Skip to content

Replace manual node reloading with a macro/function in tests #1853

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2022

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #1696

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 15, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 90.68% // Head: 90.68% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (8d8ee55) compared to base (8d8ee55).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 8d8ee55 differs from pull request most recent head 97b210d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 97b210d to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1853   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.68%   90.68%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines       47947    47947           
  Branches    47947    47947           
=======================================
  Hits        43481    43481           
  Misses       4466     4466           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@dunxen dunxen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, basically LGTM! And the added bonus of taming the functional_tests behemoth a bit :D

Copy link
Contributor

@wpaulino wpaulino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Restored the previous default-config:

$ git diff-tree -U1 017901def ef7910590
diff --git a/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs b/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs
index 1d9d27568..ade02c48c 100644
--- a/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs
@@ -574,3 +574,3 @@ fn do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(use_dust: bool) {
 
-	reload_node!(nodes[0], nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized], first_persister, first_new_chain_monitor, first_nodes_0_deserialized);
+	reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized], first_persister, first_new_chain_monitor, first_nodes_0_deserialized);
 	nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
@@ -666,3 +666,3 @@ fn do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(use_dust: bool) {
 
-	reload_node!(nodes[0], nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], second_persister, second_new_chain_monitor, second_nodes_0_deserialized);
+	reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], second_persister, second_new_chain_monitor, second_nodes_0_deserialized);
 	nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
@@ -686,3 +686,3 @@ fn do_test_completed_payment_not_retryable_on_reload(use_dust: bool) {
 	// Ensure that after reload we cannot retry the payment.
-	reload_node!(nodes[0], nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], third_persister, third_new_chain_monitor, third_nodes_0_deserialized);
+	reload_node!(nodes[0], test_default_channel_config(), nodes_0_serialized, &[&chan_0_monitor_serialized, &chan_1_monitor_serialized], third_persister, third_new_chain_monitor, third_nodes_0_deserialized);
 	nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2022
wpaulino
wpaulino previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2022
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt dismissed stale reviews from wpaulino and dunxen via 97b210d November 15, 2022 22:38
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Grr, sorry, had to rebase to address a trivial conflict.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DRY/Macro-ize the node reload logic in functional tests
4 participants