Skip to content

[KeyInstr][Clang] Switch stmt atom #134643

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 27, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2293,6 +2293,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitSwitchStmt(const SwitchStmt &S) {
// failure.
llvm::BasicBlock *DefaultBlock = createBasicBlock("sw.default");
SwitchInsn = Builder.CreateSwitch(CondV, DefaultBlock);
addInstToNewSourceAtom(SwitchInsn, CondV);

if (HLSLControlFlowAttr != HLSLControlFlowHintAttr::SpellingNotCalculated) {
llvm::MDBuilder MDHelper(CGM.getLLVMContext());
llvm::ConstantInt *BranchHintConstant =
Expand Down
51 changes: 51 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/DebugInfo/KeyInstructions/switch.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -gkey-instructions -x c++ -std=c++17 %s -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -emit-llvm -o - \
// RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not atomRank --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-CXX

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -gkey-instructions -x c %s -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -emit-llvm -o - \
// RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not atomRank

int g;
void a(int A, int B) {
// CHECK: entry:
// The load gets associated with the branch rather than the store.
// TODO: Associating it with the store may be a better choice.
// CHECK: %0 = load i32, ptr %A.addr{{.*}}, !dbg [[G2R2:!.*]]
// CHECK: store i32 %0, ptr @g{{.*}}, !dbg [[G1R1:!.*]]
// CHECK: switch i32 %0, label %{{.*}} [
// CHECK: i32 0, label %sw.bb
// CHECK: i32 1, label %sw.bb1
// CHECK: ], !dbg [[G2R1:!.*]]
switch ((g = A)) {
case 0: break;
case 1: {
// CHECK: sw.bb1:
// CHECK: %1 = load i32, ptr %B.addr{{.*}}, !dbg [[G3R2:!.*]]
// CHECK: switch i32 %1, label %{{.*}} [
// CHECK: i32 0, label %sw.bb2
// CHECK: ], !dbg [[G3R1:!.*]]
switch ((B)) {
case 0: {
// Test that assignments in constant-folded switches don't go missing.
// CHECK-CXX: sw.bb2:
// CHECK-CXX: store i32 1, ptr %C{{.*}}, !dbg [[G4R1:!.*]]
Comment on lines +29 to +30
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be testing for the switch getting a distinct group number too? For completeness if nothing else.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no switch emitted as it gets constant folded: https://godbolt.org/z/3vv4qxTMr

#ifdef __cplusplus
switch (const int C = 1; C) {
case 0: break;
case 1: break;
default: break;
}
#endif
} break;
default: break;
}
} break;
default: break;
}
}

// CHECK: [[G2R2]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 2, atomRank: 2)
// CHECK: [[G1R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 1, atomRank: 1)
// CHECK: [[G2R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 2, atomRank: 1)
// CHECK: [[G3R2]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 3, atomRank: 2)
// CHECK: [[G3R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 3, atomRank: 1)
// CHECK-CXX: [[G4R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 4, atomRank: 1)
Loading