Skip to content

Export and document all log macros. #1682

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

tnull
Copy link
Contributor

@tnull tnull commented Aug 24, 2022

Previously, only log_error and log_trace macros have been exported.

This change exports the macros of all log levels, which enables them to be used downstream.

Previously, only `log_error` and `log_trace` macros have been exported.
This change exports the macros of all log levels, which enables them to
be used downstream.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1682 (c7c88a6) into main (b84b53a) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 92.57%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1682      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.77%   90.86%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          80       85       +5     
  Lines       44763    45714     +951     
  Branches    44763    45714     +951     
==========================================
+ Hits        40632    41536     +904     
- Misses       4131     4178      +47     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/lib.rs 93.23% <ø> (ø)
lightning-block-sync/src/test_utils.rs 93.46% <ø> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs 89.93% <0.00%> (+2.16%) ⬆️
lightning-net-tokio/src/lib.rs 77.16% <0.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
lightning-rapid-gossip-sync/src/lib.rs 90.90% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/mod.rs 68.18% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/lib.rs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/mod.rs 95.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs 96.25% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/util/config.rs 66.66% <0.00%> (-0.78%) ⬇️
... and 46 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants