-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[VPlan] Simplify branch on False in VPlan transform (NFC). #140409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 11 commits
063d70f
f5ee27b
74eddb5
61779cf
801b98d
069767b
d3df2c3
3f3f002
69ad1de
9233672
6ced27d
2b76566
5797781
761d4ca
ff89acf
fa0eab1
57652c7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -2379,13 +2379,15 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::introduceCheckBlockInVPlan(BasicBlock *CheckIRBB) { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
PreVectorPH->swapSuccessors(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// We just connected a new block to the scalar preheader. Update all | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// ResumePhis by adding an incoming value for it, replicating the last value. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for (VPRecipeBase &R : *cast<VPBasicBlock>(ScalarPH)) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *ResumePhi = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(&R); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if (!ResumePhi || ResumePhi->getOpcode() != VPInstruction::ResumePhi) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
continue; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// VPPhis by adding an incoming value for it, replicating the last value. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
unsigned NumPredecessors = ScalarPH->getNumPredecessors(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(void)NumPredecessors; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Removed thanks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for (VPRecipeBase &R : cast<VPBasicBlock>(ScalarPH)->phis()) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *ResumePhi = cast<VPPhi>(&R); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ResumePhi->addOperand( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ResumePhi->getOperand(ResumePhi->getNumOperands() - 1)); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assert(ResumePhi->getNumIncoming() == NumPredecessors && | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"must have incoming values for all operands"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Updated thanks |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -2533,7 +2535,8 @@ BasicBlock *InnerLoopVectorizer::emitMemRuntimeChecks(BasicBlock *Bypass) { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
static void replaceVPBBWithIRVPBB(VPBasicBlock *VPBB, BasicBlock *IRBB) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPIRBasicBlock *IRVPBB = VPBB->getPlan()->createVPIRBasicBlock(IRBB); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for (auto &R : make_early_inc_range(*VPBB)) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assert(!R.isPhi() && "Tried to move phi recipe to end of block"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assert((IRVPBB->empty() || IRVPBB->back().isPhi() || !R.isPhi()) && | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Tried to move phi recipe after a non-phi recipe"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R.moveBefore(*IRVPBB, IRVPBB->end()); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -7535,10 +7538,7 @@ static void fixReductionScalarResumeWhenVectorizingEpilog( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
// created a bc.merge.rdx Phi after the main vector body. Ensure that we carry | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// over the incoming values correctly. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
using namespace VPlanPatternMatch; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto IsResumePhi = [](VPUser *U) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *VPI = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(U); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return VPI && VPI->getOpcode() == VPInstruction::ResumePhi; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
}; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto IsResumePhi = [](VPUser *U) { return isa<VPPhi>(U); }; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assert(count_if(EpiRedResult->users(), IsResumePhi) == 1 && | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"ResumePhi must have a single user"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *EpiResumePhiVPI = | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -8723,9 +8723,8 @@ static VPInstruction *addResumePhiRecipeForInduction( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WideIV->getDebugLoc()); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *ResumePhiRecipe = | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ScalarPHBuilder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::ResumePhi, {EndValue, Start}, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WideIV->getDebugLoc(), "bc.resume.val"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *ResumePhiRecipe = ScalarPHBuilder.createScalarPhi( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{EndValue, Start}, WideIV->getDebugLoc(), "bc.resume.val"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return ResumePhiRecipe; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -8754,8 +8753,7 @@ static void addScalarResumePhis(VPRecipeBuilder &Builder, VPlan &Plan, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
if (VPInstruction *ResumePhi = addResumePhiRecipeForInduction( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WideIVR, VectorPHBuilder, ScalarPHBuilder, TypeInfo, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
&Plan.getVectorTripCount())) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assert(ResumePhi->getOpcode() == VPInstruction::ResumePhi && | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Expected a ResumePhi"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assert(isa<VPPhi>(ResumePhi) && "Expected a phi"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IVEndValues[WideIVR] = ResumePhi->getOperand(0); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ScalarPhiIRI->addOperand(ResumePhi); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
continue; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -8780,8 +8778,7 @@ static void addScalarResumePhis(VPRecipeBuilder &Builder, VPlan &Plan, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPInstruction::ExtractLastElement, {ResumeFromVectorLoop}, {}, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"vector.recur.extract"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
StringRef Name = IsFOR ? "scalar.recur.init" : "bc.merge.rdx"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *ResumePhiR = ScalarPHBuilder.createNaryOp( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPInstruction::ResumePhi, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
auto *ResumePhiR = ScalarPHBuilder.createScalarPhi( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{ResumeFromVectorLoop, VectorPhiR->getStartValue()}, {}, Name); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ScalarPhiIRI->addOperand(ResumePhiR); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -9962,9 +9959,7 @@ static void preparePlanForMainVectorLoop(VPlan &MainPlan, VPlan &EpiPlan) { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPI->setOperand(1, Freeze); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if (UpdateResumePhis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OrigStart->replaceUsesWithIf(Freeze, [Freeze](VPUser &U, unsigned) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return Freeze != &U && isa<VPInstruction>(&U) && | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cast<VPInstruction>(&U)->getOpcode() == | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPInstruction::ResumePhi; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return Freeze != &U && isa<VPPhi>(&U); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
}); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
}; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -9977,13 +9972,12 @@ static void preparePlanForMainVectorLoop(VPlan &MainPlan, VPlan &EpiPlan) { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
// scalar (which will become vector) epilogue loop we are done. Otherwise | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// create it below. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if (any_of(*MainScalarPH, [VectorTC](VPRecipeBase &R) { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return match(&R, m_VPInstruction<VPInstruction::ResumePhi>( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
m_Specific(VectorTC), m_SpecificInt(0))); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return match(&R, m_VPInstruction<Instruction::PHI>(m_Specific(VectorTC), | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
m_SpecificInt(0))); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
})) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
return; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPBuilder ScalarPHBuilder(MainScalarPH, MainScalarPH->begin()); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ScalarPHBuilder.createNaryOp( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VPInstruction::ResumePhi, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ScalarPHBuilder.createScalarPhi( | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{VectorTC, MainPlan.getCanonicalIV()->getStartValue()}, {}, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"vec.epilog.resume.val"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -887,11 +887,6 @@ class VPInstruction : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags, | |||||
SLPStore, | ||||||
ActiveLaneMask, | ||||||
ExplicitVectorLength, | ||||||
/// Creates a scalar phi in a leaf VPBB with a single predecessor in VPlan. | ||||||
/// The first operand is the incoming value from the predecessor in VPlan, | ||||||
/// the second operand is the incoming value for all other predecessors | ||||||
/// (which are currently not modeled in VPlan). | ||||||
ResumePhi, | ||||||
CalculateTripCountMinusVF, | ||||||
// Increment the canonical IV separately for each unrolled part. | ||||||
CanonicalIVIncrementForPart, | ||||||
|
@@ -1127,6 +1122,10 @@ class VPPhiAccessors { | |||||
return getAsRecipe()->getNumOperands(); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
/// Removes the incoming value corresponding to \p IncomingBlock, which must | ||||||
/// be a predecessor. | ||||||
void removeIncomingValue(VPBlockBase *IncomingBlock) const; | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done thanks |
||||||
|
||||||
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | ||||||
/// Print the recipe. | ||||||
void printPhiOperands(raw_ostream &O, VPSlotTracker &SlotTracker) const; | ||||||
|
@@ -1137,11 +1136,15 @@ struct VPPhi : public VPInstruction, public VPPhiAccessors { | |||||
VPPhi(ArrayRef<VPValue *> Operands, DebugLoc DL, const Twine &Name = "") | ||||||
: VPInstruction(Instruction::PHI, Operands, DL, Name) {} | ||||||
|
||||||
static inline bool classof(const VPRecipeBase *U) { | ||||||
static inline bool classof(const VPUser *U) { | ||||||
auto *R = dyn_cast<VPInstruction>(U); | ||||||
return R && R->getOpcode() == Instruction::PHI; | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
VPPhi *clone() override { | ||||||
return new VPPhi(operands(), getDebugLoc(), getName()); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
void execute(VPTransformState &State) override; | ||||||
|
||||||
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | ||||||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -501,8 +501,10 @@ void VPlanTransforms::prepareForVectorization( | |||||
cast<VPBasicBlock>(HeaderVPB), | ||||||
cast<VPBasicBlock>(LatchVPB), Range); | ||||||
HandledUncountableEarlyExit = true; | ||||||
} else { | ||||||
for (VPRecipeBase &R : EB->phis()) | ||||||
cast<VPIRPhi>(&R)->removeIncomingValue(Pred); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
cast<VPBasicBlock>(Pred)->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); | ||||||
VPBlockUtils::disconnectBlocks(Pred, EB); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
@@ -526,56 +528,51 @@ void VPlanTransforms::prepareForVectorization( | |||||
VPBasicBlock *ScalarPH = Plan.createVPBasicBlock("scalar.ph"); | ||||||
VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(ScalarPH, Plan.getScalarHeader()); | ||||||
|
||||||
// If needed, add a check in the middle block to see if we have completed | ||||||
// all of the iterations in the first vector loop. Three cases: | ||||||
// 1) If we require a scalar epilogue, there is no conditional branch as | ||||||
// we unconditionally branch to the scalar preheader. Remove the recipes | ||||||
// from the exit blocks. | ||||||
// 2) If (N - N%VF) == N, then we *don't* need to run the remainder. | ||||||
// Thus if tail is to be folded, we know we don't need to run the | ||||||
// remainder and we can set the condition to true. | ||||||
// 3) Otherwise, construct a runtime check. | ||||||
|
||||||
if (!RequiresScalarEpilogueCheck) { | ||||||
if (auto *LatchExitVPB = MiddleVPBB->getSingleSuccessor()) | ||||||
VPBlockUtils::disconnectBlocks(MiddleVPBB, LatchExitVPB); | ||||||
VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(MiddleVPBB, ScalarPH); | ||||||
VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(Plan.getEntry(), ScalarPH); | ||||||
Plan.getEntry()->swapSuccessors(); | ||||||
|
||||||
// The exit blocks are unreachable, remove their recipes to make sure no | ||||||
// users remain that may pessimize transforms. | ||||||
for (auto *EB : Plan.getExitBlocks()) { | ||||||
for (VPRecipeBase &R : make_early_inc_range(*EB)) | ||||||
R.eraseFromParent(); | ||||||
} | ||||||
return; | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
// The connection order corresponds to the operands of the conditional branch, | ||||||
// with the middle block already connected to the exit block. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Above two lines should be discarded? Or updated to end with "if needed"? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Dropped by accident, restored, thanks |
||||||
VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(MiddleVPBB, ScalarPH); | ||||||
// Also connect the entry block to the scalar preheader. | ||||||
// TODO: Also introduce a branch recipe together with the minimum trip count | ||||||
// check. | ||||||
VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(Plan.getEntry(), ScalarPH); | ||||||
Plan.getEntry()->swapSuccessors(); | ||||||
|
||||||
auto *ScalarLatchTerm = TheLoop->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator(); | ||||||
// Here we use the same DebugLoc as the scalar loop latch terminator instead | ||||||
// of the corresponding compare because they may have ended up with | ||||||
// different line numbers and we want to avoid awkward line stepping while | ||||||
// debugging. Eg. if the compare has got a line number inside the loop. | ||||||
// If MiddleVPBB has a single successor the original loop exits via the latch | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done thanks |
||||||
// and the single successor must be the scalar preheader. There's no need to | ||||||
// add a runtime check to MiddleVPBB. | ||||||
if (MiddleVPBB->getNumSuccessors() == 1) { | ||||||
assert(MiddleVPBB->getSingleSuccessor() == ScalarPH && | ||||||
"must have ScalarPH as single successor"); | ||||||
return; | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
assert(MiddleVPBB->getNumSuccessors() == 2 && "must have 2 successors"); | ||||||
|
||||||
// If needed, add a check in the middle block to see if we have completed | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done thanks |
||||||
// all of the iterations in the first vector loop. | ||||||
// Three cases: | ||||||
// 1) If we require a scalar epilogue, the scalar ph must execute. Set the | ||||||
// condition to false. | ||||||
// 2) If (N - N%VF) == N, then we *don't* need to run the | ||||||
// remainder. Thus if tail is to be folded, we know we don't need to run | ||||||
// the remainder and we can set the condition to true. | ||||||
// 3) Otherwise, construct a runtime check. | ||||||
|
||||||
// We use the same DebugLoc as the scalar loop latch terminator instead of | ||||||
// the corresponding compare because they may have ended up with different | ||||||
// line numbers and we want to avoid awkward line stepping while debugging. | ||||||
// E.g., if the compare has got a line number inside the loop. | ||||||
DebugLoc LatchDL = TheLoop->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator()->getDebugLoc(); | ||||||
VPBuilder Builder(MiddleVPBB); | ||||||
VPValue *Cmp = | ||||||
TailFolded | ||||||
? Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::getTrue( | ||||||
IntegerType::getInt1Ty(TripCount->getType()->getContext()))) | ||||||
: Builder.createICmp(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Plan.getTripCount(), | ||||||
&Plan.getVectorTripCount(), | ||||||
ScalarLatchTerm->getDebugLoc(), "cmp.n"); | ||||||
Builder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::BranchOnCond, {Cmp}, | ||||||
ScalarLatchTerm->getDebugLoc()); | ||||||
VPValue *Cmp; | ||||||
if (!RequiresScalarEpilogueCheck) | ||||||
Cmp = Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::getFalse( | ||||||
IntegerType::getInt1Ty(TripCount->getType()->getContext()))); | ||||||
else if (TailFolded) | ||||||
Cmp = Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::getTrue( | ||||||
IntegerType::getInt1Ty(TripCount->getType()->getContext()))); | ||||||
else | ||||||
Cmp = Builder.createICmp(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Plan.getTripCount(), | ||||||
&Plan.getVectorTripCount(), LatchDL, "cmp.n"); | ||||||
Builder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::BranchOnCond, {Cmp}, LatchDL); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
void VPlanTransforms::createLoopRegions(VPlan &Plan) { | ||||||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -733,17 +733,6 @@ Value *VPInstruction::generate(VPTransformState &State) { | |
Value *Addend = State.get(getOperand(1), VPLane(0)); | ||
return Builder.CreatePtrAdd(Ptr, Addend, Name, getGEPNoWrapFlags()); | ||
} | ||
case VPInstruction::ResumePhi: { | ||
auto *NewPhi = | ||
Builder.CreatePHI(State.TypeAnalysis.inferScalarType(this), 2, Name); | ||
for (const auto &[IncVPV, PredVPBB] : | ||
zip(operands(), getParent()->getPredecessors())) { | ||
Value *IncV = State.get(IncVPV, /* IsScalar */ true); | ||
BasicBlock *PredBB = State.CFG.VPBB2IRBB.at(cast<VPBasicBlock>(PredVPBB)); | ||
NewPhi->addIncoming(IncV, PredBB); | ||
} | ||
return NewPhi; | ||
} | ||
case VPInstruction::AnyOf: { | ||
Value *A = State.get(getOperand(0)); | ||
return Builder.CreateOrReduce(A); | ||
|
@@ -847,8 +836,7 @@ bool VPInstruction::isVectorToScalar() const { | |
} | ||
|
||
bool VPInstruction::isSingleScalar() const { | ||
return getOpcode() == VPInstruction::ResumePhi || | ||
getOpcode() == Instruction::PHI; | ||
return getOpcode() == Instruction::PHI; | ||
} | ||
|
||
void VPInstruction::execute(VPTransformState &State) { | ||
|
@@ -934,7 +922,6 @@ bool VPInstruction::onlyFirstLaneUsed(const VPValue *Op) const { | |
case VPInstruction::CanonicalIVIncrementForPart: | ||
case VPInstruction::BranchOnCount: | ||
case VPInstruction::BranchOnCond: | ||
case VPInstruction::ResumePhi: | ||
return true; | ||
case VPInstruction::PtrAdd: | ||
return Op == getOperand(0) || vputils::onlyFirstLaneUsed(this); | ||
|
@@ -991,9 +978,6 @@ void VPInstruction::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine &Indent, | |
case VPInstruction::ActiveLaneMask: | ||
O << "active lane mask"; | ||
break; | ||
case VPInstruction::ResumePhi: | ||
O << "resume-phi"; | ||
break; | ||
case VPInstruction::ExplicitVectorLength: | ||
O << "EXPLICIT-VECTOR-LENGTH"; | ||
break; | ||
|
@@ -1101,21 +1085,36 @@ void VPInstructionWithType::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine &Indent, | |
|
||
void VPPhi::execute(VPTransformState &State) { | ||
State.setDebugLocFrom(getDebugLoc()); | ||
BasicBlock *VectorPH = State.CFG.VPBB2IRBB.at(getIncomingBlock(0)); | ||
Value *Start = State.get(getIncomingValue(0), VPLane(0)); | ||
PHINode *Phi = State.Builder.CreatePHI(Start->getType(), 2, getName()); | ||
Phi->addIncoming(Start, VectorPH); | ||
State.set(this, Phi, VPLane(0)); | ||
PHINode *NewPhi = State.Builder.CreatePHI( | ||
State.TypeAnalysis.inferScalarType(this), 2, getName()); | ||
unsigned NumIncoming = getNumIncoming(); | ||
if (getParent() != getParent()->getPlan()->getScalarPreheader()) { | ||
// TODO: Fixup all incoming values of header phis once recipes defining them | ||
// are introduced. | ||
NumIncoming = 1; | ||
} | ||
for (unsigned Idx = 0; Idx != NumIncoming; ++Idx) { | ||
Value *IncV = State.get(getIncomingValue(Idx), VPLane(0)); | ||
BasicBlock *PredBB = State.CFG.VPBB2IRBB.at(getIncomingBlock(Idx)); | ||
NewPhi->addIncoming(IncV, PredBB); | ||
} | ||
State.set(this, NewPhi, VPLane(0)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | ||
void VPPhi::print(raw_ostream &O, const Twine &Indent, | ||
VPSlotTracker &SlotTracker) const { | ||
O << Indent << "EMIT" << (isSingleScalar() ? "-SCALAR" : "") << " "; | ||
printAsOperand(O, SlotTracker); | ||
O << " = phi "; | ||
|
||
printPhiOperands(O, SlotTracker); | ||
const VPBasicBlock *Parent = getParent(); | ||
if (Parent == Parent->getPlan()->getScalarPreheader()) { | ||
// TODO: Use regular printing for resume-phis as well | ||
O << " = resume-phi "; | ||
printOperands(O, SlotTracker); | ||
} else { | ||
O << " = phi "; | ||
printPhiOperands(O, SlotTracker); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
#endif | ||
|
||
|
@@ -1186,6 +1185,16 @@ void VPIRPhi::execute(VPTransformState &State) { | |
State.Builder.SetInsertPoint(Phi->getParent(), std::next(Phi->getIterator())); | ||
} | ||
|
||
void VPPhiAccessors::removeIncomingValue(VPBlockBase *IncomingBlock) const { | ||
VPRecipeBase *R = const_cast<VPRecipeBase *>(getAsRecipe()); | ||
auto &Preds = R->getParent()->getPredecessors(); | ||
assert(R->getNumOperands() == Preds.size() && | ||
"Number of phi operands must match number of predecessors"); | ||
unsigned Position = std::distance(Preds.begin(), find(Preds, IncomingBlock)); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should this part be There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Split off to 861502304c9fe79c01e3382c52652e87ac03713e, as there are already existing users for this utility, thanks. |
||
R->getOperand(Position)->removeUser(*R); | ||
R->removeOperand(Position); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good to keep these two changes atomic, taking care of both ends when removing an edge from def/use graph. Perhaps There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yep, moved the removal also to |
||
} | ||
|
||
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP) | ||
void VPPhiAccessors::printPhiOperands(raw_ostream &O, | ||
VPSlotTracker &SlotTracker) const { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: take the number of ScalarPH predecessors once, here, reuse it repeatedly inside the loop, asserting it is one more than the number of ResumePhi's operands.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, thanks