Skip to content

Make clippy shut up about PartialOrd and Ord both impl'd #2650

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Clippy gets mad that we have an implementation of ParialOrd and Ord separately, even though both are identical. Making ParitalOrd call Ord makes clippy shut up.

Clippy gets mad that we have an implementation of `ParialOrd` and
`Ord` separately, even though both are identical. Making
`ParitalOrd` call `Ord` makes clippy shut up.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (eea19de) 89.00% compared to head (ec7d665) 89.01%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2650   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.00%   89.01%           
=======================================
  Files         112      112           
  Lines       87157    87157           
  Branches    87157    87157           
=======================================
+ Hits        77574    77580    +6     
  Misses       7339     7339           
+ Partials     2244     2238    -6     
Files Coverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs 85.23% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt added this to the 0.0.118 milestone Oct 12, 2023
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit 6cafba9 into lightningdevkit:main Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants