-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[flang][docs] Add note about Cray pointers and the TARGET attribute #137993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We found some tests checking for loops assigning between Cray pointer handles and their pointees which produced "incorrect" results with optimizations enabled; this is because the compiler expects Cray pointers not to alias with any other entity. The HPE documentation for Cray Fortran extensions specifies: > the compiler assumes that the storage of a pointee is > never overlaid on the storage of another variable Jean pointed out that if a user's code uses entities that alias via Cray pointers, they may add the TARGET attribute to inform Flang of this aliasing, but that Flang's behavior is inline with Cray's own documentation and we should not make any changes to our alias analysis to try and detect this case. Updating documentation so that users that encounter this situation have a way to allow their code to compile as they intend.
eugeneepshteyn
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2025
jeanPerier
approved these changes
May 5, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Asher! LGTM.
IanWood1
pushed a commit
to IanWood1/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
…lvm#137993) We found some tests checking for loops assigning between Cray pointer handles and their pointees which produced "incorrect" results with optimizations enabled; this is because the compiler expects Cray pointers not to alias with any other entity. [The HPE documentation for Cray Fortran extensions specifies:](https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=a00113911en_us&docLocale=en_US&page=Types.html#cray-poiter-type) > the compiler assumes that the storage of a pointee is > never overlaid on the storage of another variable Jean pointed out that if a user's code uses entities that alias via Cray pointers, they may add the TARGET attribute to inform Flang of this aliasing, but that Flang's behavior is in line with Cray's own documentation and we should not make any changes to our alias analysis to try and detect this case. Updating documentation so that users that encounter this situation have a way to allow their code to compile as they intend.
IanWood1
pushed a commit
to IanWood1/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
…lvm#137993) We found some tests checking for loops assigning between Cray pointer handles and their pointees which produced "incorrect" results with optimizations enabled; this is because the compiler expects Cray pointers not to alias with any other entity. [The HPE documentation for Cray Fortran extensions specifies:](https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=a00113911en_us&docLocale=en_US&page=Types.html#cray-poiter-type) > the compiler assumes that the storage of a pointee is > never overlaid on the storage of another variable Jean pointed out that if a user's code uses entities that alias via Cray pointers, they may add the TARGET attribute to inform Flang of this aliasing, but that Flang's behavior is in line with Cray's own documentation and we should not make any changes to our alias analysis to try and detect this case. Updating documentation so that users that encounter this situation have a way to allow their code to compile as they intend.
IanWood1
pushed a commit
to IanWood1/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
…lvm#137993) We found some tests checking for loops assigning between Cray pointer handles and their pointees which produced "incorrect" results with optimizations enabled; this is because the compiler expects Cray pointers not to alias with any other entity. [The HPE documentation for Cray Fortran extensions specifies:](https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=a00113911en_us&docLocale=en_US&page=Types.html#cray-poiter-type) > the compiler assumes that the storage of a pointee is > never overlaid on the storage of another variable Jean pointed out that if a user's code uses entities that alias via Cray pointers, they may add the TARGET attribute to inform Flang of this aliasing, but that Flang's behavior is in line with Cray's own documentation and we should not make any changes to our alias analysis to try and detect this case. Updating documentation so that users that encounter this situation have a way to allow their code to compile as they intend.
GeorgeARM
pushed a commit
to GeorgeARM/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
…lvm#137993) We found some tests checking for loops assigning between Cray pointer handles and their pointees which produced "incorrect" results with optimizations enabled; this is because the compiler expects Cray pointers not to alias with any other entity. [The HPE documentation for Cray Fortran extensions specifies:](https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=a00113911en_us&docLocale=en_US&page=Types.html#cray-poiter-type) > the compiler assumes that the storage of a pointee is > never overlaid on the storage of another variable Jean pointed out that if a user's code uses entities that alias via Cray pointers, they may add the TARGET attribute to inform Flang of this aliasing, but that Flang's behavior is in line with Cray's own documentation and we should not make any changes to our alias analysis to try and detect this case. Updating documentation so that users that encounter this situation have a way to allow their code to compile as they intend.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We found some tests checking for loops assigning between Cray pointer handles and their pointees which produced "incorrect" results with optimizations enabled; this is because the compiler expects Cray pointers not to alias with any other entity.
The HPE documentation for Cray Fortran extensions specifies:
Jean pointed out that if a user's code uses entities that alias via Cray pointers, they may add the TARGET attribute to inform Flang of this aliasing, but that Flang's behavior is in line with Cray's own documentation and we should not make any changes to our alias analysis to try and detect this case.
Updating documentation so that users that encounter this situation have a way to allow their code to compile as they intend.