-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
AMDGPU: Use helper function for use/def chain walk #129052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AMDGPU: Use helper function for use/def chain walk #129052
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm) ChangesPeepholeOpt has a nicer version of this which handles more Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129052.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp
index f1ba199fbae3f..6cb6863068b5f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIFoldOperands.cpp
@@ -781,6 +781,27 @@ bool SIFoldOperandsImpl::isUseSafeToFold(const MachineInstr &MI,
return !TII->isSDWA(MI);
}
+static MachineOperand *lookUpCopyChain(const SIInstrInfo &TII,
+ const MachineRegisterInfo &MRI,
+ Register SrcReg) {
+ MachineOperand *Sub = nullptr;
+ for (MachineInstr *SubDef = MRI.getVRegDef(SrcReg);
+ SubDef && TII.isFoldableCopy(*SubDef);
+ SubDef = MRI.getVRegDef(Sub->getReg())) {
+ MachineOperand &SrcOp = SubDef->getOperand(1);
+ if (SrcOp.isImm())
+ return &SrcOp;
+ if (!SrcOp.isReg() || SrcOp.getReg().isPhysical())
+ break;
+ Sub = &SrcOp;
+ // TODO: Support compose
+ if (SrcOp.getSubReg())
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return Sub;
+}
+
// Find a def of the UseReg, check if it is a reg_sequence and find initializers
// for each subreg, tracking it to foldable inline immediate if possible.
// Returns true on success.
@@ -791,26 +812,24 @@ bool SIFoldOperandsImpl::getRegSeqInit(
if (!Def || !Def->isRegSequence())
return false;
- for (unsigned I = 1, E = Def->getNumExplicitOperands(); I < E; I += 2) {
- MachineOperand *Sub = &Def->getOperand(I);
- assert(Sub->isReg());
-
- for (MachineInstr *SubDef = MRI->getVRegDef(Sub->getReg());
- SubDef && Sub->isReg() && Sub->getReg().isVirtual() &&
- !Sub->getSubReg() && TII->isFoldableCopy(*SubDef);
- SubDef = MRI->getVRegDef(Sub->getReg())) {
- MachineOperand *Op = &SubDef->getOperand(1);
- if (Op->isImm()) {
- if (TII->isInlineConstant(*Op, OpTy))
- Sub = Op;
- break;
- }
- if (!Op->isReg() || Op->getReg().isPhysical())
- break;
- Sub = Op;
+ for (unsigned I = 1, E = Def->getNumExplicitOperands(); I != E; I += 2) {
+ MachineOperand &SrcOp = Def->getOperand(I);
+ unsigned SubRegIdx = Def->getOperand(I + 1).getImm();
+
+ if (SrcOp.getSubReg()) {
+ // TODO: Handle subregister compose
+ Defs.emplace_back(&SrcOp, SubRegIdx);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ MachineOperand *DefSrc = lookUpCopyChain(*TII, *MRI, SrcOp.getReg());
+ if (DefSrc && (DefSrc->isReg() ||
+ (DefSrc->isImm() && TII->isInlineConstant(*DefSrc, OpTy)))) {
+ Defs.emplace_back(DefSrc, SubRegIdx);
+ continue;
}
- Defs.emplace_back(Sub, Def->getOperand(I + 1).getImm());
+ Defs.emplace_back(&SrcOp, SubRegIdx);
}
return true;
|
PeepholeOpt has a nicer version of this which handles more cases.
d3d3005
to
0d18d8c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but:
PeepholeOpt has a nicer version of this which handles more cases.
Which function/mechanism would this be? And is this the implication that we'll move towards using what peepholeopt is using (or perhaps modify this into something that's as encompassing as the peepholeopt one)?
ValueTracker. I'd like to rewrite this one to look more like PeepholeOpt in a few ways, but I don't think we can replace one with the other |
PeepholeOpt has a nicer version of this which handles more cases.
PeepholeOpt has a nicer version of this which handles more
cases.