-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 403
Set return type to Iterator for functions in file: lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
: issue #2240
#2290
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jkczyz
merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:main
from
upjohnc:2240_replace_vectors_with_iterators
Jun 5, 2023
Merged
Set return type to Iterator for functions in file: lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
: issue #2240
#2290
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this work if, for example, there's one iterator with zero elements and another iterator with 5? On each loop iteration/function call we check the first iterator, see its empty, increment
exhausted_iterators
, and then returnSome
for the next iterator. Once we've done that once we'll returnNone
, even though we have more elements from another iterator.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Once we yield
Some
, the next call will resetexhausted_iterators
to zero since it is a local variable, IIUC.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops indeed, you're right.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add to the comment to help with the explanation of how the loop function. Each of us has needed to think through it, so maybe a comment with help with future reading of the code.