Skip to content

[ConstraintElim] Decompose shl nsw for signed predicates #76961

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ConstraintElimination.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ static Decomposition decompose(Value *V,
return Result;
}

// shl nsw x, shift is mul nsw x, (1<<shift),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: might be good to wrap the expressions in () or something else to separate them from the interleave text

// with the exception of shift == bw-1.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: reflow comment?

if (match(V, m_NSWShl(m_Value(Op0), m_ConstantInt(CI)))) {
uint64_t Shift = CI->getValue().getLimitedValue();
if (Shift < Ty->getIntegerBitWidth() - 1 && Shift < 64) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there's no test case for Shift >= 64 at the moment. IIUC this is to avoid overflows when doing 1 << Shift? We won't reach this code if the types are wider than 64 bit and if the type is <= i64 then shifts >= 64 will produce poison. Might be helpful for future readers to document the condition

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this check is actually redundant. I'll replace it with an assert.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good!

auto Result = decompose(Op0, Preconditions, IsSigned, DL);
Result.mul(int64_t(1) << Shift);
return Result;
}
}

return V;
}

Expand Down
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions llvm/test/Transforms/ConstraintElimination/shl.ll
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1283,8 +1283,7 @@ define i1 @shl_nsw_x8_slt_x7(i8 %start, i8 %high) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[C_1:%.*]] = icmp slt i8 [[START_SHL_3]], [[HIGH]]
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 [[C_1]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[START_MUL_7:%.*]] = mul nsw i8 [[START]], 7
; CHECK-NEXT: [[T_1:%.*]] = icmp slt i8 [[START_MUL_7]], [[HIGH]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[T_1]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
;
%c.0 = icmp sge i8 %high, 0
call void @llvm.assume(i1 %c.0)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1327,11 +1326,9 @@ define i1 @shl_nsw_sign_implication(i8 %x) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP1:%.*]] = icmp slt i8 [[X]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CMP1]], label [[IF:%.*]], label [[ELSE:%.*]]
; CHECK: if:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP2:%.*]] = icmp slt i8 [[SHL]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
; CHECK: else:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CMP3:%.*]] = icmp sge i8 [[SHL]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[CMP3]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
;
%shl = shl nsw i8 %x, 2
%cmp1 = icmp slt i8 %x, 0
Expand Down