[libcxx][NFC] Use macros for functions that support overriding detection

libcxx/src/include/overridable_function.h

@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@
 #if defined(_LIBCPP_OBJECT_FORMAT_MACHO)
 
 #  define _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION 1
-#  define _LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE                                                                 \
-    __attribute__((__section__("__TEXT,__lcxx_override,regular,pure_instructions")))
+#  define _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(type, name, arglist)                                                            \
+    __attribute__((__section__("__TEXT,__lcxx_override,regular,pure_instructions"))) _LIBCPP_WEAK type name arglist
 
 _LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-template <class _Ret, class... _Args>
-_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool __is_function_overridden(_Ret (*__fptr)(_Args...)) noexcept {
+template <typename T, T* _Func>
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI inline bool __is_function_overridden() noexcept {
   // Declare two dummy bytes and give them these special `__asm` values. These values are
   // defined by the linker, which means that referring to `&__lcxx_override_start` will
   // effectively refer to the address where the section starts (and same for the end).
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool __is_function_overridden(_Ret (*__fptr)(_Args...)) no
   // Now get a uintptr_t out of these locations, and out of the function pointer.
   uintptr_t __start = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(&__lcxx_override_start);
   uintptr_t __end   = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(&__lcxx_override_end);
-  uintptr_t __ptr   = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(__fptr);
+  uintptr_t __ptr   = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(_Func);
 
 #  if __has_feature(ptrauth_calls)
   // We must pass a void* to ptrauth_strip since it only accepts a pointer type. Also, in particular,
@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ _LIBCPP_END_NAMESPACE_STD
 #elif defined(_LIBCPP_OBJECT_FORMAT_ELF) && !defined(__NVPTX__)
 
 #  define _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION 1
-#  define _LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE __attribute__((__section__("__lcxx_override")))
+#  define _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(type, name, arglist)                                                            \
+    __attribute__((__section__("__lcxx_override"))) _LIBCPP_WEAK type name arglist
 
 // This is very similar to what we do for Mach-O above. The ELF linker will implicitly define
 // variables with those names corresponding to the start and the end of the section.
@@ -110,11 +111,11 @@ extern char __start___lcxx_override;
 extern char __stop___lcxx_override;
 
 _LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-template <class _Ret, class... _Args>
-_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool __is_function_overridden(_Ret (*__fptr)(_Args...)) noexcept {
+template <typename T, T* _Func>
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI inline bool __is_function_overridden() noexcept {
   uintptr_t __start = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(&__start___lcxx_override);
   uintptr_t __end   = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(&__stop___lcxx_override);
-  uintptr_t __ptr   = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(__fptr);
+  uintptr_t __ptr   = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(_Func);
 
 #  if __has_feature(ptrauth_calls)
   // We must pass a void* to ptrauth_strip since it only accepts a pointer type. See full explanation above.

libcxx/src/new.cpp

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void* operator_new_impl(std::size_t size) {
   return p;
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(std::size_t size) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new, (std::size_t size)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
   void* p = operator_new_impl(size);
   if (p == nullptr)
     __throw_bad_alloc_shim();
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #  if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #    if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t)>(&operator new)),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t), &operator new>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new(size_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new(size_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new(size_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new(size_t)`, which will terminate in case "
@@ -74,15 +74,13 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #  endif
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
-  return ::operator new(size);
-}
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new[], (size_t size)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC { return ::operator new(size); }
 
 _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #  if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #    if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t)>(&operator new[])),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t), &operator new[]>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new[](size_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new[](size_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new[](size_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new[](size_t)`, which will terminate in case "
@@ -136,8 +134,7 @@ static void* operator_new_aligned_impl(std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignm
   return p;
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void*
-operator new(std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new, (std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
   void* p = operator_new_aligned_impl(size, alignment);
   if (p == nullptr)
     __throw_bad_alloc_shim();
@@ -148,7 +145,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const s
 #    if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #      if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t, std::align_val_t)>(&operator new)),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t, std::align_val_t), &operator new>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new(size_t, align_val_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new(size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new(size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new(size_t, align_val_t)`, which will "
@@ -168,23 +165,21 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const s
 #    endif
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void*
-operator new[](size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new[], (size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
   return ::operator new(size, alignment);
 }
 
 _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #    if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #      if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t, std::align_val_t)>(&operator new[])),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t, std::align_val_t), &operator new[]>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t)`, which will "
       "terminate in case it fails to allocate, making it impossible for `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, "
       "nothrow_t)` to fulfill its contract (since it should return nullptr upon failure). Please make sure you "
-      "override "
-      "`operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` as well.");
+      "override `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` as well.");
 #      endif
 
   return operator_new_aligned_impl(size, alignment);

libcxxabi/src/stdlib_new_delete.cpp

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void* operator_new_impl(std::size_t size) {
   return p;
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(std::size_t size) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new, (std::size_t size)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
   void* p = operator_new_impl(size);
   if (p == nullptr)
     __throw_bad_alloc_shim();
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #  if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t)>(&operator new)),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t), &operator new>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new(size_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new(size_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new(size_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new(size_t)`, which will terminate in case "
@@ -94,15 +94,13 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #endif
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
-  return ::operator new(size);
-}
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new[], (size_t size)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC { return ::operator new(size); }
 
 _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #  if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t)>(&operator new[])),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t), &operator new[]>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new[](size_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new[](size_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new[](size_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new[](size_t)`, which will terminate in case "
@@ -156,8 +154,7 @@ static void* operator_new_aligned_impl(std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignm
   return p;
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void*
-operator new(std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new, (std::size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
   void* p = operator_new_aligned_impl(size, alignment);
   if (p == nullptr)
     __throw_bad_alloc_shim();
@@ -168,7 +165,7 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const s
 #  if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #    if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t, std::align_val_t)>(&operator new)),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t, std::align_val_t), &operator new>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new(size_t, align_val_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new(size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new(size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new(size_t, align_val_t)`, which will "
@@ -188,23 +185,21 @@ _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new(size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const s
 #  endif
 }
 
-_LIBCPP_MAKE_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION_DETECTABLE _LIBCPP_WEAK void*
-operator new[](size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
+_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNCTION(void*, operator new[], (size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment)) _THROW_BAD_ALLOC {
   return ::operator new(size, alignment);
 }
 
 _LIBCPP_WEAK void* operator new[](size_t size, std::align_val_t alignment, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept {
 #  if !_LIBCPP_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
 #    if _LIBCPP_CAN_DETECT_OVERRIDDEN_FUNCTION
   _LIBCPP_ASSERT_SHIM(
-      !std::__is_function_overridden(static_cast<void* (*)(std::size_t, std::align_val_t)>(&operator new[])),
+      (!std::__is_function_overridden < void*(std::size_t, std::align_val_t), &operator new[]>()),
       "libc++ was configured with exceptions disabled and `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t)` has been overridden, "
       "but `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` has not been overridden. This is problematic because "
       "`operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` must call `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t)`, which will "
       "terminate in case it fails to allocate, making it impossible for `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, "
       "nothrow_t)` to fulfill its contract (since it should return nullptr upon failure). Please make sure you "
-      "override "
-      "`operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` as well.");
+      "override `operator new[](size_t, align_val_t, nothrow_t)` as well.");
 #    endif
 
   return operator_new_aligned_impl(size, alignment);