-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Revert "[Metadata] Preserve MD_prof when merging instructions when one is missing." #134200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
snehasish
merged 1 commit into
main
from
revert-132433-users/snehasish/03-21-_metadata_preserve_md_prof_when_merging_instructions_when_one_is_missing
Apr 3, 2025
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…e is mis…" This reverts commit c18994c.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: Snehasish Kumar (snehasish) ChangesReverts llvm/llvm-project#132433 I suspect this change caused a failure in the bolt build bot.
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134200.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
index c136825d47b9c..edec0e7a94422 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
@@ -3355,10 +3355,9 @@ static void combineMetadata(Instruction *K, const Instruction *J,
case LLVMContext::MD_invariant_group:
// Preserve !invariant.group in K.
break;
- // Keep empty cases for prof, mmra, memprof, and callsite to prevent them
- // from being removed as unknown metadata. The actual merging is handled
+ // Keep empty cases for mmra, memprof, and callsite to prevent them from
+ // being removed as unknown metadata. The actual merging is handled
// separately below.
- case LLVMContext::MD_prof:
case LLVMContext::MD_mmra:
case LLVMContext::MD_memprof:
case LLVMContext::MD_callsite:
@@ -3387,6 +3386,10 @@ static void combineMetadata(Instruction *K, const Instruction *J,
if (!AAOnly)
K->setMetadata(Kind, JMD);
break;
+ case LLVMContext::MD_prof:
+ if (!AAOnly && DoesKMove)
+ K->setMetadata(Kind, MDNode::getMergedProfMetadata(KMD, JMD, K, J));
+ break;
case LLVMContext::MD_noalias_addrspace:
if (DoesKMove)
K->setMetadata(Kind,
@@ -3433,16 +3436,6 @@ static void combineMetadata(Instruction *K, const Instruction *J,
K->setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_callsite,
MDNode::getMergedCallsiteMetadata(KCallSite, JCallSite));
}
-
- // Merge prof metadata.
- // Handle separately to support cases where only one instruction has the
- // metadata.
- auto *JProf = J->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof);
- auto *KProf = K->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof);
- if (!AAOnly && (JProf || KProf)) {
- K->setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof,
- MDNode::getMergedProfMetadata(KProf, JProf, K, J));
- }
}
void llvm::combineMetadataForCSE(Instruction *K, const Instruction *J,
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/merge-direct-call-branch-weights-preserve-hoist.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/merge-direct-call-branch-weights-preserve-hoist.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index d6058134f5285..0000000000000
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/merge-direct-call-branch-weights-preserve-hoist.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --check-globals --version 2
-; RUN: opt < %s -passes='simplifycfg<no-sink-common-insts;hoist-common-insts>' -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=HOIST
-
-; Test case based on C++ code with manualy annotated !prof metadata.
-; This is to test that when calls to 'func1' from 'if.then' block
-; and 'if.else' block are hoisted, the branch_weights are merged and
-; attached to merged call rather than dropped.
-;
-; int func1(int a, int b) ;
-; int func2(int a, int b) ;
-
-; int func(int a, int b, bool c) {
-; int sum= 0;
-; if(c) {
-; sum += func1(a, b);
-; } else {
-; sum += func1(a, b);
-; sum -= func2(a, b);
-; }
-; return sum;
-; }
-define i32 @_Z4funciib(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c) {
-; HOIST-LABEL: define i32 @_Z4funciib
-; HOIST-SAME: (i32 [[A:%.*]], i32 [[B:%.*]], i1 [[C:%.*]]) {
-; HOIST-NEXT: entry:
-; HOIST-NEXT: [[CALL:%.*]] = tail call i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32 [[A]], i32 [[B]]), !prof [[PROF0:![0-9]+]]
-; HOIST-NEXT: br i1 [[C]], label [[IF_END:%.*]], label [[IF_ELSE:%.*]]
-; HOIST: if.else:
-; HOIST-NEXT: [[CALL3:%.*]] = tail call i32 @_Z5func2ii(i32 [[A]], i32 [[B]])
-; HOIST-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[CALL]], [[CALL3]]
-; HOIST-NEXT: br label [[IF_END]]
-; HOIST: if.end:
-; HOIST-NEXT: [[SUM_0:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[SUB]], [[IF_ELSE]] ], [ [[CALL]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
-; HOIST-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUM_0]]
-;
-entry:
- br i1 %c, label %if.then, label %if.else
-
-if.then: ; preds = %entry
- %call = tail call i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32 %a, i32 %b)
- br label %if.end
-
-if.else: ; preds = %entry
- %call1 = tail call i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32 %a, i32 %b), !prof !0
- %call3 = tail call i32 @_Z5func2ii(i32 %a, i32 %b)
- %sub = sub i32 %call1, %call3
- br label %if.end
-
-if.end: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
- %sum.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %sub, %if.else ]
- ret i32 %sum.0
-}
-
-declare i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32, i32)
-
-declare i32 @_Z5func2ii(i32, i32)
-
-!0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 10}
-
-;.
-; HOIST: [[PROF0]] = !{!"branch_weights", i32 10}
-;.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/merge-direct-call-branch-weights-preserve-sink.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/merge-direct-call-branch-weights-preserve-sink.ll
deleted file mode 100644
index c4aed5eb95888..0000000000000
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/merge-direct-call-branch-weights-preserve-sink.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
-; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --check-globals --version 2
-; RUN: opt < %s -passes='simplifycfg<sink-common-insts;no-hoist-common-insts>' -simplifycfg-require-and-preserve-domtree=1 -S | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SINK
-
-
-; Test case based on the following C++ code with manualy annotated !prof metadata.
-; This is to test that when calls to 'func1' from 'if.then' and 'if.else' are
-; sinked, the branch weights are merged and attached to sinked call.
-;
-; int func1(int a, int b) ;
-; int func2(int a, int b) ;
-
-; int func(int a, int b, bool c) {
-; int sum = 0;
-; if (c) {
-; sum += func1(a,b);
-; } else {
-; b -= func2(a,b);
-; sum += func1(a,b);
-; }
-; return sum;
-; }
-
-define i32 @_Z4funciib(i32 %a, i32 %b, i1 %c) {
-; SINK-LABEL: define i32 @_Z4funciib
-; SINK-SAME: (i32 [[A:%.*]], i32 [[B:%.*]], i1 [[C:%.*]]) {
-; SINK-NEXT: entry:
-; SINK-NEXT: br i1 [[C]], label [[IF_END:%.*]], label [[IF_ELSE:%.*]]
-; SINK: if.else:
-; SINK-NEXT: [[CALL1:%.*]] = tail call i32 @_Z5func2ii(i32 [[A]], i32 [[B]])
-; SINK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[B]], [[CALL1]]
-; SINK-NEXT: br label [[IF_END]]
-; SINK: if.end:
-; SINK-NEXT: [[SUB_SINK:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[SUB]], [[IF_ELSE]] ], [ [[B]], [[ENTRY:%.*]] ]
-; SINK-NEXT: [[CALL2:%.*]] = tail call i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32 [[A]], i32 [[SUB_SINK]]), !prof [[PROF0:![0-9]+]]
-; SINK-NEXT: ret i32 [[CALL2]]
-;
-entry:
- br i1 %c, label %if.then, label %if.else
-
-if.then: ; preds = %entry
- %call = tail call i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32 %a, i32 %b), !prof !0
- br label %if.end
-
-if.else: ; preds = %entry
- %call1 = tail call i32 @_Z5func2ii(i32 %a, i32 %b)
- %sub = sub i32 %b, %call1
- %call2 = tail call i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32 %a, i32 %sub)
- br label %if.end
-
-if.end: ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
- %sum.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %call2, %if.else ]
- ret i32 %sum.0
-}
-
-declare i32 @_Z5func1ii(i32, i32)
-
-declare i32 @_Z5func2ii(i32, i32)
-
-!0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 10}
-
-;.
-; SINK: [[PROF0]] = !{!"branch_weights", i32 10}
-;.
|
snehasish
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
…e is missing. (#135418) Preserve branch weight metadata when merging instructions if one of the instructions is missing metadata. This is similar in behaviour to what we do today for other types of metadata such as mmra, memprof and callsite metadata. Also add a legality check when merging prof metadata based on instruction type. Without this check GVN PRE optimizations result in prof metadata on phi nodes which break the module verifier. Build failure caught by https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/113/builds/6621 ``` !9185 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3912, i32 802} Wrong number of operands !9185 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3912, i32 802} fatal error: error in backend: Broken module found, compilation aborted! ``` Reverts #134200 with additional changes.
IanWood1
pushed a commit
to IanWood1/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
…e is missing. (llvm#135418) Preserve branch weight metadata when merging instructions if one of the instructions is missing metadata. This is similar in behaviour to what we do today for other types of metadata such as mmra, memprof and callsite metadata. Also add a legality check when merging prof metadata based on instruction type. Without this check GVN PRE optimizations result in prof metadata on phi nodes which break the module verifier. Build failure caught by https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/113/builds/6621 ``` !9185 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3912, i32 802} Wrong number of operands !9185 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3912, i32 802} fatal error: error in backend: Broken module found, compilation aborted! ``` Reverts llvm#134200 with additional changes.
IanWood1
pushed a commit
to IanWood1/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
…e is missing. (llvm#135418) Preserve branch weight metadata when merging instructions if one of the instructions is missing metadata. This is similar in behaviour to what we do today for other types of metadata such as mmra, memprof and callsite metadata. Also add a legality check when merging prof metadata based on instruction type. Without this check GVN PRE optimizations result in prof metadata on phi nodes which break the module verifier. Build failure caught by https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/113/builds/6621 ``` !9185 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3912, i32 802} Wrong number of operands !9185 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 3912, i32 802} fatal error: error in backend: Broken module found, compilation aborted! ``` Reverts llvm#134200 with additional changes.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #132433
I suspect this change caused a failure in the bolt build bot.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/113/builds/6621