-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.7k
[mlir][Vector] Support poison in vector.shuffle
mask
#122188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-spirv Author: Diego Caballero (dcaballe) ChangesThis PR extends the existing poison support in https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/UBOps/ by representing poison mask values in The current implementation parses and prints Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122188.diff 5 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.td b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.td
index 30a5b06374fad1..a786e4696415cb 100644
--- a/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.td
+++ b/mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.td
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ def Vector_ShuffleOp
The shuffle operation constructs a permutation (or duplication) of elements
from two input vectors, returning a vector with the same element type as
the input and a length that is the same as the shuffle mask. The two input
- vectors must have the same element type, same rank , and trailing dimension
+ vectors must have the same element type, same rank, and trailing dimension
sizes and shuffles their values in the
leading dimension (which may differ in size) according to the given mask.
The legality rules are:
@@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ def Vector_ShuffleOp
* the mask length equals the leading dimension size of the result
* numbering the input vector indices left to right across the operands, all
mask values must be within range, viz. given two k-D operands v1 and v2
- above, all mask values are in the range [0,s_1+t_1)
+ above, all mask values are in the range [0,s_1+t_1). -1 is used to
+ represent a poison mask value.
Note, scalable vectors are not supported.
@@ -463,10 +464,15 @@ def Vector_ShuffleOp
: vector<2xf32>, vector<2xf32> ; yields vector<4xf32>
%3 = vector.shuffle %a, %b[0, 1]
: vector<f32>, vector<f32> ; yields vector<2xf32>
+ %4 = vector.shuffle %a, %b[0, 4, -1, -1, -1, -1]
+ : vector<4xf32>, vector<4xf32> ; yields vector<6xf32>
```
}];
let extraClassDeclaration = [{
+ // Integer to represent a poison value in a vector shuffle mask.
+ static constexpr int64_t kMaskPoisonValue = -1;
+
VectorType getV1VectorType() {
return ::llvm::cast<VectorType>(getV1().getType());
}
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp
index ae1cf95732336a..696d1e0f9b1e68 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/IR/VectorOps.cpp
@@ -2600,7 +2600,7 @@ LogicalResult ShuffleOp::verify() {
int64_t indexSize = (v1Type.getRank() == 0 ? 1 : v1Type.getDimSize(0)) +
(v2Type.getRank() == 0 ? 1 : v2Type.getDimSize(0));
for (auto [idx, maskPos] : llvm::enumerate(mask)) {
- if (maskPos < 0 || maskPos >= indexSize)
+ if (maskPos != kMaskPoisonValue && (maskPos < 0 || maskPos >= indexSize))
return emitOpError("mask index #") << (idx + 1) << " out of range";
}
return success();
diff --git a/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToLLVM/vector-to-llvm.mlir b/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToLLVM/vector-to-llvm.mlir
index f95e943250bd44..931cc36c9d4a88 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToLLVM/vector-to-llvm.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToLLVM/vector-to-llvm.mlir
@@ -1105,6 +1105,16 @@ func.func @shuffle_1D_index_direct(%arg0: vector<2xindex>, %arg1: vector<2xindex
// -----
+func.func @shuffle_poison_mask(%arg0: vector<2xf32>, %arg1: vector<2xf32>) -> vector<4xf32> {
+ %1 = vector.shuffle %arg0, %arg1 [0, -1, 3, -1] : vector<2xf32>, vector<2xf32>
+ return %1 : vector<4xf32>
+}
+// CHECK-LABEL: @shuffle_poison_mask(
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[A:.*]]: vector<2xf32>, %[[B:.*]]: vector<2xf32>)
+// CHECK: %[[s:.*]] = llvm.shufflevector %[[A]], %[[B]] [0, -1, 3, -1] : vector<2xf32>
+
+// -----
+
func.func @shuffle_1D(%arg0: vector<2xf32>, %arg1: vector<3xf32>) -> vector<5xf32> {
%1 = vector.shuffle %arg0, %arg1 [4, 3, 2, 1, 0] : vector<2xf32>, vector<3xf32>
return %1 : vector<5xf32>
diff --git a/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToSPIRV/vector-to-spirv.mlir b/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToSPIRV/vector-to-spirv.mlir
index 103148633bf97c..fd73cea5e4f306 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToSPIRV/vector-to-spirv.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Conversion/VectorToSPIRV/vector-to-spirv.mlir
@@ -613,6 +613,17 @@ func.func @shuffle(%v0 : vector<4xi32>, %v1: vector<4xi32>) -> vector<1xi32> {
// -----
+// CHECK-LABEL: func @shuffle
+// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.+]]: vector<4xi32>, %[[ARG1:.+]]: vector<4xi32>
+// CHECK: %[[SHUFFLE:.*]] = spirv.VectorShuffle [1 : i32, -1 : i32, 5 : i32, -1 : i32] %[[ARG0]], %[[ARG1]] : vector<4xi32>, vector<4xi32> -> vector<4xi32>
+// CHECK: return %[[SHUFFLE]] : vector<4xi32>
+func.func @shuffle(%v0 : vector<4xi32>, %v1: vector<4xi32>) -> vector<4xi32> {
+ %shuffle = vector.shuffle %v0, %v1 [1, -1, 5, -1] : vector<4xi32>, vector<4xi32>
+ return %shuffle : vector<4xi32>
+}
+
+// -----
+
// CHECK-LABEL: func @interleave
// CHECK-SAME: (%[[ARG0:.+]]: vector<2xf32>, %[[ARG1:.+]]: vector<2xf32>)
// CHECK: %[[SHUFFLE:.*]] = spirv.VectorShuffle [0 : i32, 2 : i32, 1 : i32, 3 : i32] %[[ARG0]], %[[ARG1]] : vector<2xf32>, vector<2xf32> -> vector<4xf32>
diff --git a/mlir/test/Dialect/Vector/ops.mlir b/mlir/test/Dialect/Vector/ops.mlir
index 961f1b5ffeabec..cd6f3f518a1c07 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Dialect/Vector/ops.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Dialect/Vector/ops.mlir
@@ -190,6 +190,13 @@ func.func @shuffle2D(%a: vector<1x4xf32>, %b: vector<2x4xf32>) -> vector<3x4xf32
return %1 : vector<3x4xf32>
}
+// CHECK-LABEL: @shuffle_poison_mask
+func.func @shuffle_poison_mask(%a: vector<4xf32>, %b: vector<4xf32>) -> vector<4xf32> {
+ // CHECK: vector.shuffle %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}[1, -1, 6, -1] : vector<4xf32>, vector<4xf32>
+ %1 = vector.shuffle %a, %a[1, -1, 6, -1] : vector<4xf32>, vector<4xf32>
+ return %1 : vector<4xf32>
+}
+
// CHECK-LABEL: @extract_element_0d
func.func @extract_element_0d(%a: vector<f32>) -> f32 {
// CHECK-NEXT: vector.extractelement %{{.*}}[] : vector<f32>
|
Ping :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good overall, just one minor issue.
Would be nice to leave a TODO somewhere to handle this in folds/cannon patterns, e.g., extract, extract_strided_slice, etc.
@@ -613,6 +613,17 @@ func.func @shuffle(%v0 : vector<4xi32>, %v1: vector<4xi32>) -> vector<1xi32> { | |||
|
|||
// ----- | |||
|
|||
// CHECK-LABEL: func @shuffle | |||
// CHECK-SAME: %[[ARG0:.+]]: vector<4xi32>, %[[ARG1:.+]]: vector<4xi32> | |||
// CHECK: %[[SHUFFLE:.*]] = spirv.VectorShuffle [1 : i32, -1 : i32, 5 : i32, -1 : i32] %[[ARG0]], %[[ARG1]] : vector<4xi32>, vector<4xi32> -> vector<4xi32> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SPIR-V requires poison elements to be 0xFFFFFFFF instead of -1: https://registry.khronos.org/SPIR-V/specs/unified1/SPIRV.html#:~:text=A%20Component%20literal%20may%20also%20be%20FFFFFFFF%2C%20which%20means%20the%20corresponding%20result%20component%20has%20no%20source%20and%20is%20undefined.%20All%20Component%20literals%20must%20either%20be%20FFFFFFFF%20or%20in%20%5B0%2C%20N%20%2D%201%5D . Because the indices are I32ArrayAttr
in MLIR, I don't think we need to do anything here, despite the textual format looking as if this is incorrect.
This PR extends the existing poison support in https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/UBOps/ by representing poison mask values in `vector.shuffle`. Similar to LLVM (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h#L1884) this requires defining an integer value (`-1`) representing poison in the `vector.shuffle` mask. The current implementation parses and prints `-1` for the poison value. I implemented a custom parser/printer to use the `poison` keyword instead but I think it's an overkill to have to introduce a hand-written parsers/printers for every operation supporting poison. I also explored adding new flavors of `DenseIXArrayAttr` that could take an argument to represent the poison value, but I also desisted as the resulting code was too complex. Happy to get feedback about this and improve the assembly format as a follow-up.
fce7781
to
7deabd4
Compare
Thanks!
I added this to the ops' doc. I already have some of this implemented. |
Following up on llvm#122188, this PR adds support for poison indices to `ExtractOp` and `InsertOp`. It also includes canonicalization patterns to turn extract/insert ops with poison indices into `ub.poison`.
Following up on llvm#122188, this PR adds support for poison indices to `ExtractOp` and `InsertOp`. It also includes canonicalization patterns to turn extract/insert ops with poison indices into `ub.poison`.
This PR extends the existing poison support in https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/UBOps/ by representing poison mask values in
vector.shuffle
. Similar to LLVM (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h#L1884) this requires defining an integer value (-1
) to represent poison in thevector.shuffle
mask.The current implementation parses and prints
-1
for the poison value. I implemented a custom parser/printer to use thepoison
keyword instead but, on a second thought, I removed it from the PR. I think it's an overkill to have to introduce a hand-written parser/printer for every operation supporting poison. I also explored adding new flavors ofDenseIXArrayAttr
that could take an argument to represent the poison value, but the code turned quite complex so I also desisted. Happy to get feedback about this and improve the assembly format as a follow-up!