9520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520) swiftlang#5 0x0000560f1257f8bc void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:162:23 swiftlang#6 0x0000560f1257f84d void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>&, mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:520:2 swiftlang#7 0x0000560f12580498 void std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::_M_insert_aux<mlir::BlockArgument>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:405:7 swiftlang#8 0x0000560f1257cf7e std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument const*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument const&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:154:6 swiftlang#9 0x0000560f1257b349 mlir::Block::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:178:13 swiftlang#10 0x0000560f123d2a1c mlir::function_interface_impl::insertFunctionArguments(mlir::FunctionOpInterface, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>, unsigned int, mlir::Type) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.cpp:232:11 swiftlang#11 0x0000560f0be6b727 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArguments(llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:809:7 swiftlang#12 0x0000560f0be6b536 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::DictionaryAttr, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:796:7 ```
lhames
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
When compiling VLS SVE, the compiler often replaces VL-based offsets
with immediate-based ones. This leads to a mismatch in the allowed
addressing modes due to SVE loads/stores generally expecting immediate
offsets relative to VL. For example, given:
```c
svfloat64_t foo(const double *x) {
svbool_t pg = svptrue_b64();
return svld1_f64(pg, x+svcntd());
}
```
When compiled with `-msve-vector-bits=128`, we currently generate:
```gas
foo:
ptrue p0.d
mov x8, #2
ld1d { z0.d }, p0/z, [x0, x8, lsl #3]
ret
```
Instead, we could be generating:
```gas
foo:
ldr z0, [x0, #1, mul vl]
ret
```
Likewise for other types, stores, and other VLS lengths.
This patch achieves the above by extending `SelectAddrModeIndexedSVE`
to let constants through when `vscale` is known.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.