Skip to content

[clang][bytecode] Fix lookup of source locations in implicit ctors #107992

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

tbaederr
Copy link
Contributor

Implicit functions may still have a body. The !hasBody() check is enough.

@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" labels Sep 10, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Sep 10, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

Changes

Implicit functions may still have a body. The !hasBody() check is enough.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107992.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp (+5-5)
  • (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/builtin-functions.cpp (+7)
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp
index 6830a7b37f1da5..6c1e446458dc57 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpFrame.cpp
@@ -210,28 +210,28 @@ Pointer InterpFrame::getParamPointer(unsigned Off) {
 SourceInfo InterpFrame::getSource(CodePtr PC) const {
   // Implicitly created functions don't have any code we could point at,
   // so return the call site.
-  if (Func && (!Func->hasBody() || Func->getDecl()->isImplicit()) && Caller)
+  if (Func && !Func->hasBody() && Caller)
     return Caller->getSource(RetPC);
 
   return S.getSource(Func, PC);
 }
 
 const Expr *InterpFrame::getExpr(CodePtr PC) const {
-  if (Func && (!Func->hasBody() || Func->getDecl()->isImplicit()) && Caller)
-    return Caller->getExpr(RetPC);
+  if (Func && !Func->hasBody() && Caller)
+    return Caller->getExpr(PC);
 
   return S.getExpr(Func, PC);
 }
 
 SourceLocation InterpFrame::getLocation(CodePtr PC) const {
-  if (Func && (!Func->hasBody() || Func->getDecl()->isImplicit()) && Caller)
+  if (Func && !Func->hasBody() && Caller)
     return Caller->getLocation(RetPC);
 
   return S.getLocation(Func, PC);
 }
 
 SourceRange InterpFrame::getRange(CodePtr PC) const {
-  if (Func && (!Func->hasBody() || Func->getDecl()->isImplicit()) && Caller)
+  if (Func && !Func->hasBody() && Caller)
     return Caller->getRange(RetPC);
 
   return S.getRange(Func, PC);
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/builtin-functions.cpp b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/builtin-functions.cpp
index 9c9ca23e0a6a69..9fd5eae67a21f6 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/builtin-functions.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/builtin-functions.cpp
@@ -968,3 +968,10 @@ namespace FunctionStart {
   static_assert(__builtin_function_start(a) == a, ""); // both-error {{not an integral constant expression}} \
                                                        // both-note {{comparison of addresses of literals has unspecified value}}
 }
+
+namespace BuiltinInImplicitCtor {
+  constexpr struct {
+    int a = __builtin_isnan(1.0);
+  } Foo;
+  static_assert(Foo.a == 0, "");
+}

Implicit functions may still have a body. The !hasBody() check is
enough.
@tbaederr tbaederr changed the title [clang][bytecode] Fix lookup in source locations in implicit ctors [clang][bytecode] Fix lookup of source locations in implicit ctors Sep 10, 2024
@tbaederr tbaederr merged commit d03822d into llvm:main Sep 11, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:frontend Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema" clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants