[InstCombine] Use MapVector for SourceAggregates. #132564
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
foldAggregateConstructionIntoAggregateReuse iterates over the entries of SourceAggregates and the order of inserted instructions depends on the order of the iterator. Using a regular DenseMap can lead to non-deterministic value naming/numbering.
I don't think it can actually impact the generated binary, but it makes diffing IR more difficult. If desired, I could provide a test case showing the difference in naming.